PP97 How Health Technology Agencies Estimate Target Population Size For Medical Devices: The Example Of Spinal Cord Stimulation

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Apolline Ade, Natalie Hallas, Lydie Vancauwenberghe, Ilona Vogt-Humberg, Astrid Holm, Mette Lundsby, Benny Borgman, Beatriz Pellicer, Francesca Borghetti, Liesl Strachan
{"title":"PP97 How Health Technology Agencies Estimate Target Population Size For Medical Devices: The Example Of Spinal Cord Stimulation","authors":"Apolline Ade, Natalie Hallas, Lydie Vancauwenberghe, Ilona Vogt-Humberg, Astrid Holm, Mette Lundsby, Benny Borgman, Beatriz Pellicer, Francesca Borghetti, Liesl Strachan","doi":"10.1017/s0266462323002222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span>Introduction</span><p>Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an effective and safe option for patients with refractory neuropathic pain, with positive health technology assessment (HTA) recommendations across Western Europe, yet SCS uptake remains low. Estimating target patient populations within HTAs may impact upon medical device uptake, pricing and access. However, there is a dearth of information on how this is typically conducted. This study aimed to compare the approaches of Western Europe HTA agencies for estimating the target population for SCS.</p><span>Methods</span><p>A survey was conducted among members of the Health Economics and Reimbursement function from Western Europe to collect country-specific information on how HTA agencies assess the target population of medical devices (MD). The estimations of the target population for SCS were extracted from HTA publications and compared.</p><span>Results</span><p>Eight Health Economics and Reimbursement (HER) Analysts from France, Germany, the United Kingdom (UK), Belgium, Spain, Italy, Sweden and Norway completed the survey. HTA Agencies in France, UK and Belgium routinely ask for epidemiological data in the manufacturer submission, whereas in Germany, Sweden and Norway the request is dependent on the type of HTA submission. All HTA agencies, except NICE (UK), perform an independent estimation of the target population. HTA agencies in Germany and UK typically use epidemiological data from industry. In all countries, the estimation of the target population may indirectly impact the price of the MD, especially when budget impact analysis indicates a potential high use of healthcare resources. Only France, Belgium and UK have published HTA recommendations about SCS, however the estimated target population, nor the number of patients with refractory neuropathic pain, is not always included. Only the French and UK HTA agencies publish an approximation of the target population for SCS using the number of patients implanted every year.</p><span>Conclusions</span><p>This study showed there is a lack of harmonization between Western European HTA agencies’ guidelines on the inclusion and estimation of target patient populations. The new EU HTA Regulation should help to address this situation.</p>","PeriodicalId":14467,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462323002222","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an effective and safe option for patients with refractory neuropathic pain, with positive health technology assessment (HTA) recommendations across Western Europe, yet SCS uptake remains low. Estimating target patient populations within HTAs may impact upon medical device uptake, pricing and access. However, there is a dearth of information on how this is typically conducted. This study aimed to compare the approaches of Western Europe HTA agencies for estimating the target population for SCS.

Methods

A survey was conducted among members of the Health Economics and Reimbursement function from Western Europe to collect country-specific information on how HTA agencies assess the target population of medical devices (MD). The estimations of the target population for SCS were extracted from HTA publications and compared.

Results

Eight Health Economics and Reimbursement (HER) Analysts from France, Germany, the United Kingdom (UK), Belgium, Spain, Italy, Sweden and Norway completed the survey. HTA Agencies in France, UK and Belgium routinely ask for epidemiological data in the manufacturer submission, whereas in Germany, Sweden and Norway the request is dependent on the type of HTA submission. All HTA agencies, except NICE (UK), perform an independent estimation of the target population. HTA agencies in Germany and UK typically use epidemiological data from industry. In all countries, the estimation of the target population may indirectly impact the price of the MD, especially when budget impact analysis indicates a potential high use of healthcare resources. Only France, Belgium and UK have published HTA recommendations about SCS, however the estimated target population, nor the number of patients with refractory neuropathic pain, is not always included. Only the French and UK HTA agencies publish an approximation of the target population for SCS using the number of patients implanted every year.

Conclusions

This study showed there is a lack of harmonization between Western European HTA agencies’ guidelines on the inclusion and estimation of target patient populations. The new EU HTA Regulation should help to address this situation.

PP97 卫生技术机构如何估算医疗设备的目标人群规模?以脊髓刺激为例
脊髓刺激(SCS)是难治性神经性疼痛患者的一种有效且安全的选择,在西欧有积极的健康技术评估(HTA)建议,但SCS的摄取仍然很低。估计hta内的目标患者群体可能会影响医疗设备的使用、定价和获取。然而,缺乏关于这通常是如何进行的信息。本研究旨在比较西欧HTA机构估计SCS目标人群的方法。方法对来自西欧的卫生经济学和报销职能部门的成员进行调查,以收集有关HTA机构如何评估医疗器械(MD)目标人群的国家具体信息。从HTA出版物中提取SCS目标人群的估计值并进行比较。结果来自法国、德国、英国、比利时、西班牙、意大利、瑞典和挪威的8位卫生经济与报销(HER)分析师完成了调查。法国、英国和比利时的HTA机构通常要求制造商提交流行病学数据,而在德国、瑞典和挪威,要求取决于HTA提交的类型。除NICE (UK)外,所有HTA机构都对目标人群进行独立估计。德国和英国的HTA机构通常使用来自工业界的流行病学数据。在所有国家,对目标人群的估计都可能间接影响到MD的价格,特别是当预算影响分析表明医疗保健资源的潜在高使用量时。只有法国、比利时和英国发表了关于SCS的HTA建议,然而,估计的目标人群和难治性神经性疼痛患者的数量并不总是包括在内。只有法国和英国的HTA机构公布了使用每年植入患者数量的SCS目标人群的近似值。结论:本研究表明,在纳入和估计目标患者人群方面,西欧HTA机构的指南缺乏一致性。新的欧盟HTA条例应该有助于解决这一问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
15.60%
发文量
116
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care serves as a forum for the wide range of health policy makers and professionals interested in the economic, social, ethical, medical and public health implications of health technology. It covers the development, evaluation, diffusion and use of health technology, as well as its impact on the organization and management of health care systems and public health. In addition to general essays and research reports, regular columns on technology assessment reports and thematic sections are published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信