Social services utilisation and referrals after seeking help from health services for self-harm: a systematic review and narrative synthesis

S. Steeg, Faraz Mughal, Nav Kapur, S. Gnani, Catherine Robinson
{"title":"Social services utilisation and referrals after seeking help from health services for self-harm: a systematic review and narrative synthesis","authors":"S. Steeg, Faraz Mughal, Nav Kapur, S. Gnani, Catherine Robinson","doi":"10.1136/bmjph-2023-000559","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Suicide prevention is a major public health challenge. Appropriate aftercare for self-harm is vital due to increased risks of suicide following self-harm. Many antecedents to self-harm involve social factors and there is strong rationale for social services-based self-harm aftercare. We aimed to review evidence for social service utilisation and referrals among people seeking help following self-harm.Systematic review with narrative synthesis.PubMed, PsycINFO, AMED, Social Policy and Practice, EMBASE, Medline, Web of Science, Social Care Online, citation lists of included articles and grey literature.Studies of people of any age in contact with health services following self-harm, with study outcomes including referrals to or utilisation of social workers and social services.Information was extracted from each included study using a proforma and quality was critically assessed by two reviewers. Narrative synthesis was used to review the evidence.From a total of 3414 studies retrieved, 10 reports of 7 studies were included. Study quality was generally high to moderate. All studies were based in emergency departments (EDs) and most were UK based. In studies based solely on ED data, low proportions were referred to social services (in most studies, 1%–4%, though it was up to 44% when social workers were involved in ED assessments). In one study using linked data, 15% (62/427) were referred to social services and 21% (466/2,205) attended social services over the subsequent 3-year period.Overall, few patients were referred to social services after self-harm. Higher reported referral rates may reflect greater service availability, involvement of social workers in psychosocial assessments or better capture of referral activity. Social services-based and integrated approaches for self-harm aftercare are important future directions for suicide prevention. Improved links between social services and health services for people seeking support after self-harm are recommended.","PeriodicalId":117861,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Public Health","volume":"344 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjph-2023-000559","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Suicide prevention is a major public health challenge. Appropriate aftercare for self-harm is vital due to increased risks of suicide following self-harm. Many antecedents to self-harm involve social factors and there is strong rationale for social services-based self-harm aftercare. We aimed to review evidence for social service utilisation and referrals among people seeking help following self-harm.Systematic review with narrative synthesis.PubMed, PsycINFO, AMED, Social Policy and Practice, EMBASE, Medline, Web of Science, Social Care Online, citation lists of included articles and grey literature.Studies of people of any age in contact with health services following self-harm, with study outcomes including referrals to or utilisation of social workers and social services.Information was extracted from each included study using a proforma and quality was critically assessed by two reviewers. Narrative synthesis was used to review the evidence.From a total of 3414 studies retrieved, 10 reports of 7 studies were included. Study quality was generally high to moderate. All studies were based in emergency departments (EDs) and most were UK based. In studies based solely on ED data, low proportions were referred to social services (in most studies, 1%–4%, though it was up to 44% when social workers were involved in ED assessments). In one study using linked data, 15% (62/427) were referred to social services and 21% (466/2,205) attended social services over the subsequent 3-year period.Overall, few patients were referred to social services after self-harm. Higher reported referral rates may reflect greater service availability, involvement of social workers in psychosocial assessments or better capture of referral activity. Social services-based and integrated approaches for self-harm aftercare are important future directions for suicide prevention. Improved links between social services and health services for people seeking support after self-harm are recommended.
因自我伤害向医疗服务机构求助后的社会服务利用和转诊情况:系统回顾和叙述性综述
预防自杀是一项重大的公共卫生挑战。由于自残后自杀的风险增加,对自残进行适当的善后护理至关重要。许多自残的前因都涉及到社会因素,基于社会服务的自残善后照顾也有很强的理论基础。我们的目的是回顾社会服务利用的证据和自残后寻求帮助的人的转介。系统回顾与叙事综合。PubMed, PsycINFO, AMED, Social Policy and Practice, EMBASE, Medline, Web of Science, Social Care Online,收录文章引文列表和灰色文献。对自残后接触卫生服务的任何年龄段的人进行研究,研究结果包括转介或利用社会工作者和社会服务。从每个纳入的研究中提取信息,使用形式表,并由两名审稿人对质量进行严格评估。叙述性综合用于审查证据。从共检索到的3414项研究中,纳入了7项研究的10份报告。研究质量一般为高至中等。所有的研究都是在急诊科进行的,大多数是在英国进行的。在仅基于ED数据的研究中,涉及社会服务的比例很低(在大多数研究中,这一比例为1%-4%,尽管当社会工作者参与ED评估时,这一比例高达44%)。在一项使用关联数据的研究中,15%(62/427)的人被转到社会服务机构,21%(466/ 2205)的人在随后的3年里参加了社会服务。总体而言,很少有患者在自残后被转介到社会服务机构。较高的转诊率报告可能反映了更多的服务可获得性,社会工作者参与心理社会评估或更好地捕捉转诊活动。以社会服务为基础的综合自残善后护理是未来预防自杀的重要方向。建议为自残后寻求支持的人改善社会服务和保健服务之间的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信