Robust option pricing with volatility term structure -- An empirical study for variance options

Alexander M. G. Cox, Annemarie M. Grass
{"title":"Robust option pricing with volatility term structure -- An empirical study for variance options","authors":"Alexander M. G. Cox, Annemarie M. Grass","doi":"arxiv-2312.09201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The robust option pricing problem is to find upper and lower bounds on fair\nprices of financial claims using only the most minimal assumptions. It\ncontrasts with the classical, model-based approach and gained prominence in the\nwake of the 2008 financial crisis, and can be used to understand the extent to\nwhich a model-based price is sensitive to the underlying model assumptions.\nCommon approaches involve pricing exotic derivatives such as variance options\nby incorporating market data through implied volatility. The existing\nliterature focuses largely on incorporating implied volatility information\ncorresponding to the maturity of the exotic option. In this paper, we aim to\nexplain how intermediate data can and should be incorporated. It is natural to\nexpect that this additional information will improve the robust pricing bounds.\nTo investigate this question, we consider variance options, where the bounds of\nthe informed robust pricing problem are known. We proceed to conduct an\nempirical study uncovering a surprising finding: Contrary to common belief, the\nincorporation of more information does not lead to an improvement of the robust\npricing bounds.","PeriodicalId":501355,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - QuantFin - Pricing of Securities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - QuantFin - Pricing of Securities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2312.09201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The robust option pricing problem is to find upper and lower bounds on fair prices of financial claims using only the most minimal assumptions. It contrasts with the classical, model-based approach and gained prominence in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, and can be used to understand the extent to which a model-based price is sensitive to the underlying model assumptions. Common approaches involve pricing exotic derivatives such as variance options by incorporating market data through implied volatility. The existing literature focuses largely on incorporating implied volatility information corresponding to the maturity of the exotic option. In this paper, we aim to explain how intermediate data can and should be incorporated. It is natural to expect that this additional information will improve the robust pricing bounds. To investigate this question, we consider variance options, where the bounds of the informed robust pricing problem are known. We proceed to conduct an empirical study uncovering a surprising finding: Contrary to common belief, the incorporation of more information does not lead to an improvement of the robust pricing bounds.
带波动率期限结构的稳健期权定价--方差期权的实证研究
稳健期权定价问题是指只使用最基本的假设,找到金融债权公允价格的上下限。它与经典的、基于模型的方法形成对比,在 2008 年金融危机的冲击下获得了突出的地位,并可用于了解基于模型的价格对基本模型假设的敏感程度。常见的方法包括通过隐含波动率纳入市场数据来为方差期权等特殊衍生品定价。现有的文献主要集中在纳入与特殊期权到期日相对应的隐含波动率信息。在本文中,我们旨在解释如何以及应该如何纳入中间数据。为了研究这个问题,我们考虑了方差期权,因为已知的知情稳健定价问题的边界。我们继续进行实证研究,发现了一个令人惊讶的发现:与普遍的看法相反,纳入更多的信息并不会导致稳健定价边界的改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信