Participant-oriented evaluation through participatory action research: a case study of a community engagement approach

IF 0.7 Q4 BUSINESS
Szilvia Nagy
{"title":"Participant-oriented evaluation through participatory action research: a case study of a community engagement approach","authors":"Szilvia Nagy","doi":"10.1108/aam-08-2021-0041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis article explores the applicability of participatory action research (PAR) on two levels: on the one hand, as a participatory evaluation method for community engagement and community development; on the other hand, as a tool to link ex ante and ex-post evaluation that situated at various stages of the policy cycle.Design/methodology/approachThrough a practice-based case study of the community engagement process of Valletta Design Cluster, this paper aims to illustrate how PAR can offer collaborative and continuous evaluation by facilitating social action through a practical, situative, context-bounded, responsive and transformative framework.FindingsThe study explores how PAR can contribute to cultural sustainability by linking community development with participatory evaluation, and it offers new perspectives on the applicability of PAR as a tool to link ex ante and ex-post evaluation, situated at various stages of the policy cycle.Research limitations/implicationsAlthough based on a single case, the paper demonstrates that the method has the potential to be applied in various contexts, as it helps to foster local ownership and to develop future cultural strategies, thus providing a base for cultural sustainability.Originality/valueThe novelty of this study is to link evaluation – a majorly top-down and ex ante approach – with participatory planning. PAR-E offers a continuous participatory framework for the whole European Capitals of Culture (ECoC) cycle, as well as serving as a tool for empowerment and community development.","PeriodicalId":42080,"journal":{"name":"Arts and the Market","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arts and the Market","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/aam-08-2021-0041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThis article explores the applicability of participatory action research (PAR) on two levels: on the one hand, as a participatory evaluation method for community engagement and community development; on the other hand, as a tool to link ex ante and ex-post evaluation that situated at various stages of the policy cycle.Design/methodology/approachThrough a practice-based case study of the community engagement process of Valletta Design Cluster, this paper aims to illustrate how PAR can offer collaborative and continuous evaluation by facilitating social action through a practical, situative, context-bounded, responsive and transformative framework.FindingsThe study explores how PAR can contribute to cultural sustainability by linking community development with participatory evaluation, and it offers new perspectives on the applicability of PAR as a tool to link ex ante and ex-post evaluation, situated at various stages of the policy cycle.Research limitations/implicationsAlthough based on a single case, the paper demonstrates that the method has the potential to be applied in various contexts, as it helps to foster local ownership and to develop future cultural strategies, thus providing a base for cultural sustainability.Originality/valueThe novelty of this study is to link evaluation – a majorly top-down and ex ante approach – with participatory planning. PAR-E offers a continuous participatory framework for the whole European Capitals of Culture (ECoC) cycle, as well as serving as a tool for empowerment and community development.
通过参与式行动研究进行以参与方为导向的评估:社区参与方法案例研究
目的本文从两个层面探讨参与式行动研究的适用性:一方面,作为社区参与和社区发展的参与式评价方法;另一方面,作为一种将处于政策周期不同阶段的事前和事后评价联系起来的工具。设计/方法/方法通过对瓦莱塔设计集群社区参与过程的实践案例研究,本文旨在说明PAR如何通过一个实用的、情境的、情境约束的、响应性的和变革性的框架来促进社会行动,从而提供协作和持续的评估。研究结果本研究探讨了PAR如何通过将社区发展与参与性评估联系起来来促进文化可持续性,并为PAR作为一种工具的适用性提供了新的视角,该工具将位于政策周期的各个阶段的事前和事后评估联系起来。研究局限/启示虽然基于单一案例,但本文表明该方法具有应用于各种情况的潜力,因为它有助于培养地方所有权和制定未来的文化战略,从而为文化可持续性提供基础。独创性/价值本研究的新颖之处在于将评估(主要是自上而下和事前的方法)与参与性规划联系起来。PAR-E为整个欧洲文化之都(ECoC)周期提供了一个持续的参与性框架,并作为赋权和社区发展的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
28.60%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信