Place attributes and company names: an empirical and conceptual study into public branding and business strategies

IF 1.8 Q3 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM
Narcís Bassols i Gardella, Christian Acevedo, Catalina Orjuela Martínez
{"title":"Place attributes and company names: an empirical and conceptual study into public branding and business strategies","authors":"Narcís Bassols i Gardella, Christian Acevedo, Catalina Orjuela Martínez","doi":"10.1108/jpmd-03-2023-0023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This research finds out to what extent companies’ names are influenced by the place’s attributes versus the official branding policies of a place and, consequently, whether and how local companies “buy into” the place’s strategies put forth by official bodies.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>This paper is both conceptual and empirical, as a mixed quantitative and interpretive approach is used. The companies’ names of a tourist industry (the tour and guiding companies) in three destinations are compared and pitched against the branding of these cities. The companies' names are classified into categories to ascertain whether they reflect (or diverge from) the official strategies. Finally, a conceptual model is developed to explain the findings: the strategic naming model (SNM).</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>Our main finding is that the overall business features of a place being stronger determinants to the naming strategies than tourist destination branding initiatives. The intrinsic features of a place seem thus to be “above” destination branding policies. The researched features account for different naming strategies, such as highly original names, flat names or non-strategic names.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>As the work is based on a convenience sample, it cannot claim strong representativity. The fact that each of the three data sets was processed by a different researcher might bring up personal biases.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>This work is a call for a more intensive use of naming strategies to the companies’ advantages, as naming is found out to be strategy used to a very low degree. Thanks to this research, companies will understand the different naming possibilities and be able to apply them to their strategies by choosing names which express “uniqueness” or “belonging”. Practitioners will also be aware of whether they are communicating towards the industry or towards the market.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>No works were found that empirically pursue our research goals. Therefore, this research might be considered as a novelty. The proposed SNM model explains and relates the most usual company naming techniques, which were unrelated up to date.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":46966,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Place Management and Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Place Management and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jpmd-03-2023-0023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This research finds out to what extent companies’ names are influenced by the place’s attributes versus the official branding policies of a place and, consequently, whether and how local companies “buy into” the place’s strategies put forth by official bodies.

Design/methodology/approach

This paper is both conceptual and empirical, as a mixed quantitative and interpretive approach is used. The companies’ names of a tourist industry (the tour and guiding companies) in three destinations are compared and pitched against the branding of these cities. The companies' names are classified into categories to ascertain whether they reflect (or diverge from) the official strategies. Finally, a conceptual model is developed to explain the findings: the strategic naming model (SNM).

Findings

Our main finding is that the overall business features of a place being stronger determinants to the naming strategies than tourist destination branding initiatives. The intrinsic features of a place seem thus to be “above” destination branding policies. The researched features account for different naming strategies, such as highly original names, flat names or non-strategic names.

Research limitations/implications

As the work is based on a convenience sample, it cannot claim strong representativity. The fact that each of the three data sets was processed by a different researcher might bring up personal biases.

Practical implications

This work is a call for a more intensive use of naming strategies to the companies’ advantages, as naming is found out to be strategy used to a very low degree. Thanks to this research, companies will understand the different naming possibilities and be able to apply them to their strategies by choosing names which express “uniqueness” or “belonging”. Practitioners will also be aware of whether they are communicating towards the industry or towards the market.

Originality/value

No works were found that empirically pursue our research goals. Therefore, this research might be considered as a novelty. The proposed SNM model explains and relates the most usual company naming techniques, which were unrelated up to date.

地方属性与公司名称:关于公共品牌和商业战略的实证与概念研究
研究目的:本研究探讨了公司名称在多大程度上受地方属性与地方官方品牌政策的影响,以及地方公司是否以及如何 "接受 "官方机构提出的地方战略。本文比较了三个旅游目的地旅游业的公司名称(旅游公司和导游公司),并将其与这些城市的品牌建设相比较。对公司名称进行分类,以确定它们是否反映(或偏离)了官方战略。最后,建立了一个概念模型来解释研究结果:战略命名模型(SNM)。研究结果我们的主要发现是,一个地方的整体商业特征比旅游目的地的品牌倡议更能决定命名战略。因此,一个地方的内在特征似乎 "高于 "目的地品牌政策。所研究的特征决定了不同的命名策略,如高度原创的名称、扁平化的名称或非战略性的名称。由于三个数据集分别由不同的研究人员处理,因此可能会产生个人偏见。实际意义这项研究呼吁企业更深入地使用命名策略,因为发现命名策略的使用程度很低。通过这项研究,企业将了解不同命名的可能性,并能够通过选择表达 "独特性 "或 "归属感 "的名称将其应用到战略中。从业人员也将意识到他们是在面向行业还是面向市场进行交流。因此,本研究可被视为一项创新。所提出的 SNM 模型解释并关联了最常见的公司命名技术,而这些技术迄今为止都没有关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Place Management and Development
Journal of Place Management and Development HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
16
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信