COVID-19 pandemic experiences of group home residents with intellectual disabilities: Findings from inclusive, qualitative interviews with self-advocates in Massachusetts

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Matthew S. Smith, Anne Fracht, Diana Mairose, Anthony Phillips, Michael Ashley Stein
{"title":"COVID-19 pandemic experiences of group home residents with intellectual disabilities: Findings from inclusive, qualitative interviews with self-advocates in Massachusetts","authors":"Matthew S. Smith,&nbsp;Anne Fracht,&nbsp;Diana Mairose,&nbsp;Anthony Phillips,&nbsp;Michael Ashley Stein","doi":"10.1111/jppi.12478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Little research on the experiences of persons with intellectual disabilities (ID) during the COVID-19 pandemic has been done by persons with ID themselves. Moreover, little research focuses on group home residents with ID, despite the greater risks they faced of COVID-19 transmission and mortality. To address these gaps, researchers with and without ID organized qualitative interviews and a focus group discussion with six group home residents with ID in Massachusetts. Study participants identified as self-advocates and reported feelings of frustration and isolation that at times were exacerbated by community access restrictions imposed by their group homes. All participants described group home staff efforts to keep them physically safe, while some reported lapses that contributed to their risk of contracting COVID-19. None described comparable efforts to address their social and mental health needs. All participants received information about COVID-19 and related precautions from group home staff, but none reported receiving information about heightened risks of contracting COVID-19 while living in group settings. Also, notwithstanding pandemic-related challenges, most participants identified at least one positive change in their lives, either by changing where they lived or worked or by forging new relationships. Participants' perspectives, as presented to researchers with ID, shed unique light on the range of group home residents' pandemic experiences, signal opportunities for interventions addressing social isolation, and underscore the efficacy of inclusive research methods in eliciting information from research participants with ID.</p>","PeriodicalId":47236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities","volume":"20 4","pages":"405-414"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jppi.12478","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Little research on the experiences of persons with intellectual disabilities (ID) during the COVID-19 pandemic has been done by persons with ID themselves. Moreover, little research focuses on group home residents with ID, despite the greater risks they faced of COVID-19 transmission and mortality. To address these gaps, researchers with and without ID organized qualitative interviews and a focus group discussion with six group home residents with ID in Massachusetts. Study participants identified as self-advocates and reported feelings of frustration and isolation that at times were exacerbated by community access restrictions imposed by their group homes. All participants described group home staff efforts to keep them physically safe, while some reported lapses that contributed to their risk of contracting COVID-19. None described comparable efforts to address their social and mental health needs. All participants received information about COVID-19 and related precautions from group home staff, but none reported receiving information about heightened risks of contracting COVID-19 while living in group settings. Also, notwithstanding pandemic-related challenges, most participants identified at least one positive change in their lives, either by changing where they lived or worked or by forging new relationships. Participants' perspectives, as presented to researchers with ID, shed unique light on the range of group home residents' pandemic experiences, signal opportunities for interventions addressing social isolation, and underscore the efficacy of inclusive research methods in eliciting information from research participants with ID.

COVID-19 大流行对智障集体之家居民的影响:对马萨诸塞州自我倡导者的包容性定性访谈结果
关于智障人士在 COVID-19 大流行期间的经历,智障人士自己所做的研究很少。此外,尽管智障人士面临的 COVID-19 传播和死亡风险更大,但很少有研究关注智障人士集体之家的居民。为了填补这些空白,研究人员与马萨诸塞州的六位智障人士组织了定性访谈和焦点小组讨论。研究参与者自称是自我倡导者,并报告了他们的挫败感和孤独感,这些挫败感和孤独感有时会因集体之家施加的社区准入限制而加剧。所有参与者都描述了疗养院工作人员在保证他们人身安全方面所做的努力,但也有一些人报告说,这些努力的失误导致了他们感染 COVID-19 的风险。没有人描述过在满足他们的社会和心理健康需求方面所做的类似努力。所有参与者都从集体之家的工作人员那里获得了有关 COVID-19 和相关预防措施的信息,但没有人报告说他们在集体生活中获得了有关感染 COVID-19 的更高风险的信息。此外,尽管面临与大流行相关的挑战,但大多数参与者认为他们的生活至少发生了一次积极的变化,或是改变了居住或工作地点,或是建立了新的人际关系。智障研究人员从参与者的角度了解了集体之家居民的各种大流行经历,为解决社会隔离问题的干预措施提供了机会,并强调了包容性研究方法在从智障研究参与者那里获取信息方面的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
38
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信