Supervised Machine Learning Mode for Predicting Gas-Liquid Flow Patterns in Upward Inclined Pipe

IF 0.6 4区 工程技术 Q4 ENERGY & FUELS
Jijun Zhang, Meng Cai, Na Wei, Haibo Liang, Jianlong Wang
{"title":"Supervised Machine Learning Mode for Predicting Gas-Liquid Flow Patterns in Upward Inclined Pipe","authors":"Jijun Zhang, Meng Cai, Na Wei, Haibo Liang, Jianlong Wang","doi":"10.1007/s10553-023-01618-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Accurate identification of gas-liquid two-phase flow patterns during oil and gas drilling is critical to analyzing bottom hole pressure, detecting overflows in time, and preventing blowout accidents. Since the gas-liquid two-phase flow has deformable interfaces, resulting in complex gas-liquid two-phase flow patterns, the existing gas-liquid two-phase flow patterns are limited in width in terms of pipe diameter and incline, leading to adaptation problems in experimental flow patterns and mechanistic models. Machine learning methods provide potential tools for solving gas-liquid two-phase flow pattern identification. In this paper, a sample database with 5879 data points was established by reviewing and organizing existing literature focusing on normal pressure and temperature, and air-water experimental conditions to provide a data-preparation for the relationship between gas and liquid velocities, pipe diameter and incline characteristics and flow pattern objectives. Four machine learning models, including K-Nearest Neighbor, Naïve Bayes, Decision Tree and Random Forest, were investigated, and each model was trained and tested using a sample database to reveal the performance of four types of supervised machine learning methods, representing similarity, probability, inductive inference and ensemble-learning principles, for gas-liquid two-phase flow pattern recognition, and the prediction accuracy was 0.86, Naïve Bayes is 0.56, Decision Tree is 0.89 and Random Forest 0.97. Comprehensive analysis of each model confusion matrix shows that the machine learning method has the best recognition of dispersed bubble flow, better recognition of slug flow, and the worst recognition of churn flow among the nine flow patterns which proves the controversial nature of the mechanism model in the transition from slug flow to churn flow. This paper uses experimental data as model input features, making the machine learning-based gas-liquid two-phase flow pattern identification model meaningful for practical engineering applications, and also demonstrating the feasibility of using supervised machine learning methods for gas-liquid two-phase flow pattern identification at normal pressure and temperature, wide-range of pipe diameter and incline.</p>","PeriodicalId":9908,"journal":{"name":"Chemistry and Technology of Fuels and Oils","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemistry and Technology of Fuels and Oils","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10553-023-01618-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate identification of gas-liquid two-phase flow patterns during oil and gas drilling is critical to analyzing bottom hole pressure, detecting overflows in time, and preventing blowout accidents. Since the gas-liquid two-phase flow has deformable interfaces, resulting in complex gas-liquid two-phase flow patterns, the existing gas-liquid two-phase flow patterns are limited in width in terms of pipe diameter and incline, leading to adaptation problems in experimental flow patterns and mechanistic models. Machine learning methods provide potential tools for solving gas-liquid two-phase flow pattern identification. In this paper, a sample database with 5879 data points was established by reviewing and organizing existing literature focusing on normal pressure and temperature, and air-water experimental conditions to provide a data-preparation for the relationship between gas and liquid velocities, pipe diameter and incline characteristics and flow pattern objectives. Four machine learning models, including K-Nearest Neighbor, Naïve Bayes, Decision Tree and Random Forest, were investigated, and each model was trained and tested using a sample database to reveal the performance of four types of supervised machine learning methods, representing similarity, probability, inductive inference and ensemble-learning principles, for gas-liquid two-phase flow pattern recognition, and the prediction accuracy was 0.86, Naïve Bayes is 0.56, Decision Tree is 0.89 and Random Forest 0.97. Comprehensive analysis of each model confusion matrix shows that the machine learning method has the best recognition of dispersed bubble flow, better recognition of slug flow, and the worst recognition of churn flow among the nine flow patterns which proves the controversial nature of the mechanism model in the transition from slug flow to churn flow. This paper uses experimental data as model input features, making the machine learning-based gas-liquid two-phase flow pattern identification model meaningful for practical engineering applications, and also demonstrating the feasibility of using supervised machine learning methods for gas-liquid two-phase flow pattern identification at normal pressure and temperature, wide-range of pipe diameter and incline.

Abstract Image

用于预测向上倾斜管道中气液流动模式的监督式机器学习模式
在石油和天然气钻井过程中,准确识别气液两相流模式对于分析井底压力、及时发现溢流和防止井喷事故至关重要。由于气液两相流具有可变形的界面,导致气液两相流形态复杂,现有的气液两相流形态在管径和倾斜度方面的宽度有限,导致实验流型和机理模型的适应性问题。机器学习方法为解决气液两相流模式识别问题提供了潜在工具。本文通过查阅和整理现有文献,建立了一个包含 5879 个数据点的样本数据库,重点关注常压和常温以及空气-水实验条件,为气体和液体速度、管道直径和倾斜度特征与流动模式目标之间的关系提供数据准备。研究了 K-近邻、奈夫贝叶斯、决策树和随机森林等四种机器学习模型,并利用样本数据库对每种模型进行了训练和测试,揭示了代表相似性、概率、归纳推理和集合学习原理的四种监督机器学习方法在气液两相流模式识别中的性能,预测精度分别为 0.86、奈夫贝叶斯为 0.56、决策树为 0.89 和随机森林为 0.97。对各模型混淆矩阵的综合分析表明,在九种流动模式中,机器学习方法对分散气泡流的识别效果最好,对蛞蝓流的识别效果较好,而对搅动流的识别效果最差,这证明了机理模型在从蛞蝓流向搅动流过渡过程中的争议性。本文将实验数据作为模型的输入特征,使基于机器学习的气液两相流模式识别模型在实际工程应用中具有意义,同时也证明了在常压常温、大范围管径和倾斜度条件下使用有监督机器学习方法进行气液两相流模式识别的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chemistry and Technology of Fuels and Oils
Chemistry and Technology of Fuels and Oils 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
119
审稿时长
1.0 months
期刊介绍: Chemistry and Technology of Fuels and Oils publishes reports on improvements in the processing of petroleum and natural gas and cracking and refining techniques for the production of high-quality fuels, oils, greases, specialty fluids, additives and synthetics. The journal includes timely articles on the demulsification, desalting, and desulfurizing of crude oil; new flow plans for refineries; platforming, isomerization, catalytic reforming, and alkylation processes for obtaining aromatic hydrocarbons and high-octane gasoline; methods of producing ethylene, acetylene, benzene, acids, alcohols, esters, and other compounds from petroleum, as well as hydrogen from natural gas and liquid products.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信