{"title":"Palaeolithic rock art from Mghvimevi, western Georgia","authors":"L. Losaberidze , A. Zavradashvili , V. Kenkadze","doi":"10.1016/j.ara.2023.100499","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>The Caucasus region, located at the juncture of the European and Asian continents, is an area that has already seen, from an archaeological perspective, the passage of people and cultures over a long period of time and is of key importance in helping us better understand the global rock art phenomenon. Palaeolithic rock art from this region had previously only been known from Gobustan, Azerbaijan. However, prior to the discovery of this extensive site by I. Jafarzade in 1939, Russian archaeologist S. Zamyatnin found Palaeolithic </span>engravings in Mghvimevi rock shelter near the town of Chiatura, western Georgia, in 1934. Until now, this key discovery was neglected, even believed to be destroyed. In 2022, a re-examination of the </span>cave and rock shelter sites in Western Georgia, specifically in the municipality of Chiatura, with a major focus on Mghvimevi, successfully relocated the rock art site. As a result, this previously forgotten discovery has been brought to light.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51847,"journal":{"name":"Archaeological Research in Asia","volume":"37 ","pages":"Article 100499"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archaeological Research in Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352226723000715","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The Caucasus region, located at the juncture of the European and Asian continents, is an area that has already seen, from an archaeological perspective, the passage of people and cultures over a long period of time and is of key importance in helping us better understand the global rock art phenomenon. Palaeolithic rock art from this region had previously only been known from Gobustan, Azerbaijan. However, prior to the discovery of this extensive site by I. Jafarzade in 1939, Russian archaeologist S. Zamyatnin found Palaeolithic engravings in Mghvimevi rock shelter near the town of Chiatura, western Georgia, in 1934. Until now, this key discovery was neglected, even believed to be destroyed. In 2022, a re-examination of the cave and rock shelter sites in Western Georgia, specifically in the municipality of Chiatura, with a major focus on Mghvimevi, successfully relocated the rock art site. As a result, this previously forgotten discovery has been brought to light.
期刊介绍:
Archaeological Research in Asia presents high quality scholarly research conducted in between the Bosporus and the Pacific on a broad range of archaeological subjects of importance to audiences across Asia and around the world. The journal covers the traditional components of archaeology: placing events and patterns in time and space; analysis of past lifeways; and explanations for cultural processes and change. To this end, the publication will highlight theoretical and methodological advances in studying the past, present new data, and detail patterns that reshape our understanding of it. Archaeological Research in Asia publishes work on the full temporal range of archaeological inquiry from the earliest human presence in Asia with a special emphasis on time periods under-represented in other venues. Journal contributions are of three kinds: articles, case reports and short communications. Full length articles should present synthetic treatments, novel analyses, or theoretical approaches to unresolved issues. Case reports present basic data on subjects that are of broad interest because they represent key sites, sequences, and subjects that figure prominently, or should figure prominently, in how scholars both inside and outside Asia understand the archaeology of cultural and biological change through time. Short communications present new findings (e.g., radiocarbon dates) that are important to the extent that they reaffirm or change the way scholars in Asia and around the world think about Asian cultural or biological history.