Enlistment: Lists in Medieval and Early Modern Literature ed. by Eva Von Contzen and James Simpson (review)

IF 0.5 3区 社会学 0 LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES
Michael Van Dussen
{"title":"Enlistment: Lists in Medieval and Early Modern Literature ed. by Eva Von Contzen and James Simpson (review)","authors":"Michael Van Dussen","doi":"10.1353/art.2023.a915344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Enlistment: Lists in Medieval and Early Modern Literature</em> ed. by Eva Von Contzen and James Simpson <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Michael Van Dussen </li> </ul> <small>eva von contzen</small> and <small>james simpson</small>, eds., <em>Enlistment: Lists in Medieval and Early Modern Literature</em>. Columbus: The Ohio State University Press, 2022. Pp. 232. <small>isbn</small>: 978–0–8142–1522–7. $99.95. <p>Lists embedded in ancient, medieval, or early modern narratives are often regarded as the fly-over bits, artless filler, or unwelcome interruptions of narrative sequence. In other contexts—like indices or standalone groupings of disparate items—lists may be perused more for their practical function than for the logic of their arrangement or their hermeneutic possibilities. <em>Enlistment</em> takes up the practice of listing to regard lists as 'form[s] or way[s] of thinking' (p. 8). Lists can include or exclude; they can give the sense that a knowledge set is complete and circumscribed, or (on the contrary) limitless and expansive; they may suggest dispassionate transparency while at the same time obscuring the politics of the compiler's project. As the chapters in this volume show, scrutiny of enumerative or sequential patterns (which is how the term 'list' is regarded in its broadest sense in this collection) reveals how lists <em>en</em>list readers in the process of making sense of them.</p> <p>In the Introduction, the editors briefly survey prior scholarship on lists, with emphasis on medieval English literary contexts, and deploy theoretical models from other contexts to suggest how lists can be studied in terms of their 'affordances' and as <em>Denkformen</em> (forms or ways of thinking). The following chapters are then introduced according to how they participate in four conceptual (and not strictly binary) pairings: in/completeness, dis/ordering knowledge, un/familiarity, and boredom/play. <strong>[End Page 77]</strong></p> <p>Alexis Kellner Becker studies the extensive list of things a reeve should know in the Old English <em>Gerefa</em>, a guide for a reeve of an estate. <em>Gerefa</em>, 'a pre-Conquest text, imagining and preserving a pre-feudal reeve, redacted into and preserved in a post-Conquest legal manuscript' (p. 17), is self-consciously framed by an author who admits ignorance of the reeve's body of knowledge but who nevertheless presents it to his post-Conquest reader. Andrew James Johnston (Chapter Two) then discusses the presentation of the Old English <em>Widsith</em> as three consecutive lists of rulers and peoples. Johnston finds the concept of 'global modernism' to be a fruitful way to understand how the poet-narrator brings disparate temporalities, cultures, and 'antiquities' into conversation or even competition.</p> <p>In Chapter Three, Kathryn Mogk Wagner examines Christian lists of God's names as responses to the impossibility of naming the unnameable. Such lists could be rhythmic and incantatory, and the words themselves, coming from several languages and traditions, could be distorted beyond understanding. Their ancient and convoluted transmission also gave rise to variance and accretion, and the list form conveyed a fitting sense of inexhaustibility. Suzanne Conklin Akbari (Chapter Four) treats the Middle English <em>Benjamin Minor</em>, a contemplative text that uses a diagrammatic structure to allegorize the list of Jacob's children in Gen. 35:23-26. The result is an elaborate genealogical list as well as a contemplative treatise that 'organize[s] knowledge and […] facilitate[s] the process of the reader's intellectual and spiritual growth' (p. 77).</p> <p>Martha Rust turns to the history of listing the four rivers of Paradise (Chapter Five). In this highly associative study, the rivers may come to represent the virtues or serve as a heuristic for thinking about Christ's wounds. Epic catalogues in Middle English literature are next taken up by Eva von Contzen (Chapter Six). Her survey of lists of authorities on the Trojan War in Middle English poetry reveals a skepticism toward these authorities that appears to increase over time. In Chapter Seven, Wolfram R. Keller regards Gavin Douglas' <em>Palice of Honour</em> as a response to the disharmony of Chaucer's dream poetry, particularly in the <em>House of Fame</em>. Keller offers highly schematic readings of both <em>The House of Fame</em> and <em>Palice of Honour</em>, discussing both in terms of medieval cognitive theory and the management of courtly households. In constructing his <em>Palice</em>, Douglas enumerates a series of lists characterized by...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":43123,"journal":{"name":"Arthuriana","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthuriana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/art.2023.a915344","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:

