[Determination of 14 perfluoroalkyl substances in Chinese mitten crab by multi-plug filtration cleanup coupled with ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry].

IF 1.2 4区 化学 Q4 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Xianli Wang, Qinxiong Rao, Qicai Zhang, Penghui DU, Weiguo Song
{"title":"[Determination of 14 perfluoroalkyl substances in Chinese mitten crab by multi-plug filtration cleanup coupled with ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry].","authors":"Xianli Wang, Qinxiong Rao, Qicai Zhang, Penghui DU, Weiguo Song","doi":"10.3724/SP.J.1123.2023.07017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) have become a new food-safety problem. Dietary intake is a major pathway of human exposure to PFASs. Chinese mitten crab (<i>Eriocheir sinensis</i>) is a high-end aquaculture product popular among consumers in China. Conventional extraction methods for PFASs are cumbersome and time consuming, and result in incomplete purification; thus, this technique does not meet the requirements for PFAS detection. Herein, an analytical strategy was established for the rapid detection of 14 PFASs in Chinese mitten crab based on multi-plug filtration cleanup (m-PFC) and ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS). The carbon-chain length of the 14 PFASs analyzed in this study ranged from 4 to 14, and they are perfluorobutanoic acid (PFBA), perfluoro-<i>n</i>-pentanoic acid (PFPeA), perfluorohexanoic acid (PFHxA), perfluoroheptanoic acid (PFHpA), perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA), perfluorodecanoic acid (PFDA), perfluoroundecanoic acid (PFUnDA), perfluorododecanoic acid (PFDoDA), perfluorotetradecanoic acid (PFTeDA), perfluoro-1-butane sulfonic acid (PFBS), perfluoro-1-hexane sulfonic acid (PFHxS), perfluoro-1-octane sulfonic acid (PFOS), and perfluoro-1-decanesulfonate (PFDS). The m-PFC column was prepared using carboxy-based multiwalled carbon nanotubes, and used to reduce the interference of sample impurities. The samples were extracted with 5 mL of 0.1% formic acid aqueous solution, 15 mL of acetonitrile and extraction salt (2 g Na<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> and 2 g NaCl). The supernatant (10 mL) was purified using the m-PFC column, concentrated to near dryness under nitrogen, and then redissolved in 1 mL of methanol. Finally, the sample solution was filtered through a 0.22 μm polypropylene syringe filter for UPLC-MS/MS analysis. The target analytes were separated using a Shimadzu Shim-pack G1ST-C18 chromatographic column (100 mm×2.1 mm, 2 μm) using methanol (A) and 5 mmol/L ammonium acetate aqueous solution (B) as the mobile phases via gradient elution. The linear gradient program were as follows: 0-0.5 min, 10%A-35%A; 0.5-3 min, 35%A-60%A; 3-5 min, 60%A-100%A; 5-6.5 min, 100%A; 6.5-7 min, 100%A-10%A. The target analytes were analyzed using negative electrospray ionization in multiple-reaction monitoring mode, and quantitative analysis was performed using the internal standard method. In this study, we optimized the mobile-phase system as well as the extraction solvent, time, volume, and salt. The 14 PFASs exhibited good peak shapes and sensitivities when the 5 mmol/L ammonium acetate solution-methanol system was used as the mobile phase. Compared with acetonitrile or methanol alone, the extraction efficiencies of the 14 PFASs were significantly improved when 5 mL of 0.1% formic acid aqueous solution was added, followed by 15 mL of acetonitrile. The extraction efficiencies of the 14 PFASs did not differ significantly when the extraction time was within 3-15 min. The extraction salt (MgSO<sub>4</sub>, Na<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>, NaCl, (NH<sub>4</sub>)<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>, and Na<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>+NaCl) significantly affected the extraction efficiencies of the 14 PFASs. The highest extraction efficiencies of the 14 PFASs, which ranged from 47.9% to 121.9%, were obtained when Na<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>+NaCl was used as the extraction salt. Under the optimal experimental conditions, good linearities (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup>=0.998-0.999) were obtained for seven PFASs (PFBS, PFHxA, PFHpA, PFHxS, PFDA, PFDoDA, PFTeDA) at 0.10-100 μg/L, and seven PFASs (PFBA, PFPeA, PFOA, PFOS, PFNA, PFUnDA, PFDS) at 0.50-100 μg/L. The average spiked recoveries for the 14 PFASs in Chinese mitten crabs at three levels ranged from 73.1% to 120%, with relative standard deviations (RSDs) in the range of 1.68%-19.5%(<i>n</i>=6). The limits of detection (LODs) and quantification (LOQs) of the 14 PFASs were in the range of 0.03-0.15 and 0.10-0.50 μg/kg, respectively. The developed method was applied to the analysis of crab samples collected from three farms in Shanghai, and PFASs with total concentrations of 3.52-37.77 μg/kg were detected in all samples. The detection frequencies for PFDA, PFUnDA, PFDoDA, PFTeDA, and PFOS were 100%. PFDA, PFUnDA, PFOS, and PFDoDA were the most abundant congeners, accounting for 31.2%, 30.6%, 15.0%, and 10.9%, respectively, of the 14 PFASs detected. The proposed method is simple, efficient, accurate, and suitable for the rapid analysis of 14 PFASs in Chinese mitten crabs.