Medicines and other factors causing deaths in English and welsh care homes: five-years of preventing future death reports by coroners

IF 3.6 4区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Malcolm Irons, Asa Auta, Jane Caroline Portlock, Andrea Manfrin
{"title":"Medicines and other factors causing deaths in English and welsh care homes: five-years of preventing future death reports by coroners","authors":"Malcolm Irons, Asa Auta, Jane Caroline Portlock, Andrea Manfrin","doi":"10.1093/pubmed/fdad259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Whilst information has been published on the impact, severity and causes of incidents involving medicines in care homes, it has not been systematically described. This review explored whether coroners’ Preventing Future Death (PFD) reports involving medicines for people living in care homes could add to this evidence base. Methods PFD reports made publicly available between 2017 and 2021 classified as ‘care home-related deaths’ were reviewed. Reports describing medicines and/or medicines processes were identified. Contributory factors within these reports were then identified. Results Within the timeframe, 156 reports were published, and 25 described medicines (n = 27) or medicines processes (n = 5) concerning people living in care homes. The impact of medicines and/or medicines processes was quantified as no impact (n = 7), contributory (n = 6) and direct (n = 14) per report. Two key themes emerged. Four deaths had an association between their falls risk, prescribed anticoagulants, and the failure of the service to seek timely emergency care following a fall and two deaths concerned endocrine medicines, where people refused insulin or blood sugar monitoring and staff did not seek timely advice. Conclusion This study demonstrated PFD reports provide an insight into the potential association between medicines, and other aspects of the person’s care in causing harm.","PeriodicalId":16904,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdad259","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Whilst information has been published on the impact, severity and causes of incidents involving medicines in care homes, it has not been systematically described. This review explored whether coroners’ Preventing Future Death (PFD) reports involving medicines for people living in care homes could add to this evidence base. Methods PFD reports made publicly available between 2017 and 2021 classified as ‘care home-related deaths’ were reviewed. Reports describing medicines and/or medicines processes were identified. Contributory factors within these reports were then identified. Results Within the timeframe, 156 reports were published, and 25 described medicines (n = 27) or medicines processes (n = 5) concerning people living in care homes. The impact of medicines and/or medicines processes was quantified as no impact (n = 7), contributory (n = 6) and direct (n = 14) per report. Two key themes emerged. Four deaths had an association between their falls risk, prescribed anticoagulants, and the failure of the service to seek timely emergency care following a fall and two deaths concerned endocrine medicines, where people refused insulin or blood sugar monitoring and staff did not seek timely advice. Conclusion This study demonstrated PFD reports provide an insight into the potential association between medicines, and other aspects of the person’s care in causing harm.
导致英格兰和威尔士护理院死亡的药物和其他因素:验尸官五年来的预防未来死亡报告
背景 虽然已有关于疗养院药物事故的影响、严重程度和原因的信息发布,但尚未对其进行系统描述。本综述探讨了死因裁判官的 "预防未来死亡"(PFD)报告是否可以为这一证据库增添新的内容。方法 回顾了 2017 年至 2021 年间公开发表的 PFD 报告,这些报告被归类为 "与护理院相关的死亡"。确定了描述药物和/或药物流程的报告。然后确定了这些报告中的促成因素。结果 在该时间段内,共发布了 156 份报告,其中 25 份报告描述了与居住在护理院中的人员有关的药物(n = 27)或用药流程(n = 5)。每份报告对药物和/或药物流程的影响被量化为无影响(7 份)、促成影响(6 份)和直接影响(14 份)。出现了两个关键主题。四例死亡案例与跌倒风险、处方抗凝药以及跌倒后未能及时寻求急救服务有关,两例死亡案例与内分泌药物有关,患者拒绝接受胰岛素或血糖监测,而工作人员没有及时寻求建议。结论 本研究表明,PFD 报告可帮助我们深入了解药物与患者护理的其他方面之间在造成伤害方面的潜在关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Public Health
Journal of Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
2.30%
发文量
120
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Previous Title Zeitschrift für Gesundheitswissenschaften, Previous Print ISSN 0943-1853, Previous Online ISSN 1613-2238. The Journal of Public Health: From Theory to Practice is an interdisciplinary publication for the discussion and debate of international public health issues, with a focus on European affairs. It describes the social and individual factors determining the basic conditions of public health, analyzing causal interrelations, and offering a scientifically sound rationale for personal, social and political measures of intervention. Coverage includes contributions from epidemiology, health economics, environmental health, management, social sciences, ethics, and law. ISSN: 2198-1833 (Print) 1613-2238 (Online)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信