PP64 Cost-Effectiveness Of Fractional Flow Reserve As Diagnostic Tool In Coronary Artery Disease Versus Angiogram Alone In Indian context

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Monika Pusha, Arif Fahim, Kirti Kataria
{"title":"PP64 Cost-Effectiveness Of Fractional Flow Reserve As Diagnostic Tool In Coronary Artery Disease Versus Angiogram Alone In Indian context","authors":"Monika Pusha, Arif Fahim, Kirti Kataria","doi":"10.1017/s0266462323002015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span>Introduction</span><p>Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) is a diagnostic tool that aids decision-making in the treatment of coronary artery disease (CAD). FFR provides an objective measurement and is used as an adjunct to an angiogram. The clinical and cost-benefit of using FFR have been well established across published literature. This research was aimed at evaluating the economic impact of using FFR as an adjunct to angiogram versus an angiogram alone, in the Indian healthcare context.</p><span>Methods</span><p>A study from a tertiary care public hospital in India estimated the impact of using FFR as an adjunct to angiogram in management of CAD. This study was used to create a mathematical simulation model to estimate cost-effectiveness and economic impact of using FFR over seven years’ time horizon, from the Indian health systems perspective. A targeted literature review was performed to collect the clinical inputs for the model, and the national public health insurance program data was referenced to obtain the cost inputs.</p><span>Results</span><p>A hypothetical cohort of 100,000 patients in the model reported 30 percent reduction in unnecessary stenting. Moreover, 14,025 deaths were averted with the adoption of FFR. In addition, there was a cost-saving of INR46,986 (574USD) per death averted and INR5,169 (63USD) per patient treated over a seven-year time horizon. The analysis demonstrated that FFR inclusion in the current clinical practice saves INR2,651 (32USD) per patient in overall upfront cost and INR2,518 (31USD) per patient in overall follow-up cost over a seven year follow-up period owing to improved diagnosis and prognosis.</p><span>Conclusions</span><p>In conclusion, FFR prevents unnecessary stenting, reduces overall mortality, and proves to be a cost-saving intervention in the long-term when used as a decision-making criterion in CAD patients in the Indian context.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462323002015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) is a diagnostic tool that aids decision-making in the treatment of coronary artery disease (CAD). FFR provides an objective measurement and is used as an adjunct to an angiogram. The clinical and cost-benefit of using FFR have been well established across published literature. This research was aimed at evaluating the economic impact of using FFR as an adjunct to angiogram versus an angiogram alone, in the Indian healthcare context.

Methods

A study from a tertiary care public hospital in India estimated the impact of using FFR as an adjunct to angiogram in management of CAD. This study was used to create a mathematical simulation model to estimate cost-effectiveness and economic impact of using FFR over seven years’ time horizon, from the Indian health systems perspective. A targeted literature review was performed to collect the clinical inputs for the model, and the national public health insurance program data was referenced to obtain the cost inputs.

Results

A hypothetical cohort of 100,000 patients in the model reported 30 percent reduction in unnecessary stenting. Moreover, 14,025 deaths were averted with the adoption of FFR. In addition, there was a cost-saving of INR46,986 (574USD) per death averted and INR5,169 (63USD) per patient treated over a seven-year time horizon. The analysis demonstrated that FFR inclusion in the current clinical practice saves INR2,651 (32USD) per patient in overall upfront cost and INR2,518 (31USD) per patient in overall follow-up cost over a seven year follow-up period owing to improved diagnosis and prognosis.

Conclusions

In conclusion, FFR prevents unnecessary stenting, reduces overall mortality, and proves to be a cost-saving intervention in the long-term when used as a decision-making criterion in CAD patients in the Indian context.

PP64 在印度,将分数血流储备作为冠状动脉疾病诊断工具与单纯血管造影相比的成本效益
分数血流储备(FFR)是一种辅助冠状动脉疾病(CAD)治疗决策的诊断工具。FFR提供了一个客观的测量,并被用作辅助血管造影。在已发表的文献中,使用FFR的临床和成本效益已经得到了很好的证实。本研究旨在评估在印度医疗保健背景下,使用FFR辅助血管造影与单独血管造影的经济影响。方法印度一家三级公立医院的一项研究评估了使用FFR作为血管造影辅助治疗CAD的影响。该研究用于创建一个数学模拟模型,以从印度卫生系统的角度估计使用FFR在7年时间范围内的成本效益和经济影响。通过有针对性的文献综述来收集模型的临床投入,并参考国家公共医疗保险计划数据来获得成本投入。结果:在该模型中,一个假设的10万名患者队列报告了不必要的支架置入减少了30%。此外,采用FFR避免了14 025人死亡。此外,在七年的时间范围内,每个避免死亡的病例节省了46,986印度卢比(574美元),每个治疗患者节省了5,169印度卢比(63美元)。分析表明,在目前的临床实践中,由于诊断和预后的改善,在7年的随访期间,纳入FFR可为每位患者节省2,651卢比(32美元)的总前期成本,为每位患者节省2,518卢比(31美元)的总随访成本。结论:FFR可以防止不必要的支架置入,降低总体死亡率,并证明FFR作为印度CAD患者的决策标准是一种长期节省成本的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信