  • Enlistment: Lists in Medieval and Early Modern Literature ed. by Eva Von Contzen and James Simpson
  • Michael Van Dussen
eva von contzen and james simpson, eds., Enlistment: Lists in Medieval and Early Modern Literature. Columbus: The Ohio State University Press, 2022. Pp. 232. isbn: 978–0–8142–1522–7. $99.95.

Lists embedded in ancient, medieval, or early modern narratives are often regarded as the fly-over bits, artless filler, or unwelcome interruptions of narrative sequence. In other contexts—like indices or standalone groupings of disparate items—lists may be perused more for their practical function than for the logic of their arrangement or their hermeneutic possibilities. Enlistment takes up the practice of listing to regard lists as 'form[s] or way[s] of thinking' (p. 8). Lists can include or exclude; they can give the sense that a knowledge set is complete and circumscribed, or (on the contrary) limitless and expansive; they may suggest dispassionate transparency while at the same time obscuring the politics of the compiler's project. As the chapters in this volume show, scrutiny of enumerative or sequential patterns (which is how the term 'list' is regarded in its broadest sense in this collection) reveals how lists enlist readers in the process of making sense of them.

In the Introduction, the editors briefly survey prior scholarship on lists, with emphasis on medieval English literary contexts, and deploy theoretical models from other contexts to suggest how lists can be studied in terms of their 'affordances' and as Denkformen (forms or ways of thinking). The following chapters are then introduced according to how they participate in four conceptual (and not strictly binary) pairings: in/completeness, dis/ordering knowledge, un/familiarity, and boredom/play. [End Page 77]

Alexis Kellner Becker studies the extensive list of things a reeve should know in the Old English Gerefa, a guide for a reeve of an estate. Gerefa, 'a pre-Conquest text, imagining and preserving a pre-feudal reeve, redacted into and preserved in a post-Conquest legal manuscript' (p. 17), is self-consciously framed by an author who admits ignorance of the reeve's body of knowledge but who nevertheless presents it to his post-Conquest reader. Andrew James Johnston (Chapter Two) then discusses the presentation of the Old English Widsith as three consecutive lists of rulers and peoples. Johnston finds the concept of 'global modernism' to be a fruitful way to understand how the poet-narrator brings disparate temporalities, cultures, and 'antiquities' into conversation or even competition.

In Chapter Three, Kathryn Mogk Wagner examines Christian lists of God's names as responses to the impossibility of naming the unnameable. Such lists could be rhythmic and incantatory, and the words themselves, coming from several languages and traditions, could be distorted beyond understanding. Their ancient and convoluted transmission also gave rise to variance and accretion, and the list form conveyed a fitting sense of inexhaustibility. Suzanne Conklin Akbari (Chapter Four) treats the Middle English Benjamin Minor, a contemplative text that uses a diagrammatic structure to allegorize the list of Jacob's children in Gen. 35:23-26. The result is an elaborate genealogical list as well as a contemplative treatise that 'organize[s] knowledge and […] facilitate[s] the process of the reader's intellectual and spiritual growth' (p. 77).

Martha Rust turns to the history of listing the four rivers of Paradise (Chapter Five). In this highly associative study, the rivers may come to represent the virtues or serve as a heuristic for thinking about Christ's wounds. Epic catalogues in Middle English literature are next taken up by Eva von Contzen (Chapter Six). Her survey of lists of authorities on the Trojan War in Middle English poetry reveals a skepticism toward these authorities that appears to increase over time. In Chapter Seven, Wolfram R. Keller regards Gavin Douglas' Palice of Honour as a response to the disharmony of Chaucer's dream poetry, particularly in the House of Fame. Keller offers highly schematic readings of both The House of Fame and Palice of Honour, discussing both in terms of medieval cognitive theory and the management of courtly households. In constructing his Palice, Douglas enumerates a series of lists characterized by...

