Rain of Ash: Roma, Jews, and the Holocaust by Ari Joskowicz (review)

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Natasza Gawlick
{"title":"Rain of Ash: Roma, Jews, and the Holocaust by Ari Joskowicz (review)","authors":"Natasza Gawlick","doi":"10.1353/oas.2023.a914888","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Rain of Ash: Roma, Jews, and the Holocaust</em> by Ari Joskowicz <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Natasza Gawlick </li> </ul> Ari Joskowicz, <em>Rain of Ash: Roma, Jews, and the Holocaust</em>. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP, 2023. 351 pp. <p>In his incisive monograph, <em>Rain of Ash: Roma, Jews, and the Holocaust</em>, published by Princeton UP in 2023, Ari Joskowicz explores the related experiences of Jews and Roma within the context of the Holocaust, with a particular focus on institutions that play a role in justice, representation, and advocacy. Over the course of six chapters (not including the introduction), Joskowicz traces the simultaneously distinct and intertwined fates of Roma and Jews before, during, and after the Holocaust. As the author states in his preface, this is not a book on memory, nor a book based on his Jewish ancestors' legacy (xi). Rather, Joskowicz is sensitive to issues of self-representation and the differing levels of recognition given to various victim groups by investigating the following questions: How do we know about the suffering of others? What role do institutions (and individuals), political entities, financial means, and testimonies play in the production of knowledge, history, and memory?</p> <p>Joskowicz approaches these questions by discussing specific examples of Roma-Jewish relations, interactions, or observations in each of his chapters. Following the introduction, which naturally lays out the text's purpose and fundamental inquiry, the first chapter centers on the convergence of oppressive measures and treatment perpetrated against Roma and Jews through the 1930s and into the early years of the war. These parallel experiences of violence and injustice include mass shootings committed by <em>Einsatzgruppen</em>, special killing squads, deportation to labor camps, and confinement in ghettos. Joskowicz effectively demonstrates both the intersections and diverse nature of experiences faced by Sinti and Roma during this time. He cites a long pattern of anti-Romani policing that contributed to a lack of attention devoted to the imprisonment and policies against Romani people in postwar historiography. Conversely, the violence against Jews signaled a distinct shift in treatment that dominated the focus of postwar Holocaust studies. Despite this reference to the widespread existence of anti-Romani policing in Europe, no further examples or context of pre-1930 anti-Roma policies or initiatives are provided in the text or in the footnotes. Including these could have provided readers important context and justification for the more \"accepted\" marginalization of Roma leading up to 1939.</p> <p>Chronologically and thematically organized, the chapters in <em>Rain of Ash</em> <strong>[End Page 126]</strong> each focus on aspects that influenced postwar historiography and recognition (or lack thereof) of the Jewish and Roma genocide. Joskowicz provides an in-depth examination of several organizations, individuals, and court proceedings throughout the book's chapters, in which he investigates the way both larger institutions and particular individuals contributed to the dispensation of justice, such as the construction of memorials and monetary or material reparations. Joskowicz includes an impressive breadth of sources—discussing examples from France, Austria, Great Britain, and Germany, among others—to illustrate the way that Roma traditionally turned to Jewish organizations to demand their respective rights and equity: \"Jews' experiences during the war were still better known, and documenting them tended to accrue certain legal rights…. Proving suffering in the same places as Jews, or in similar ways, was often Romanies' best bet at receiving recognition and compensation of their own after the war\" (64).</p> <p>Holocaust Studies is dominated by scholarship centered on experiences of Jewish victims, but the discipline nonetheless underwent a change in the late twentieth century, as scholars such as Ian Hancock, David Crowe, and Anton Weiss-Wendt brought awareness to the Roma genocide. Joskowicz critically adds to the discipline of Holocaust Studies by offering a fresh perspective: whereas texts by the aforementioned authors largely focus on understanding the Nazis' persecution of Roma based on racial grounds, Joskowicz interrogates the role of institutions and systems that dictated postwar historiography and the (greater) recognition of the Jewish and (lesser) awareness of the Roma genocide.</p> <p><em>Rain of Ash</em> would be especially suited for scholars of the Second World War and the Holocaust, as well as those studying judicial practices related to human rights abuses. Furthermore, through its inclusion of a variety of sources and the structural...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":40350,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Austrian Studies","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Austrian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/oas.2023.a914888","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:

  • Rain of Ash: Roma, Jews, and the Holocaust by Ari Joskowicz
  • Natasza Gawlick
Ari Joskowicz, Rain of Ash: Roma, Jews, and the Holocaust. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP, 2023. 351 pp.