</p>","PeriodicalId":9864,"journal":{"name":"色谱","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10719808/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"色谱","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1123.2023.07017","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) have become a new food-safety problem. Dietary intake is a major pathway of human exposure to PFASs. Chinese mitten crab (Eriocheir sinensis) is a high-end aquaculture product popular among consumers in China. Conventional extraction methods for PFASs are cumbersome and time consuming, and result in incomplete purification; thus, this technique does not meet the requirements for PFAS detection. Herein, an analytical strategy was established for the rapid detection of 14 PFASs in Chinese mitten crab based on multi-plug filtration cleanup (m-PFC) and ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS). The carbon-chain length of the 14 PFASs analyzed in this study ranged from 4 to 14, and they are perfluorobutanoic acid (PFBA), perfluoro-n-pentanoic acid (PFPeA), perfluorohexanoic acid (PFHxA), perfluoroheptanoic acid (PFHpA), perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA), perfluorodecanoic acid (PFDA), perfluoroundecanoic acid (PFUnDA), perfluorododecanoic acid (PFDoDA), perfluorotetradecanoic acid (PFTeDA), perfluoro-1-butane sulfonic acid (PFBS), perfluoro-1-hexane sulfonic acid (PFHxS), perfluoro-1-octane sulfonic acid (PFOS), and perfluoro-1-decanesulfonate (PFDS). The m-PFC column was prepared using carboxy-based multiwalled carbon nanotubes, and used to reduce the interference of sample impurities. The samples were extracted with 5 mL of 0.1% formic acid aqueous solution, 15 mL of acetonitrile and extraction salt (2 g Na2SO4 and 2 g NaCl). The supernatant (10 mL) was purified using the m-PFC column, concentrated to near dryness under nitrogen, and then redissolved in 1 mL of methanol. Finally, the sample solution was filtered through a 0.22 μm polypropylene syringe filter for UPLC-MS/MS analysis. The target analytes were separated using a Shimadzu Shim-pack G1ST-C18 chromatographic column (100 mm×2.1 mm, 2 μm) using methanol (A) and 5 mmol/L ammonium acetate aqueous solution (B) as the mobile phases via gradient elution. The linear gradient program were as follows: 0-0.5 min, 10%A-35%A; 0.5-3 min, 35%A-60%A; 3-5 min, 60%A-100%A; 5-6.5 min, 100%A; 6.5-7 min, 100%A-10%A. The target analytes were analyzed using negative electrospray ionization in multiple-reaction monitoring mode, and quantitative analysis was performed using the internal standard method. In this study, we optimized the mobile-phase system as well as the extraction solvent, time, volume, and salt. The 14 PFASs exhibited good peak shapes and sensitivities when the 5 mmol/L ammonium acetate solution-methanol system was used as the mobile phase. Compared with acetonitrile or methanol alone, the extraction efficiencies of the 14 PFASs were significantly improved when 5 mL of 0.1% formic acid aqueous solution was added, followed by 15 mL of acetonitrile. The extraction efficiencies of the 14 PFASs did not differ significantly when the extraction time was within 3-15 min. The extraction salt (MgSO4, Na2SO4, NaCl, (NH4)2SO4, and Na2SO4+NaCl) significantly affected the extraction efficiencies of the 14 PFASs. The highest extraction efficiencies of the 14 PFASs, which ranged from 47.9% to 121.9%, were obtained when Na2SO4+NaCl was used as the extraction salt. Under the optimal experimental conditions, good linearities (R2=0.998-0.999) were obtained for seven PFASs (PFBS, PFHxA, PFHpA, PFHxS, PFDA, PFDoDA, PFTeDA) at 0.10-100 μg/L, and seven PFASs (PFBA, PFPeA, PFOA, PFOS, PFNA, PFUnDA, PFDS) at 0.50-100 μg/L. The average spiked recoveries for the 14 PFASs in Chinese mitten crabs at three levels ranged from 73.1% to 120%, with relative standard deviations (RSDs) in the range of 1.68%-19.5%(n=6). The limits of detection (LODs) and quantification (LOQs) of the 14 PFASs were in the range of 0.03-0.15 and 0.10-0.50 μg/kg, respectively. The developed method was applied to the analysis of crab samples collected from three farms in Shanghai, and PFASs with total concentrations of 3.52-37.77 μg/kg were detected in all samples. The detection frequencies for PFDA, PFUnDA, PFDoDA, PFTeDA, and PFOS were 100%. PFDA, PFUnDA, PFOS, and PFDoDA were the most abundant congeners, accounting for 31.2%, 30.6%, 15.0%, and 10.9%, respectively, of the 14 PFASs detected. The proposed method is simple, efficient, accurate, and suitable for the rapid analysis of 14 PFASs in Chinese mitten crabs.