入伍:Eva Von Contzen 和 James Simpson 编辑的《中世纪和早期现代文学中的名单》(评论)
代替摘要,这里是内容的简短摘录:审查:入伍:列表在中世纪和早期现代文学由伊娃·冯·孔岑和詹姆斯·辛普森迈克尔·范·杜森伊娃·冯·孔岑和詹姆斯·辛普森编辑。《入伍:中世纪和早期现代文学中的名单》。哥伦布:俄亥俄州立大学出版社,2022年。232页。isbn: 978-0-8142-1522-7。99.95美元。在古代、中世纪或早期现代的叙述中,列表通常被认为是过眼的片段、不做作的填充物或不受欢迎的叙述序列中断。在其他情况下——比如索引或不同项目的独立分组——阅读列表可能更多的是为了它们的实际功能,而不是它们排列的逻辑或解释的可能性。Enlistment采用了将列表视为“思维形式或方式”的做法(第8页)。列表可以包括或排除;它们可以给人一种知识集是完整和有限的感觉,或者(相反地)是无限和广阔的;它们可能建议不带感情的透明,同时模糊编译器项目的政治。正如本卷中的章节所示,对枚举或顺序模式(这就是本系列中“列表”一词在最广泛意义上的含义)的仔细研究揭示了列表如何在理解它们的过程中吸引读者。在引言中,编辑们简要地调查了之前关于列表的学术研究,重点是中世纪英语文学背景,并从其他背景中部署理论模型,以建议如何根据列表的“启示”和Denkformen(形式或思维方式)来研究列表。接下来的章节是根据它们如何参与四种概念(而不是严格的二元)配对来介绍的:in/completeness, disordered / ordered knowledge, un/熟悉,and bored /play。亚历克西斯·凯尔纳·贝克尔研究了古英语《Gerefa》(一份财产管理指南)中一个管家应该知道的大量事情。Gerefa,“一个被征服前的文本,想象并保存了一个前封建的法典,被编辑并保存在被征服后的法律手稿中”(第17页),是由一个承认对法典的知识体系一无所知的作者自觉地构建起来的,但他还是把它呈现给了被征服后的读者。安德鲁·詹姆斯·约翰斯顿(第二章)接着讨论了古英语Widsith作为三个连续的统治者和民族名单的呈现。约翰斯顿发现,“全球现代主义”的概念是理解诗人叙述者如何将不同的时间、文化和“古物”带入对话甚至竞争的一种富有成效的方式。在第三章中,凯瑟琳·莫克·瓦格纳(Kathryn mog Wagner)考察了基督徒列出的上帝的名字,作为对无法命名不可命名事物的回应。这样的清单可能是有节奏的和咒语的,而单词本身,来自几种语言和传统,可能被扭曲到无法理解。它们古老而复杂的传承也引起了变化和增加,列表形式传达了一种恰到好处的无穷无尽的感觉。Suzanne Conklin Akbari(第四章)研究了中世纪英语Benjamin Minor,这是一篇沉思的文章,用图解的结构来寓言创世纪35:23-26中雅各的孩子名单。结果是一份详尽的家谱表,以及一篇沉思的论文,“组织[s]知识,[…]促进[s]读者智力和精神成长的过程”(第77页)。玛莎·拉斯特转向列出天堂的四条河流的历史(第五章)。在这个高度关联的研究中,河流可以代表美德,也可以作为思考基督创伤的启发式。接下来,伊娃·冯·孔岑(Eva von Contzen)对中世纪英语文学中的史诗目录进行了探讨(第六章)。她对中世纪英语诗歌中有关特洛伊战争的权威名单的调查显示,人们对这些权威的怀疑似乎随着时间的推移而增加。在第七章中,Wolfram R. Keller认为加文·道格拉斯的《荣誉宫》是对乔叟的梦幻诗,尤其是《名望之屋》中不和谐的回应。凯勒对《名堂》和《荣誉警察》都提供了高度概括的解读,从中世纪认知理论和宫廷家庭管理的角度进行了讨论。在构建他的警察局时,道格拉斯列举了一系列的清单,其特点是……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arthuriana
Arthuriana Multiple-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Arthuriana publishes peer-reviewed, on-line analytical and bibliographical surveys of various Arthurian subjects. You can access these e-resources through this site. The review and evaluation processes for e-articles is identical to that for the print journal . Once accepted for publication, our surveys are supported and maintained by Professor Alan Lupack at the University of Rochester through the Camelot Project.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信