Maria Alessandra Guerrizio, Simona Zito, Federica Mammarella, Ramon Frulio, Maria Paola Trotta, Roberto Da Cas, Emilio Maestri, Francesco Trotta
{"title":"Effectiveness of different local actions to control vitamin D prescription in Italy.","authors":"Maria Alessandra Guerrizio, Simona Zito, Federica Mammarella, Ramon Frulio, Maria Paola Trotta, Roberto Da Cas, Emilio Maestri, Francesco Trotta","doi":"10.4415/ANN_23_04_06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In the last decade, the significant expenditure and consumption increase of vitamin D in Italy led some regions to adopt strategies to improve prescribing appropriateness and contain expenditure.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Using the statistical analysis method of interrupted time series for consumption and expenditure of cholecalciferol, different types of interventions adopted in four Italian regions and their efficacy were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Molise achieved the best results by adopting a health professionals' education program in addition to a prescriber-sanction system. Emilia-Romagna also opted for a medical education strategy, but the results were less relevant due to the lack of penalties. Lazio obtained a slowdown in consumption growth by targeting on the utilization of lower-cost per defined daily dose (DDD) packs and adopting a therapeutic plan. Sardinia showed a decrease in expenditure by adopting a target threshold of lower-cost formulation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The reimbursement of the lowest-cost packs within the National Health Service (NHS) undoubtedly influences spending trend, but it does not solve prescriptive inappropriateness.</p>","PeriodicalId":8246,"journal":{"name":"Annali dell'Istituto superiore di sanita","volume":"59 4","pages":"271-279"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annali dell'Istituto superiore di sanita","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4415/ANN_23_04_06","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: In the last decade, the significant expenditure and consumption increase of vitamin D in Italy led some regions to adopt strategies to improve prescribing appropriateness and contain expenditure.
Materials and methods: Using the statistical analysis method of interrupted time series for consumption and expenditure of cholecalciferol, different types of interventions adopted in four Italian regions and their efficacy were evaluated.
Results: Molise achieved the best results by adopting a health professionals' education program in addition to a prescriber-sanction system. Emilia-Romagna also opted for a medical education strategy, but the results were less relevant due to the lack of penalties. Lazio obtained a slowdown in consumption growth by targeting on the utilization of lower-cost per defined daily dose (DDD) packs and adopting a therapeutic plan. Sardinia showed a decrease in expenditure by adopting a target threshold of lower-cost formulation.
Conclusion: The reimbursement of the lowest-cost packs within the National Health Service (NHS) undoubtedly influences spending trend, but it does not solve prescriptive inappropriateness.
导言:过去十年间,意大利维生素 D 的支出和消费量大幅增加,导致一些地区采取了提高处方适当性和控制支出的策略:采用胆钙化醇消费和支出间断时间序列统计分析方法,对意大利四个大区采取的不同类型干预措施及其效果进行了评估:结果:莫利塞大区在采用处方者制裁制度的同时,还采用了卫生专业人员教育计划,取得了最佳效果。艾米利亚-罗马涅大区也选择了医学教育策略,但由于缺乏惩罚措施,效果并不明显。拉齐奥通过使用成本较低的按规定日剂量(DDD)包装和采取治疗计划,使消费增长放缓。撒丁岛通过采用低成本制剂的目标阈值,减少了支出:结论:在国民医疗服务体系(NHS)内报销最低成本的药包无疑会影响支出趋势,但并不能解决处方不当的问题。
期刊介绍:
Annali dell’Istituto Superiore di Sanità is a peer reviewed quarterly science journal which publishes research articles in biomedicine, translational research and in many other disciplines of the health sciences. The journal includes the following material: original articles, reviews, commentaries, editorials, brief and technical notes, book reviews.
The publication of Monographic Sections has been discontinued. In case you wish to present a small number of coordinated contributions on specific themes concerning priorities in public health, please contact the Editorial office.
The journal is in English.