In his incisive monograph, Rain of Ash: Roma, Jews, and the Holocaust, published by Princeton UP in 2023, Ari Joskowicz explores the related experiences of Jews and Roma within the context of the Holocaust, with a particular focus on institutions that play a role in justice, representation, and advocacy. Over the course of six chapters (not including the introduction), Joskowicz traces the simultaneously distinct and intertwined fates of Roma and Jews before, during, and after the Holocaust. As the author states in his preface, this is not a book on memory, nor a book based on his Jewish ancestors' legacy (xi). Rather, Joskowicz is sensitive to issues of self-representation and the differing levels of recognition given to various victim groups by investigating the following questions: How do we know about the suffering of others? What role do institutions (and individuals), political entities, financial means, and testimonies play in the production of knowledge, history, and memory?

Joskowicz approaches these questions by discussing specific examples of Roma-Jewish relations, interactions, or observations in each of his chapters. Following the introduction, which naturally lays out the text's purpose and fundamental inquiry, the first chapter centers on the convergence of oppressive measures and treatment perpetrated against Roma and Jews through the 1930s and into the early years of the war. These parallel experiences of violence and injustice include mass shootings committed by Einsatzgruppen, special killing squads, deportation to labor camps, and confinement in ghettos. Joskowicz effectively demonstrates both the intersections and diverse nature of experiences faced by Sinti and Roma during this time. He cites a long pattern of anti-Romani policing that contributed to a lack of attention devoted to the imprisonment and policies against Romani people in postwar historiography. Conversely, the violence against Jews signaled a distinct shift in treatment that dominated the focus of postwar Holocaust studies. Despite this reference to the widespread existence of anti-Romani policing in Europe, no further examples or context of pre-1930 anti-Roma policies or initiatives are provided in the text or in the footnotes. Including these could have provided readers important context and justification for the more "accepted" marginalization of Roma leading up to 1939.

Chronologically and thematically organized, the chapters in Rain of Ash [End Page 126] each focus on aspects that influenced postwar historiography and recognition (or lack thereof) of the Jewish and Roma genocide. Joskowicz provides an in-depth examination of several organizations, individuals, and court proceedings throughout the book's chapters, in which he investigates the way both larger institutions and particular individuals contributed to the dispensation of justice, such as the construction of memorials and monetary or material reparations. Joskowicz includes an impressive breadth of sources—discussing examples from France, Austria, Great Britain, and Germany, among others—to illustrate the way that Roma traditionally turned to Jewish organizations to demand their respective rights and equity: "Jews' experiences during the war were still better known, and documenting them tended to accrue certain legal rights…. Proving suffering in the same places as Jews, or in similar ways, was often Romanies' best bet at receiving recognition and compensation of their own after the war" (64).

Holocaust Studies is dominated by scholarship centered on experiences of Jewish victims, but the discipline nonetheless underwent a change in the late twentieth century, as scholars such as Ian Hancock, David Crowe, and Anton Weiss-Wendt brought awareness to the Roma genocide. Joskowicz critically adds to the discipline of Holocaust Studies by offering a fresh perspective: whereas texts by the aforementioned authors largely focus on understanding the Nazis' persecution of Roma based on racial grounds, Joskowicz interrogates the role of institutions and systems that dictated postwar historiography and the (greater) recognition of the Jewish and (lesser) awareness of the Roma genocide.

Rain of Ash would be especially suited for scholars of the Second World War and the Holocaust, as well as those studying judicial practices related to human rights abuses. Furthermore, through its inclusion of a variety of sources and the structural...

