The effects of globalization on supply chain resilience: outsourcing techniques as interventionism, protectionism, and regionalization strategies

IF 6.9 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Yigit Kazancoglu, Cisem Lafci, Yalcin Berberoglu, Arvind Upadhyay, Luis Rocha-Lona, Vikas Kumar
{"title":"The effects of globalization on supply chain resilience: outsourcing techniques as interventionism, protectionism, and regionalization strategies","authors":"Yigit Kazancoglu, Cisem Lafci, Yalcin Berberoglu, Arvind Upadhyay, Luis Rocha-Lona, Vikas Kumar","doi":"10.1007/s12063-023-00429-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Globalization may cause companies to broaden their customer bases, operate internationally, and serve more customers. However, it also entails dangers, including shifting circumstances, disruptions, and elevated prices. To address these issues, outsourcing has evolved, lowering outputs and service costs. To mitigate these risks, businesses employ strategies such as interventionism, protectionism, and regionalization. By investigating and simulating the interplay of outsourcing approaches to equip businesses with supply chain resilience (SCRES), this study aims to close the knowledge gap between the existing knowledge and global supply chain (GSC) risk management practices. To choose the best alternative for our case study company, we analyzed four distinct outsourcing techniques, namely offshoring, reshoring, nearshoring, and farshoring; furthermore, we investigated the outsourcing elements typically taken into account to achieve resilience. The results indicated that the reshoring method would be the most promising one for this company, under specific circumstances, in terms of attaining resilience in the manufacturing industry.</p>","PeriodicalId":46120,"journal":{"name":"Operations Management Research","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operations Management Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-023-00429-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Globalization may cause companies to broaden their customer bases, operate internationally, and serve more customers. However, it also entails dangers, including shifting circumstances, disruptions, and elevated prices. To address these issues, outsourcing has evolved, lowering outputs and service costs. To mitigate these risks, businesses employ strategies such as interventionism, protectionism, and regionalization. By investigating and simulating the interplay of outsourcing approaches to equip businesses with supply chain resilience (SCRES), this study aims to close the knowledge gap between the existing knowledge and global supply chain (GSC) risk management practices. To choose the best alternative for our case study company, we analyzed four distinct outsourcing techniques, namely offshoring, reshoring, nearshoring, and farshoring; furthermore, we investigated the outsourcing elements typically taken into account to achieve resilience. The results indicated that the reshoring method would be the most promising one for this company, under specific circumstances, in terms of attaining resilience in the manufacturing industry.

Abstract Image

全球化对供应链复原力的影响:作为干预主义、保护主义和区域化战略的外包技术
全球化可能会使公司扩大其客户群,在国际上经营,并为更多的客户服务。然而,它也会带来危险,包括变化的环境、中断和价格上涨。为了解决这些问题,外包已经发展,降低了产出和服务成本。为了减轻这些风险,企业采用了干预主义、保护主义和区域化等策略。通过调查和模拟外包方法的相互作用,使企业具备供应链弹性(SCRES),本研究旨在缩小现有知识与全球供应链风险管理实践之间的知识差距。为了为我们的案例研究公司选择最佳替代方案,我们分析了四种不同的外包技术,即离岸外包、回流外包、近岸外包和远岸外包;此外,我们调查了通常考虑到实现弹性的外包元素。结果表明,在特定情况下,在实现制造业弹性方面,回流方法将是该公司最有希望的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
23.30%
发文量
104
期刊介绍: Operations Management Research is a peer-reviewed journal that focuses on rapidly publishing high-quality research in the field of operations management. It aims to advance both the theory and practice of operations management across a wide range of topics and research paradigms. The journal covers all aspects of operations management, including manufacturing, supply chain, health care, and service operations. It welcomes various research methodologies, such as case studies, action research, surveys, mathematical modeling, and simulation. The goal of Operations Management Research is to promote research that enhances both the theory and practice of operations management, as it is an applied discipline. The journal also publishes Academic Notes, which are special papers that address research methodologies, the direction of the operations management field, and other topics of interest to academicians. Additionally, there is a demand for shorter and more focused research articles in operations management, which this journal aims to fulfill.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信