OP104 Pilot Implementation Of Health Technology Assessment Topic Prioritization In The Philippines: Lessons And Plans For Moving Forward

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Sheena Jasley Samonte, Lara Alyssa Liban, Princess Allyza Mondala, Jason Oliver Angeles, Russell Cabus, Patrick Wincy Reyes, Anne Julienne Marfori, Anna Melissa Guerrero, Health Technology Assessment Council
{"title":"OP104 Pilot Implementation Of Health Technology Assessment Topic Prioritization In The Philippines: Lessons And Plans For Moving Forward","authors":"Sheena Jasley Samonte, Lara Alyssa Liban, Princess Allyza Mondala, Jason Oliver Angeles, Russell Cabus, Patrick Wincy Reyes, Anne Julienne Marfori, Anna Melissa Guerrero, Health Technology Assessment Council","doi":"10.1017/s0266462323001174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span>Introduction</span><p>The Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Council in the Philippines carried out its process tracks while the implementing guidelines were being finalized in 2020, due to the urgent need to respond to COVID-19. Two years later, as mandated by the Universal Healthcare (UHC) law, we opened the nominations for the HTA Council’s topic priority list, which will be assessed to inform government financing decisions.</p><span>Methods</span><p>We adopted the former Philippine National Formulary System (PNFS) but set the prioritization criteria according to the decision framework stipulated by the UHC law and allowed industry submissions. We streamlined dossier completion for topics with numerous proponents, supplemented dossier deficiencies, and adjusted the timelines of crucial steps for better reach, while accounting for possible setbacks during the time periods. We satisfied the prioritization criteria using a Delphi technique at the HTA Council subcommittee and Core Committee levels in conjunction with consultations with the Department of Health and the national payer. We also shared evidence base and topic prioritization criteria scores with stakeholders during the public consultation.</p><span>Results</span><p>In the pilot implementation, we processed a total of 140 nominations (88 complete submissions) and released the priority list in five months. After processing 31 appeals from all key stakeholder groups, the 2022 priority list covered 31 assessments based on topics from the Department of Health, the national payer, industry, hospitals, and medical societies. Although we found gaps in the set timelines, inadequacy in the prioritization criteria parameters, and the need to increase exposure of the public to the process, we were able to accommodate all stakeholder concerns and maintain flexibility in the process.</p><span>Conclusions</span><p>We need to update our HTA process guidelines, accept joint dossier submissions, and review our topic prioritization process. The changing health system landscape and transitioning of national health priorities require coordination with the Philippine Food and Drug Administration for horizon scanning, early HTA, and managed entry agreements. Finally, there is a need to create special pathways for rare disease and innovative technologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462323001174","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Council in the Philippines carried out its process tracks while the implementing guidelines were being finalized in 2020, due to the urgent need to respond to COVID-19. Two years later, as mandated by the Universal Healthcare (UHC) law, we opened the nominations for the HTA Council’s topic priority list, which will be assessed to inform government financing decisions.

Methods

We adopted the former Philippine National Formulary System (PNFS) but set the prioritization criteria according to the decision framework stipulated by the UHC law and allowed industry submissions. We streamlined dossier completion for topics with numerous proponents, supplemented dossier deficiencies, and adjusted the timelines of crucial steps for better reach, while accounting for possible setbacks during the time periods. We satisfied the prioritization criteria using a Delphi technique at the HTA Council subcommittee and Core Committee levels in conjunction with consultations with the Department of Health and the national payer. We also shared evidence base and topic prioritization criteria scores with stakeholders during the public consultation.

Results

In the pilot implementation, we processed a total of 140 nominations (88 complete submissions) and released the priority list in five months. After processing 31 appeals from all key stakeholder groups, the 2022 priority list covered 31 assessments based on topics from the Department of Health, the national payer, industry, hospitals, and medical societies. Although we found gaps in the set timelines, inadequacy in the prioritization criteria parameters, and the need to increase exposure of the public to the process, we were able to accommodate all stakeholder concerns and maintain flexibility in the process.

Conclusions

We need to update our HTA process guidelines, accept joint dossier submissions, and review our topic prioritization process. The changing health system landscape and transitioning of national health priorities require coordination with the Philippine Food and Drug Administration for horizon scanning, early HTA, and managed entry agreements. Finally, there is a need to create special pathways for rare disease and innovative technologies.

OP104 菲律宾卫生技术评估主题优先次序的试点实施:经验教训与前进计划
导言由于急需应对 COVID-19,菲律宾卫生技术评估(HTA)委员会在 2020 年实施指南定稿时开展了流程跟踪。两年后,根据《全民医疗保健法》(UHC)的规定,我们开放了 HTA 委员会主题优先列表的提名,该列表将通过评估为政府融资决策提供信息。我们简化了有众多支持者的课题的档案填写,补充了档案中的不足之处,并调整了关键步骤的时间安排,以便更好地达成目标,同时考虑到在此期间可能出现的挫折。我们在 HTA 理事会小组委员会和核心委员会层面采用德尔菲技术,并与卫生部和国家支付方协商,以满足优先排序标准。在试点实施过程中,我们共处理了 140 项提名(88 项完整提交),并在五个月内发布了优先列表。在处理了来自所有主要利益相关者团体的 31 项申诉后,2022 年优先列表涵盖了 31 项评估,这些评估基于卫生部、国家支付方、行业、医院和医学会的主题。尽管我们发现了既定时间表中的漏洞、优先级标准参数中的不足,以及需要增加公众对该流程的了解,但我们还是能够照顾到所有利益相关者的关切,并保持了流程的灵活性。不断变化的卫生系统格局和国家卫生优先事项的转变需要与菲律宾食品药品管理局协调,以进行前景扫描、早期 HTA 和管理性进入协议。最后,有必要为罕见疾病和创新技术创建特殊途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信