灰烬之雨:罗姆人、犹太人和大屠杀》,作者 Ari Joskowicz(评论)
以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要:评论者: 灰烬之雨:阿里-约斯科维奇(Ari Joskowicz)著,《灰雨:罗姆人、犹太人和大屠杀》(Rain of Ash: Roma, Jews, and the Holocaust by Ari Joskowicz Natasza Gawlick Ari Joskowicz):罗姆人、犹太人和大屠杀》。新泽西州普林斯顿:普林斯顿大学出版社,2023 年。351 页。在其精辟的专著《灰烬之雨》中:Ari Joskowicz 在普林斯顿大学出版社 2023 年出版的精辟专著《灰烬之雨:罗姆人、犹太人和大屠杀》中,探讨了犹太人和罗姆人在大屠杀背景下的相关经历,尤其关注在正义、代表性和倡导方面发挥作用的机构。在六个章节(不包括引言)中,约斯考维奇追溯了罗姆人和犹太人在大屠杀之前、期间和之后既截然不同又相互交织的命运。正如作者在序言中所说,这不是一本关于记忆的书,也不是一本基于其犹太祖先遗产的书(xi)。相反,Joskowicz 通过对以下问题的研究,对自我表述问题以及不同受害群体所获得的不同程度的认可保持了敏感:我们如何了解他人的苦难?机构(和个人)、政治实体、经济手段和证词在知识、历史和记忆的生产中扮演着怎样的角色?Joskowicz 通过在各章中讨论罗姆人与犹太人关系、互动或观察的具体实例来探讨这些问题。导言自然而然地阐述了该书的目的和基本探究内容,第一章的中心内容是 20 世纪 30 年代至战争初期,针对罗姆人和犹太人的压迫措施和待遇的融合。这些平行的暴力和不公正经历包括 Einsatzgruppen 的大规模枪杀、特别杀人小队、被驱逐到劳改营以及被关押在贫民区。Joskowicz 有效地展示了辛提人和罗姆人在这一时期所面临经历的交叉性和多样性。他列举了长期以来反罗姆人的治安模式,这种模式导致战后史学界对罗姆人的监禁和政策缺乏关注。与此相反,针对犹太人的暴力事件标志着战后大屠杀研究的重点在对待犹太人的方式上发生了明显的转变。尽管该书提到了欧洲广泛存在的反罗姆人警务,但正文或脚注中并未提供更多 1930 年前反罗姆人政策或举措的实例或背景。如果将这些内容包括在内,本可为读者提供重要的背景资料,并为 1939 年前罗姆人被边缘化提供更多 "公认 "的理由。灰烬之雨》[第126页完] 的各章按时间和主题编排,分别侧重于影响战后历史学以及对犹太人和罗姆人种族灭绝的认识(或缺乏认识)的各个方面。Joskowicz 在全书各章中对一些组织、个人和法庭诉讼进行了深入研究,他在研究中探讨了大型机构和特定个人如何为伸张正义做出贡献,如建造纪念馆和进行金钱或物质赔偿。Joskowicz 收录了大量资料--讨论了法国、奥地利、英国和德国等国的例子--以说明罗姆人传统上是如何求助于犹太人组织来要求各自的权利和公平的:"犹太人在战争期间的经历还是比较为人所知的,记录这些经历往往能获得某些法律权利....。证明在与犹太人相同的地方或以类似的方式遭受苦难,往往是罗姆人在战后获得承认和补偿的最佳选择"(64)。大屠杀研究以犹太人受害者的经历为中心,但随着伊恩-汉考克(Ian Hancock)、大卫-克劳(David Crowe)和安东-魏斯-温特(Anton Weiss-Wendt)等学者对罗姆人种族灭绝问题的关注,这一学科在 20 世纪末发生了变化。Joskowicz 提供了一个全新的视角,为大屠杀研究学科增添了批判性的内容:上述作者的文章主要侧重于理解纳粹基于种族原因对罗姆人的迫害,而 Joskowicz 则审视了主导战后历史学的机构和体系的作用,以及对犹太人的(更多)承认和对罗姆人种族灭绝的(较少)认识。灰烬之雨》尤其适合研究第二次世界大战和大屠杀的学者,以及研究与侵犯人权相关的司法实践的学者。此外,《灰烬之雨》通过纳入各种资料来源和结构化的语言,使读者能够更好地理解该书。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Austrian Studies
Journal of Austrian Studies HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: The Journal of Austrian Studies is an interdisciplinary quarterly that publishes scholarly articles and book reviews on all aspects of the history and culture of Austria, Austro-Hungary, and the Habsburg territory. It is the flagship publication of the Austrian Studies Association and contains contributions in German and English from the world''s premiere scholars in the field of Austrian studies. The journal highlights scholarly work that draws on innovative methodologies and new ways of viewing Austrian history and culture. Although the journal was renamed in 2012 to reflect the increasing scope and diversity of its scholarship, it has a long lineage dating back over a half century as Modern Austrian Literature and, prior to that, The Journal of the International Arthur Schnitzler Research Association.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信