Consecutive Transcutaneous and Epidural Spinal Cord Neuromodulation to Modify Clinical Complete Paralysis—the Proof of Concept

Elvira Mukhametova MD , Alena Militskova MS , Artur Biktimirov MD , Nikita Kharin MS , Elena Semenova MS , Oskar Sachenkov PhD , Tatiana Baltina PhD , Igor Lavrov MD, PhD
{"title":"Consecutive Transcutaneous and Epidural Spinal Cord Neuromodulation to Modify Clinical Complete Paralysis—the Proof of Concept","authors":"Elvira Mukhametova MD ,&nbsp;Alena Militskova MS ,&nbsp;Artur Biktimirov MD ,&nbsp;Nikita Kharin MS ,&nbsp;Elena Semenova MS ,&nbsp;Oskar Sachenkov PhD ,&nbsp;Tatiana Baltina PhD ,&nbsp;Igor Lavrov MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2023.09.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate the effect of transcutaneous (tSCS) and epidural electrical spinal cord stimulation (EES) in facilitating volitional movements, balance, and nonmotor functions, in this observational study, tSCS and EES were consecutively tested in 2 participants with motor complete spinal cord injury (SCI).</p></div><div><h3>Participants and Methods</h3><p>Two participants (a 48-year-old woman and a 28-year-old man), both classified as motor complete spinal injury, were enrolled in the study. Both participants went through a unified protocol, such as an initial electrophysiological assessment of neural connectivity, consecutive tSCS and EES combined with 8 wks of motor training with electromyography (EMG) and kinematic evaluation. The study was conducted from May 1, 2019, to December 31, 2021.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In both participants, tSCS reported a minimal improvement in voluntary movements still essential to start tSCS-enabled rehabilitation. Compared with tSCS, following EES showed immediate improvement in voluntary movements, whereas tSCS was more effective in improving balance and posture. Continuous improvement in nonmotor functions was found during tSCS-enabled and then during EES-enabled motor training.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Results report a significant difference in the effect of tSCS and EES on the recovery of neurologic functions and support consecutive tSCS and EES applications as a potential therapy for SCI. The proposed approach may help in selecting patients with SCI responsive to neuromodulation. It would also help initiate neuromodulation and rehabilitation therapy early, particularly for motor complete SCI with minimal effect from conventional rehabilitation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94132,"journal":{"name":"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542454823000644/pdfft?md5=c15d5171a92a6d907c575eb820ff6c71&pid=1-s2.0-S2542454823000644-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542454823000644","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the effect of transcutaneous (tSCS) and epidural electrical spinal cord stimulation (EES) in facilitating volitional movements, balance, and nonmotor functions, in this observational study, tSCS and EES were consecutively tested in 2 participants with motor complete spinal cord injury (SCI).

Participants and Methods

Two participants (a 48-year-old woman and a 28-year-old man), both classified as motor complete spinal injury, were enrolled in the study. Both participants went through a unified protocol, such as an initial electrophysiological assessment of neural connectivity, consecutive tSCS and EES combined with 8 wks of motor training with electromyography (EMG) and kinematic evaluation. The study was conducted from May 1, 2019, to December 31, 2021.

Results

In both participants, tSCS reported a minimal improvement in voluntary movements still essential to start tSCS-enabled rehabilitation. Compared with tSCS, following EES showed immediate improvement in voluntary movements, whereas tSCS was more effective in improving balance and posture. Continuous improvement in nonmotor functions was found during tSCS-enabled and then during EES-enabled motor training.

Conclusion

Results report a significant difference in the effect of tSCS and EES on the recovery of neurologic functions and support consecutive tSCS and EES applications as a potential therapy for SCI. The proposed approach may help in selecting patients with SCI responsive to neuromodulation. It would also help initiate neuromodulation and rehabilitation therapy early, particularly for motor complete SCI with minimal effect from conventional rehabilitation.

连续经皮和硬膜外脊髓神经调控改变临床完全瘫痪--概念验证
目的观察经皮脊髓电刺激(tSCS)和硬膜外脊髓电刺激(EES)在促进意志运动、平衡和非运动功能方面的作用,对2例运动性完全性脊髓损伤(SCI)患者连续进行tSCS和EES测试。参与者和方法两名参与者(一名48岁的女性和一名28岁的男性)均被归类为运动性完全性脊髓损伤。两名参与者都通过了统一的方案,如神经连通性的初始电生理评估,连续的tSCS和EES结合8周的运动训练与肌电图(EMG)和运动学评估。该研究于2019年5月1日至2021年12月31日进行。结果在两名参与者中,tSCS报告了自愿运动的微小改善,这仍然是开始tSCS支持的康复所必需的。与tSCS相比,EES在自主运动方面立即得到改善,而tSCS在改善平衡和姿势方面更有效。非运动功能的持续改善在激活tscs和激活ees的运动训练期间被发现。结论tSCS和EES对神经功能恢复的影响有显著差异,并支持连续应用tSCS和EES作为脊髓损伤的潜在治疗方法。该方法可能有助于选择对神经调节有反应的脊髓损伤患者。它也有助于早期启动神经调节和康复治疗,特别是对运动完全性脊髓损伤,传统康复治疗效果最小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes
Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes Surgery, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Public Health and Health Policy
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
49 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信