[多孔过滤净化-超高效液相色谱-串联质谱法测定中华绒螯蟹中的 14 种全氟烷基物质]。
全氟烷基物质(PFAS)已成为一个新的食品安全问题。膳食摄入是人类接触 PFASs 的主要途径。中华绒螯蟹(Eriocheir sinensis)是深受中国消费者喜爱的高端水产品。传统的全氟辛烷磺酸萃取方法繁琐耗时,且净化不彻底,无法满足全氟辛烷磺酸检测的要求。本文建立了基于多孔滤芯过滤净化(m-PFC)和超高效液相色谱-串联质谱(UPLC-MS/MS)快速检测中华绒螯蟹中14种PFAS的分析策略。本研究分析的14种PFAS的碳链长度在4至14之间,分别为全氟丁酸(PFBA)、全氟正戊酸(PFPeA)、全氟己酸(PFHxA)、全氟庚酸(PFHpA)、全氟辛酸(PFOA)、全氟壬酸(PFNA)、全氟癸酸 (PFDA)、全氟十一烷酸 (PFUnDA)、全氟十二烷酸 (PFDoDA)、全氟十四烷酸 (PFTeDA)、全氟-1-丁烷磺酸 (PFBS)、全氟-1-己烷磺酸 (PFHxS)、全氟-1-辛烷磺酸 (PFOS) 和全氟-1-癸烷磺酸 (PFDS)。m-PFC 色谱柱采用羧基多壁碳纳米管制备,用于减少样品杂质的干扰。样品用 5 mL 0.1% 甲酸水溶液、15 mL 乙腈和提取盐(2 g Na2SO4 和 2 g NaCl)提取。上清液(10 mL)使用 m-PFC 柱纯化,在氮气下浓缩至接近干燥,然后重新溶解在 1 mL 甲醇中。最后,样品溶液经 0.22 μm 聚丙烯注射器过滤器过滤,用于 UPLC-MS/MS 分析。使用岛津 Shim-pack G1ST-C18 色谱柱(100 mm×2.1 mm,2 μm),以甲醇(A)和 5 mmol/L 乙酸铵水溶液(B)为流动相,通过梯度洗脱分离目标分析物。线性梯度程序如下0-0.5 分钟,10%A-35%A;0.5-3 分钟,35%A-60%A;3-5 分钟,60%A-100%A;5-6.5 分钟,100%A;6.5-7 分钟,100%A-10%A。目标分析物在多重反应监测模式下采用负电喷雾电离进行分析,并采用内标法进行定量分析。本研究对流动相系统以及萃取溶剂、时间、体积和盐进行了优化。以 5 mmol/L 醋酸铵溶液-甲醇体系为流动相时,14 种 PFAS 具有良好的峰形和灵敏度。与单独使用乙腈或甲醇相比,在加入 5 mL 0.1% 甲酸水溶液后再加入 15 mL 乙腈,14 种 PFAS 的萃取效率明显提高。当萃取时间在 3-15 分钟内时,14 种 PFAS 的萃取效率没有明显差异。萃取盐(MgSO4、Na2SO4、NaCl、(NH4)2SO4 和 Na2SO4+NaCl)对 14 种 PFAS 的萃取效率有显著影响。以Na2SO4+NaCl为萃取盐时,14种全氟辛烷磺酸的萃取效率最高,从47.9%到121.9%不等。在最佳实验条件下,7种PFASs(PFBS、PFHxA、PFHpA、PFHxS、PFDA、PFDoDA、PFTeDA)在0.10-100 μg/L、7种PFASs(PFBA、PFPeA、PFOA、PFOS、PFNA、PFUnDA、PFDS)在0.50-100 μg/L的线性关系良好(R2=0.998-0.999)。在3个添加水平下,中华绒螯蟹中14种PFASs的平均加标回收率为73.1%~120%,相对标准偏差为1.68%~19.5%(n=6)。14种全氟辛烷磺酸的检出限(LOD)和定量限(LOQ)分别为0.03~0.15 μg/kg和0.10~0.50 μg/kg。将所建立的方法应用于分析从上海三个养殖场采集的螃蟹样品,所有样品均检出PFASs,总浓度为3.52-37.77 μg/kg。PFDA、PFUnDA、PFDoDA、PFTeDA 和 PFOS 的检出率均为 100%。在检测到的 14 种 PFAS 中,PFDA、PFUnDA、PFOS 和 PFDoDA 的含量最高,分别占 31.2%、30.6%、15.0% 和 10.9%。该方法简便、高效、准确,适用于中华绒螯蟹中14种PFASs的快速分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
色谱
色谱 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
42.90%
发文量
7198
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信