Improved analytic method for outrigger structures considering floor stiffness

Lin Chen, Ping Tan, Xiaofeng Zhao, Yafei Xu, Fulin Zhou
{"title":"Improved analytic method for outrigger structures considering floor stiffness","authors":"Lin Chen, Ping Tan, Xiaofeng Zhao, Yafei Xu, Fulin Zhou","doi":"10.1002/tal.2076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Current analytical models for outrigger structures in super high-rise buildings tend to oversimplify by not considering the stiffness of individual floors. This paper introduces a more refined calculation model, based on the substructure method, which takes floor stiffness into account. To verify our proposed approach, we derived a mathematical algorithm and developed a finite element model using ANSYS. When compared to traditional methods that only account for outrigger stiffness, our model, which incorporates both outrigger and floor stiffness, provides improved accuracy in calculating vertex displacement. It also suggests an upward shift in the optimal position for the outrigger and bolsters the overall building's lateral stiffness. To further our analysis, we introduced an equivalent stiffness calculation formula, using the Bayesian parameter estimation method. When applied to dynamic analysis, this formula aligns closely with the results from the finite element simulations. Furthermore, the suggested algorithm for determining the best position for the outrigger is consistent with theoretical calculations. By considering the contribution of regular floors to the overall structure, we found that the fitted equivalent core tube stiffness offers a reliable reflection of structural stiffness. Lastly, when this equivalent stiffness was applied to a dynamic analysis based on Rayleigh's energy method, there was a noticeable reduction in computational effort. This yields not only more efficient calculations but also precise results, rendering it particularly valuable during the initial design phases of high-rise buildings.","PeriodicalId":501238,"journal":{"name":"The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.2076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Current analytical models for outrigger structures in super high-rise buildings tend to oversimplify by not considering the stiffness of individual floors. This paper introduces a more refined calculation model, based on the substructure method, which takes floor stiffness into account. To verify our proposed approach, we derived a mathematical algorithm and developed a finite element model using ANSYS. When compared to traditional methods that only account for outrigger stiffness, our model, which incorporates both outrigger and floor stiffness, provides improved accuracy in calculating vertex displacement. It also suggests an upward shift in the optimal position for the outrigger and bolsters the overall building's lateral stiffness. To further our analysis, we introduced an equivalent stiffness calculation formula, using the Bayesian parameter estimation method. When applied to dynamic analysis, this formula aligns closely with the results from the finite element simulations. Furthermore, the suggested algorithm for determining the best position for the outrigger is consistent with theoretical calculations. By considering the contribution of regular floors to the overall structure, we found that the fitted equivalent core tube stiffness offers a reliable reflection of structural stiffness. Lastly, when this equivalent stiffness was applied to a dynamic analysis based on Rayleigh's energy method, there was a noticeable reduction in computational effort. This yields not only more efficient calculations but also precise results, rendering it particularly valuable during the initial design phases of high-rise buildings.
考虑楼板刚度的支腿结构改进分析方法
超高层建筑支腿结构的现有分析模型往往过于简单,没有考虑各个楼层的刚度。本文介绍了一种基于下部结构法的更精细的计算模型,该模型考虑了楼层刚度。为了验证我们提出的方法,我们推导了一种数学算法,并使用 ANSYS 建立了一个有限元模型。与只考虑支腿刚度的传统方法相比,我们的模型同时考虑了支腿刚度和楼板刚度,提高了顶点位移的计算精度。此外,它还表明支腿的最佳位置向上移动,并增强了整个建筑物的横向刚度。为了进一步分析,我们采用贝叶斯参数估计法,引入了等效刚度计算公式。当应用于动态分析时,该公式与有限元模拟的结果非常吻合。此外,所建议的确定支腿最佳位置的算法也与理论计算结果一致。通过考虑规则楼层对整体结构的贡献,我们发现拟合的等效核心筒刚度能够可靠地反映结构刚度。最后,将等效刚度应用于基于瑞利能量法的动态分析时,计算量明显减少。这不仅提高了计算效率,而且得到了精确的结果,在高层建筑的初始设计阶段尤为重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信