Gita Devita Anggraeni, Choirun Nissa, Aryu Candra, Dewi Marfu'ah Kurniawati
{"title":"ANALISIS KANDUNGAN GIZI DAN VISKOSITAS FORMULA ENTERAL BERBASIS TEPUNG SORGUM DAN TEPUNG KEDELAI UNTUK DIABETES MELLITUS","authors":"Gita Devita Anggraeni, Choirun Nissa, Aryu Candra, Dewi Marfu'ah Kurniawati","doi":"10.14710/jnc.v12i4.38094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTBackground: Diabetes Mellitus can increase the risk of various comorbidities thus increasing the risk of malnutrition. Administering anti-hyperglycemic enteral formulas based on sorghum flour and soy flour was chosen as an alternative to expensive commercial enteral formulas. The low glycemic index in sorghum and the amino acids arginine, glycine in soybeans are beneficial for controlling blood glucose level.Objective: To analyze and compare the nutritional content and viscosity of the enteral formulas based on sorghum flour and soy flour with commercial enteral formulas.Method: Enteral formula was made from sorghum flour, soy flour, mung bean flour, skim milk, extra virgin olive oil, maltodextrin and sugar. This an experimental study using 3 comparison groups of sorghum flour and soybean flour, namely formula A (3:1), B (7:2), and C (4:1) which were compared with formula D (commercial enteral formula). Carbohydrate, protein, fat, sugar and dietary fiber variables were tested using by by different method, kjehdahl, soxhlet, luff schroll, enzymatic-gravimetric and viscosity was measured using an Ostwald viscometer which was repeated 3 times. Data were analyzed by One Way Anova and Kruskal Wallis tests, except that nutritional content of formula D was not tested.Results: Energy, energy density, and fat formulas A, B and C had significant differences (p<0.001) but formulas A and C had values that were close to formula D. Carbohydrates formulas A, B and C showed significant differences (p<0.05). Dietary fiber cotent of formulas A, B, and C was 46,12 g, 41,54 g, and 73,82 g higher than formula D content of 16 g. Protein enteral formula sorgum flour dan soy flour showed no significant difference (p>0.05) but the levels were lower than formula D. Sugar content of formula A, B C was 4,13%, 5,49%, 5,98% higher than the formula D. The viscosity of enteral formula tepung sorgum dan tepung kedelai was significantly different (p<0.05) with formula D.Conclusion: Formulas A and C are formulas that are similar to commercial enteral formulas based on their energy content, energy density and fat content.Keywords: Diabetes mellitus; enteral formula; sorghum; soybean ABSTRAKLatar belakang: Diabetes Melitus meningkatkan berbagai risiko penyakit komorbid sehingga meningkatkan risiko malnutrisi. Terapi pemberian formula enteral anti hiperglikemia berbasis tepung sorgum dan tepung kedelai dipilih sebagai alternatif pemberian formula enteral komersial yang mahal. Indeks glikemik rendah dalam sorgum serta asam amino arginin, glisin pada kedelai bermanfaat untuk mengontrol kadar glukosa darah.Tujuan: Menganalisis dan membandingkan kandungan gizi dan viskositas formula enteral tepung sorgum dan tepung kedelai dengan formula enteral komersial.Metode: Formula terbuat dari tepung sorgum, tepung kedelai, tepung kacang hijau, susu skim, minyak zaitun ekstra virgin, maltodekstrin dan gula. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksperimental dengan 3 kelompok perbandingan tepung sorgum dan tepung kedelai yang diberi nama formula A (3:1), B (7:2), dan C (4:1) kemudian dibandingkan dengan formula D (formula enteral komersial). Variabel karbohidrat, protein, lemak, gula dan serat pangan diuji menggunakan metode by different, kjeldahl, soxhlet, luff schroll, dan enzimatik-gravimetri serta viskositas diukur menggunakan viskometer ostwald. Data dianalisis dengan uji One Way Anova dan Kruskal Wallis kecuali kandungan gizi formula D tidak diuji.Hasil: Energi, densitas energi, dan lemak formula A, B dan C memiliki perbedaan yang signifikan (p<0,001) namun formula A dan C memiliki nilai yang mendekati formula D. Karbohidrat formula A, B dan C menunjukan perbedaan yang signifikan (p<0,05). Kadar serat pangan formula A, B dan C sebanyak 46,12 g, 41,54 g, dan 73,82 g lebih tinggi dibandingkan formula enteral komersial yaitu 16 g. Protein formula enteral tepung sorgum dan tepung kedelai tidak menunjukan perbedaan yang signifikan (p>0,05) namun kadarnya lebih rendah dibandingkan formula D. Kadar gula formula A, B dan C yaitu 4,13%, 5,49%, 5,98% lebih tinggi dibandingkan formula D.Viskositas formula enteral tepung sorgum dan tepung kedelai berbeda secara signifikan (p<0,05) dengan formula D.Simpulan: Formula A dan C merupakan formula yang memiliki kemiripan dengan formula enteral komersial berdasarkan kandungan energi, densitas energi dan lemaknya.Kata kunci: Diabetes melitus; formula