Recreational Disturbance of River Sediments During Base Flow Deteriorates Microbial Water Quality

IF 2.6 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Isabelle Pattis, Elaine Moriarty, Juliet Anderson, Angus McIntosh, Brent Gilpin
{"title":"Recreational Disturbance of River Sediments During Base Flow Deteriorates Microbial Water Quality","authors":"Isabelle Pattis, Elaine Moriarty, Juliet Anderson, Angus McIntosh, Brent Gilpin","doi":"10.1007/s41742-023-00557-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Recreational water quality of rivers is typically assessed by microbial analysis of indicator organisms, such as <i>Escherichia coli</i> and enterococci in samples collected directly from the water column, implying that risk to public health comes from free-floating microorganisms. In New Zealand, the Recreational Water Quality Guidelines apply certain <i>E. coli</i> concentration thresholds to categorize results into ‘meet guidelines’ (≤ 260 cfu <i>E. coli</i> 100 mL<sup>−1</sup>), ‘alert level’, and ‘action level’ (≥ 550 cfu <i>E. coli</i> 100 mL<sup>−1</sup>). The impairment of water quality due to re-suspended riverbed sediment under flood conditions has been widely recognized. However, the potential risks posed by sediment-linked microorganisms associated with river recreational activities under base flow are less appreciated. We evaluated the water quality of 30 rivers in Canterbury, New Zealand, during base flow conditions prior to and after artificially stirring the sediment. Bacterial and protozoan indicators, pathogens, water quality, and land use in surrounding areas were examined. While 71% of water samples (<i>n</i> = 64) met New Zealand Recreational Water guidelines prior to stirring, only 39% of samples (<i>n</i> = 35) met the guidelines after stirring. <i>E. coli</i> levels increased by 110%, or more, following sediment stirring. <i>Campylobacter</i> were detected in every river, at least once, and increases were observed following stirring. We conclude that sediment-associated microbes become suspended by recreational activities and may pose a higher risk than previously thought to river users. To ensure public health is protected, authorities should assess microorganisms in both sediment and water samples to rate the microbiological risk of recreational water use.</p>","PeriodicalId":14121,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Environmental Research","volume":"34 4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Environmental Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41742-023-00557-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recreational water quality of rivers is typically assessed by microbial analysis of indicator organisms, such as Escherichia coli and enterococci in samples collected directly from the water column, implying that risk to public health comes from free-floating microorganisms. In New Zealand, the Recreational Water Quality Guidelines apply certain E. coli concentration thresholds to categorize results into ‘meet guidelines’ (≤ 260 cfu E. coli 100 mL−1), ‘alert level’, and ‘action level’ (≥ 550 cfu E. coli 100 mL−1). The impairment of water quality due to re-suspended riverbed sediment under flood conditions has been widely recognized. However, the potential risks posed by sediment-linked microorganisms associated with river recreational activities under base flow are less appreciated. We evaluated the water quality of 30 rivers in Canterbury, New Zealand, during base flow conditions prior to and after artificially stirring the sediment. Bacterial and protozoan indicators, pathogens, water quality, and land use in surrounding areas were examined. While 71% of water samples (n = 64) met New Zealand Recreational Water guidelines prior to stirring, only 39% of samples (n = 35) met the guidelines after stirring. E. coli levels increased by 110%, or more, following sediment stirring. Campylobacter were detected in every river, at least once, and increases were observed following stirring. We conclude that sediment-associated microbes become suspended by recreational activities and may pose a higher risk than previously thought to river users. To ensure public health is protected, authorities should assess microorganisms in both sediment and water samples to rate the microbiological risk of recreational water use.

Abstract Image

基流期间对河流沉积物的娱乐性扰动会导致微生物水质恶化
河流的休闲水质通常是通过对直接从水体中采集的样本中的大肠杆菌和肠球菌等指示生物进行微生物分析来评估的,这意味着对公众健康的风险来自于自由漂浮的微生物。在新西兰,《休闲水质指南》采用一定的大肠杆菌浓度阈值,将结果分为 "符合指南"(≤ 260 cfu E. coli 100 mL-1)、"警戒级别 "和 "行动级别"(≥ 550 cfu E. coli 100 mL-1)。人们普遍认识到,洪水条件下重新悬浮的河床沉积物会对水质造成损害。然而,在基流条件下,与河道娱乐活动相关的沉积物微生物所带来的潜在风险却鲜为人知。我们对新西兰坎特伯雷 30 条河流在基流条件下人工搅拌沉积物之前和之后的水质进行了评估。我们研究了细菌和原生动物指标、病原体、水质以及周边地区的土地利用情况。在搅拌前,71% 的水样(n = 64)符合新西兰休闲水准则,而在搅拌后,只有 39% 的水样(n = 35)符合准则。搅拌沉积物后,大肠杆菌含量增加了 110% 或更多。在每条河流中都至少检测到一次弯曲杆菌,而且在搅拌后检测到的弯曲杆菌数量也有所增加。我们的结论是,与沉积物相关的微生物会因娱乐活动而悬浮,对河流使用者造成的风险可能比之前想象的要高。为确保公众健康得到保护,有关部门应评估沉积物和水样中的微生物,以评估娱乐性用水的微生物风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
104
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: International Journal of Environmental Research is a multidisciplinary journal concerned with all aspects of environment. In pursuit of these, environmentalist disciplines are invited to contribute their knowledge and experience. International Journal of Environmental Research publishes original research papers, research notes and reviews across the broad field of environment. These include but are not limited to environmental science, environmental engineering, environmental management and planning and environmental design, urban and regional landscape design and natural disaster management. Thus high quality research papers or reviews dealing with any aspect of environment are welcomed. Papers may be theoretical, interpretative or experimental.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信