PP106 Integrating Organizational Impacts Into Health Technology Assessment: How To Take Them Into Account For Medical Devices?

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Estelle Piotto, Emmanuelle Fouteau, Camille Marguerite, Hubert Galmiche, Isabelle Adenot
{"title":"PP106 Integrating Organizational Impacts Into Health Technology Assessment: How To Take Them Into Account For Medical Devices?","authors":"Estelle Piotto, Emmanuelle Fouteau, Camille Marguerite, Hubert Galmiche, Isabelle Adenot","doi":"10.1017/s0266462323002301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span>Introduction</span><p>The organizational impact (OI) of new technologies is becoming a major driver for our healthcare systems and for modernizing the care pathway for the benefit of users and professionals. Some technologies give rise to a reorganization of the healthcare system, particularly in the case of connected medical devices.</p><p>The Medical Device Committee at Haute Autorité de Santé (HAS) appraises medical devices (MD) in view of their reimbursement by the French health insurance scheme. The Committee’s evaluation criteria take account of the therapeutic benefit of the MD and its public health benefit. OI-related aspects are frequently claimed by health technology developers (HTD) in their MD submission dossiers. However, this aspect is rarely documented. Therefore, guidance explaining how HTD should support and structure any claim of an OI was needed.</p><span>Methods</span><p>This work was based on the HAS OI Map for Health Technology Assessment published in 2020, the analyses of specific HAS opinions, hearings with concerned stakeholders (HTD, service providers and patients), and a committee meeting focused on OI.</p><span>Results</span><p>The HTD guide for MD submission was updated with guidance to support OI claims. For each claimed OI, the HTD should identify the criterion corresponding to the most relevant OI, the indicator to describe each selected criterion, the stakeholders concerned, and the data to be provided. The choice of method is according to the OI: if the indicator is measurable, data from validated measurement tools are expected. If not, especially in cases where the use of the MD requires a specific organization before its deployment, the absence of data must be justified and a detailed impact analysis is necessary. In this case, the development plan for the demonstration of the OI is needed.</p><span>Conclusions</span><p>With this updated guide for HTDs, claimed OI dimension shall be better supported in future MD dossiers submitted to HAS in view of their reimbursement in France.</p>","PeriodicalId":14467,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462323002301","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The organizational impact (OI) of new technologies is becoming a major driver for our healthcare systems and for modernizing the care pathway for the benefit of users and professionals. Some technologies give rise to a reorganization of the healthcare system, particularly in the case of connected medical devices.

The Medical Device Committee at Haute Autorité de Santé (HAS) appraises medical devices (MD) in view of their reimbursement by the French health insurance scheme. The Committee’s evaluation criteria take account of the therapeutic benefit of the MD and its public health benefit. OI-related aspects are frequently claimed by health technology developers (HTD) in their MD submission dossiers. However, this aspect is rarely documented. Therefore, guidance explaining how HTD should support and structure any claim of an OI was needed.

Methods

This work was based on the HAS OI Map for Health Technology Assessment published in 2020, the analyses of specific HAS opinions, hearings with concerned stakeholders (HTD, service providers and patients), and a committee meeting focused on OI.

Results

The HTD guide for MD submission was updated with guidance to support OI claims. For each claimed OI, the HTD should identify the criterion corresponding to the most relevant OI, the indicator to describe each selected criterion, the stakeholders concerned, and the data to be provided. The choice of method is according to the OI: if the indicator is measurable, data from validated measurement tools are expected. If not, especially in cases where the use of the MD requires a specific organization before its deployment, the absence of data must be justified and a detailed impact analysis is necessary. In this case, the development plan for the demonstration of the OI is needed.

Conclusions

With this updated guide for HTDs, claimed OI dimension shall be better supported in future MD dossiers submitted to HAS in view of their reimbursement in France.

PP106 将组织影响纳入健康技术评估:如何将组织影响纳入医疗技术评估?
新技术的组织影响(OI)正在成为我们的医疗保健系统和现代化护理途径的主要驱动力,以造福用户和专业人员。一些技术引起了医疗保健系统的重组,特别是在连接医疗设备的情况下。法国高等自治政府医疗器械委员会(HAS)根据法国医疗保险计划的报销情况对医疗器械(MD)进行评估。委员会的评估标准考虑到MD的治疗效益及其公共卫生效益。卫生技术开发人员(HTD)在其MD提交档案中经常声称与oi相关的方面。然而,这方面很少有文档记录。因此,解释HTD应该如何支持和构建任何OI声明的指南是必要的。方法本工作基于2020年发布的卫生技术评估HAS OI地图,对HAS具体意见的分析,与相关利益相关者(HTD,服务提供者和患者)的听证会,以及OI委员会会议。结果:HTD提交MD的指南更新了支持OI索赔的指南。对于每个声明的OI, HTD应该确定与最相关的OI相对应的标准、描述每个选定标准的指示器、相关的涉众以及要提供的数据。方法的选择是根据OI:如果指标是可测量的,则需要来自经过验证的测量工具的数据。如果没有,特别是在使用MD需要一个特定组织才能部署的情况下,必须证明缺乏数据是合理的,并有必要进行详细的影响分析。在这种情况下,需要OI演示的开发计划。结论:有了这个更新的HTDs指南,考虑到他们在法国的报销,在未来提交给HAS的MD档案中,声称的OI维度将得到更好的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
15.60%
发文量
116
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care serves as a forum for the wide range of health policy makers and professionals interested in the economic, social, ethical, medical and public health implications of health technology. It covers the development, evaluation, diffusion and use of health technology, as well as its impact on the organization and management of health care systems and public health. In addition to general essays and research reports, regular columns on technology assessment reports and thematic sections are published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信