An Enhanced Interactive and Multi-criteria Decision-Making (TODIM) Method with Probabilistic Dual Hesitant Fuzzy Sets for Risk Evaluation of Arctic Geopolitics

IF 4.3 3区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Chenyang Song, Zeshui Xu, Yixin Zhang
{"title":"An Enhanced Interactive and Multi-criteria Decision-Making (TODIM) Method with Probabilistic Dual Hesitant Fuzzy Sets for Risk Evaluation of Arctic Geopolitics","authors":"Chenyang Song, Zeshui Xu, Yixin Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s12559-023-10229-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The psychological factors of experts play a special role in the process of decision-making, especially in some situations that experts are not completely rational. Traditional decision-making methods always just focus on the aggregation of positive preference information, which do not take the negative attribute information into account at the same time. The probabilistic dual hesitant fuzzy set (PDHFS) is one of the latest fuzzy sets, which can depict experts’ positive and negative preference information with the corresponding probability at the same time. Therefore, to manage the applications with incomplete rationality and two opposite kinds of uncertain preference information, this paper considers the influence of psychological behavior on decision-making results and introduces an interactive method based on the prospect theory. Taking the advantages of PDHFSs in group decision-making problems, we propose the distance measure of PDHFSs, based on which an improved TODIM (TOmada deDecisão Iterativa Multicritério) method under the probabilistic dual hesitant fuzzy environment is also developed. Meanwhile, we provide the specific implementation process of the proposed method. The proposed improved TODIM is applied to the risk evaluation of Arctic geopolitics. We also make a comparison with the traditional aggregation method of PDHFSs. The difference among alternatives obtained by the proposed TODIM method with prospect theory is much greater than the traditional aggregation methods without prospect theory. This paper highlights the benefits and advantages of the proposed TODIM method that is developed based on the prospect theory and probabilistic dual hesitant fuzzy distance measure.</p>","PeriodicalId":51243,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Computation","volume":"76 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Computation","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-023-10229-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The psychological factors of experts play a special role in the process of decision-making, especially in some situations that experts are not completely rational. Traditional decision-making methods always just focus on the aggregation of positive preference information, which do not take the negative attribute information into account at the same time. The probabilistic dual hesitant fuzzy set (PDHFS) is one of the latest fuzzy sets, which can depict experts’ positive and negative preference information with the corresponding probability at the same time. Therefore, to manage the applications with incomplete rationality and two opposite kinds of uncertain preference information, this paper considers the influence of psychological behavior on decision-making results and introduces an interactive method based on the prospect theory. Taking the advantages of PDHFSs in group decision-making problems, we propose the distance measure of PDHFSs, based on which an improved TODIM (TOmada deDecisão Iterativa Multicritério) method under the probabilistic dual hesitant fuzzy environment is also developed. Meanwhile, we provide the specific implementation process of the proposed method. The proposed improved TODIM is applied to the risk evaluation of Arctic geopolitics. We also make a comparison with the traditional aggregation method of PDHFSs. The difference among alternatives obtained by the proposed TODIM method with prospect theory is much greater than the traditional aggregation methods without prospect theory. This paper highlights the benefits and advantages of the proposed TODIM method that is developed based on the prospect theory and probabilistic dual hesitant fuzzy distance measure.

Abstract Image

用概率双隐含模糊集进行北极地缘政治风险评估的增强型互动和多标准决策(TODIM)方法
专家的心理因素在决策过程中起着特殊的作用,尤其是在某些专家并非完全理性的情况下。传统的决策方法总是只注重正面偏好信息的汇总,而没有同时考虑负面属性信息。概率双犹豫模糊集(PDHFS)是最新的模糊集之一,它可以同时用相应的概率来描述专家的积极和消极偏好信息。因此,为了管理不完全理性和两种相反的不确定偏好信息的应用,本文考虑了心理行为对决策结果的影响,并引入了一种基于前景理论的交互方法。利用 PDHFS 在群体决策问题中的优势,我们提出了 PDHFS 的距离度量,并在此基础上开发了概率双犹豫模糊环境下的改进 TODIM(TOmada deDecisão Iterativa Multicritério)方法。同时,我们还提供了所提方法的具体实现过程。提出的改进 TODIM 被应用于北极地缘政治的风险评估。我们还与传统的 PDHFS 聚合方法进行了比较。与不使用前景理论的传统聚合方法相比,使用包含前景理论的 TODIM 方法得到的备选方案之间的差异要大得多。本文强调了基于前景理论和概率双犹豫模糊距离度量开发的 TODIM 方法的优点和优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cognitive Computation
Cognitive Computation COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
116
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cognitive Computation is an international, peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary journal that publishes cutting-edge articles describing original basic and applied work involving biologically-inspired computational accounts of all aspects of natural and artificial cognitive systems. It provides a new platform for the dissemination of research, current practices and future trends in the emerging discipline of cognitive computation that bridges the gap between life sciences, social sciences, engineering, physical and mathematical sciences, and humanities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信