Factors influencing referral to maternity models of care in Australian general practice

Jaime Thomas, Lesley Kuliukas, Jacqueline Frayne, Zoe Bradfield
{"title":"Factors influencing referral to maternity models of care in Australian general practice","authors":"Jaime Thomas, Lesley Kuliukas, Jacqueline Frayne, Zoe Bradfield","doi":"10.1101/2023.12.16.23300085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: In the Australian maternity system, general practitioners play a vital role in advising and directing prospective parents to maternity models of care. Optimising model of care discussions and the decision-making process avoids misaligning women with over or under specialised care, reduces the potential for disruptive care transitions and unnecessary healthcare costs, and is critical in ensuring consumer satisfaction. Current literature overwhelmingly focusses on women’s decision-making around model of care discussions and neglects the gatekeeping role of the General Practitioner (GP). This study aimed to explore and describe the factors influencing Australian GPs decision-making when referring pregnant women to maternity models of care.\nMethods: This study used a qualitative descriptive approach. General practitioners (N=12) with experience referring women to maternity models of care in Australia participated in a semi-structured interview. Interviews occurred between October and November 2021 by telephone or videoconference. Reflexive thematic analysis was facilitated by NVivo-12 data management software to codify and interpret themes from the data.\nFindings: Two broad themes were interpreted from the data. The first theme entitled ‘GP Factors’, incorporated three associated sub-themes including ‘GPs Previous Model of Care Experience’, ‘Gaps in GP Knowledge’ and ‘GP Perception of Models of Care’. The second theme, entitled ‘Woman’s Factors’, encapsulated two associated sub-themes including the ‘Woman’s Preferences’ and ‘Access to Models’.\nConclusions: This study provides novel evidence regarding general practitioner perspectives of the factors influencing model of care decision-making and referral. The exploration and description of factors influencing model of care decisions provide unique insight into the ways that all stakeholders can experience access to a broader range of models of care including midwifery-led continuity of care models aligned with consumer-demand. In addition, the role of national primary health networks is outlined as a means to achieving this.","PeriodicalId":501409,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Obstetrics and Gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Obstetrics and Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.12.16.23300085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In the Australian maternity system, general practitioners play a vital role in advising and directing prospective parents to maternity models of care. Optimising model of care discussions and the decision-making process avoids misaligning women with over or under specialised care, reduces the potential for disruptive care transitions and unnecessary healthcare costs, and is critical in ensuring consumer satisfaction. Current literature overwhelmingly focusses on women’s decision-making around model of care discussions and neglects the gatekeeping role of the General Practitioner (GP). This study aimed to explore and describe the factors influencing Australian GPs decision-making when referring pregnant women to maternity models of care. Methods: This study used a qualitative descriptive approach. General practitioners (N=12) with experience referring women to maternity models of care in Australia participated in a semi-structured interview. Interviews occurred between October and November 2021 by telephone or videoconference. Reflexive thematic analysis was facilitated by NVivo-12 data management software to codify and interpret themes from the data. Findings: Two broad themes were interpreted from the data. The first theme entitled ‘GP Factors’, incorporated three associated sub-themes including ‘GPs Previous Model of Care Experience’, ‘Gaps in GP Knowledge’ and ‘GP Perception of Models of Care’. The second theme, entitled ‘Woman’s Factors’, encapsulated two associated sub-themes including the ‘Woman’s Preferences’ and ‘Access to Models’. Conclusions: This study provides novel evidence regarding general practitioner perspectives of the factors influencing model of care decision-making and referral. The exploration and description of factors influencing model of care decisions provide unique insight into the ways that all stakeholders can experience access to a broader range of models of care including midwifery-led continuity of care models aligned with consumer-demand. In addition, the role of national primary health networks is outlined as a means to achieving this.
影响澳大利亚全科医生转诊到孕产妇护理模式的因素
背景:在澳大利亚的孕产妇系统中,全科医生在建议和引导准父母选择孕产妇护理模式方面发挥着至关重要的作用。优化护理模式的讨论和决策过程可以避免将妇女与过度或过度专业化的护理错位,降低护理过渡的破坏性和不必要的医疗成本,对于确保消费者满意度至关重要。目前的文献绝大多数集中在妇女围绕护理模式讨论所做的决策上,而忽视了全科医生(GP)的把关作用。本研究旨在探讨和描述影响澳大利亚全科医生在将孕妇转诊至孕产妇护理模式时做出决策的因素:本研究采用定性描述法。具有将妇女转介到澳大利亚孕产妇护理模式经验的全科医生(12 人)参加了半结构化访谈。访谈于 2021 年 10 月至 11 月间通过电话或视频会议进行。NVivo-12 数据管理软件帮助进行了反思性主题分析,对数据中的主题进行编码和解释:从数据中解读出两大主题。第一个主题名为 "全科医生因素",包含三个相关的次主题,包括 "全科医生以往的护理模式经验"、"全科医生知识差距 "和 "全科医生对护理模式的看法"。第二个主题名为 "妇女因素",包含两个相关的次主题,包括 "妇女的偏好 "和 "获得模式":本研究就全科医生对影响护理模式决策和转诊的因素的看法提供了新的证据。对影响护理模式决策的因素的探讨和描述,为所有利益相关者体验更广泛的护理模式(包括助产士主导的符合消费者需求的持续护理模式)提供了独特的见解。此外,还概述了国家初级保健网络在实现这一目标方面的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信