Racism and global war in world politics: As obvious as it is ignored

IF 1.4 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Errol A. Henderson
{"title":"Racism and global war in world politics: As obvious as it is ignored","authors":"Errol A. Henderson","doi":"10.1057/s41311-023-00532-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Contemporaneous theorizing of the Howard School of IR theory on the role of white supremacism in WWI implied a more general relationship between racial imperialism and global war, which we examine in this essay. Taking as its point of departure Rosenau’s (1970) admonition that mainstream IR seemed to ignore issues of racism in world politics even as a ‘surfeit’ of models existed that were applicable to the subject, we attempt to show how the ‘norm against noticing’ racism in IR could’ve been addressed utilizing resources available to Rosenau’s contemporaries more than a half century ago on an issue of major concern to mainstream IR at the time (and today): global war. Our analysis of global wars that were a major focus of mainstream studies of war during the Cold War era (e.g. the War of Jenkins’ Ear, the Seven Years War, the Napoleonic Wars, WWI and WWII) reveals that racism was attendant to these wars with respect to the impact of racial imperialism in each of them. Nevertheless, the relationship between racism and global war has been largely absent in influential studies in IR; and this absence converges not only with the norm against noticing, but calls into question our ability to adequately, much less accurately, account for these wars, in particular, and to build theory that explains important phenomena in IR, more generally.</p>","PeriodicalId":46593,"journal":{"name":"International Politics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-023-00532-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Contemporaneous theorizing of the Howard School of IR theory on the role of white supremacism in WWI implied a more general relationship between racial imperialism and global war, which we examine in this essay. Taking as its point of departure Rosenau’s (1970) admonition that mainstream IR seemed to ignore issues of racism in world politics even as a ‘surfeit’ of models existed that were applicable to the subject, we attempt to show how the ‘norm against noticing’ racism in IR could’ve been addressed utilizing resources available to Rosenau’s contemporaries more than a half century ago on an issue of major concern to mainstream IR at the time (and today): global war. Our analysis of global wars that were a major focus of mainstream studies of war during the Cold War era (e.g. the War of Jenkins’ Ear, the Seven Years War, the Napoleonic Wars, WWI and WWII) reveals that racism was attendant to these wars with respect to the impact of racial imperialism in each of them. Nevertheless, the relationship between racism and global war has been largely absent in influential studies in IR; and this absence converges not only with the norm against noticing, but calls into question our ability to adequately, much less accurately, account for these wars, in particular, and to build theory that explains important phenomena in IR, more generally.

世界政治中的种族主义和全球战争:显而易见却被忽视
与此同时,霍华德国际关系学派(Howard School of IR)关于白人至上主义在第一次世界大战中的作用的理论暗示了种族帝国主义与全球战争之间更为普遍的关系,我们将在本文中对此进行研究。罗森瑙(1970 年)告诫主流国际关系学似乎忽视了世界政治中的种族主义问题,即使存在着适用于这一主题的 "大量 "模型。以罗森瑙(1970 年)的告诫为出发点,我们试图说明如何利用半个多世纪前罗森瑙的同时代人所拥有的资源来解决国际关系学中 "不注意 "种族主义的问题,即当时(以及今天)主流国际关系学主要关注的问题:全球战争。我们对冷战时期主流战争研究重点关注的全球战争(如詹金斯之耳战争、七年战争、拿破仑战争、第一次世界大战和第二次世界大战)进行的分析表明,种族主义与这些战争中种族帝国主义的影响息息相关。然而,在有影响力的国际关系研究中,种族主义与全球战争之间的关系在很大程度上是缺失的;这种缺失不仅与反对忽视的准则相吻合,而且使我们对充分(更不用说准确)解释这些战争的能力,以及更广泛地建立解释国际关系中重要现象的理论的能力产生了怀疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: International Politics?is a leading peer reviewed journal dedicated to transnational issues and global problems. It subscribes to no political or methodological identity and welcomes any appropriate contributions designed to communicate findings and enhance dialogue.International Politics?defines itself as critical in character truly international in scope and totally engaged with the central issues facing the world today. Taking as its point of departure the simple but essential notion that no one approach has all the answers it aims to provide a global forum for a rapidly expanding community of scholars from across the range of academic disciplines.International Politics?aims to encourage debate controversy and reflection. Topics addressed within the journal include:Rethinking the Clash of CivilizationsMyths of WestphaliaHolocaust and ChinaLeo Strauss and the Cold WarJustin Rosenberg and Globalisation TheoryPutin and the WestThe USA Post-BushCan China Rise Peacefully Just WarsCuba Castro and AfterGramsci and IRIs America in Decline。
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信