enteral; sorgum; kedelai","PeriodicalId":16594,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutrition College","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nutrition College","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14710/jnc.v12i4.38094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ABSTRACTBackground: Diabetes Mellitus can increase the risk of various comorbidities thus increasing the risk of malnutrition. Administering anti-hyperglycemic enteral formulas based on sorghum flour and soy flour was chosen as an alternative to expensive commercial enteral formulas. The low glycemic index in sorghum and the amino acids arginine, glycine in soybeans are beneficial for controlling blood glucose level.Objective: To analyze and compare the nutritional content and viscosity of the enteral formulas based on sorghum flour and soy flour with commercial enteral formulas.Method: Enteral formula was made from sorghum flour, soy flour, mung bean flour, skim milk, extra virgin olive oil, maltodextrin and sugar. This an experimental study using 3 comparison groups of sorghum flour and soybean flour, namely formula A (3:1), B (7:2), and C (4:1) which were compared with formula D (commercial enteral formula). Carbohydrate, protein, fat, sugar and dietary fiber variables were tested using by by different method, kjehdahl, soxhlet, luff schroll, enzymatic-gravimetric and viscosity was measured using an Ostwald viscometer which was repeated 3 times. Data were analyzed by One Way Anova and Kruskal Wallis tests, except that nutritional content of formula D was not tested.Results: Energy, energy density, and fat formulas A, B and C had significant differences (p<0.001) but formulas A and C had values that were close to formula D. Carbohydrates formulas A, B and C showed significant differences (p<0.05). Dietary fiber cotent of formulas A, B, and C was 46,12 g, 41,54 g, and 73,82 g higher than formula D content of 16 g. Protein enteral formula sorgum flour dan soy flour showed no significant difference (p>0.05) but the levels were lower than formula D. Sugar content of formula A, B C was 4,13%, 5,49%, 5,98% higher than the formula D. The viscosity of enteral formula tepung sorgum dan tepung kedelai was significantly different (p<0.05) with formula D.Conclusion: Formulas A and C are formulas that are similar to commercial enteral formulas based on their energy content, energy density and fat content.Keywords: Diabetes mellitus; enteral formula; sorghum; soybean ABSTRAKLatar belakang: Diabetes Melitus meningkatkan berbagai risiko penyakit komorbid sehingga meningkatkan risiko malnutrisi. Terapi pemberian formula enteral anti hiperglikemia berbasis tepung sorgum dan tepung kedelai dipilih sebagai alternatif pemberian formula enteral komersial yang mahal. Indeks glikemik rendah dalam sorgum serta asam amino arginin, glisin pada kedelai bermanfaat untuk mengontrol kadar glukosa darah.Tujuan: Menganalisis dan membandingkan kandungan gizi dan viskositas formula enteral tepung sorgum dan tepung kedelai dengan formula enteral komersial.Metode: Formula terbuat dari tepung sorgum, tepung kedelai, tepung kacang hijau, susu skim, minyak zaitun ekstra virgin, maltodekstrin dan gula. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksperimental dengan 3 kelompok perbandingan tepung sorgum dan tepung kedelai yang diberi nama formula A (3:1), B (7:2), dan C (4:1) kemudian dibandingkan dengan formula D (formula enteral komersial). Variabel karbohidrat, protein, lemak, gula dan serat pangan diuji menggunakan metode by different, kjeldahl, soxhlet, luff schroll, dan enzimatik-gravimetri serta viskositas diukur menggunakan viskometer ostwald. Data dianalisis dengan uji One Way Anova dan Kruskal Wallis kecuali kandungan gizi formula D tidak diuji.Hasil: Energi, densitas energi, dan lemak formula A, B dan C memiliki perbedaan yang signifikan (p<0,001) namun formula A dan C memiliki nilai yang mendekati formula D. Karbohidrat formula A, B dan C menunjukan perbedaan yang signifikan (p<0,05). Kadar serat pangan formula A, B dan C sebanyak 46,12 g, 41,54 g, dan 73,82 g lebih tinggi dibandingkan formula enteral komersial yaitu 16 g. Protein formula enteral tepung sorgum dan tepung kedelai tidak menunjukan perbedaan yang signifikan (p>0,05) namun kadarnya lebih rendah dibandingkan formula D. Kadar gula formula A, B dan C yaitu 4,13%, 5,49%, 5,98% lebih tinggi dibandingkan formula D.Viskositas formula enteral tepung sorgum dan tepung kedelai berbeda secara signifikan (p<0,05) dengan formula D.Simpulan: Formula A dan C merupakan formula yang memiliki kemiripan dengan formula enteral komersial berdasarkan kandungan energi, densitas energi dan lemaknya.Kata kunci: Diabetes melitus; formula enteral; sorgum; kedelai
摘要背景:糖尿病可增加各种合并症的风险,从而增加营养不良的风险。以高粱粉和大豆粉为基础的抗高血糖肠内配方被选择作为昂贵的商业肠内配方的替代品。高粱中的低血糖指数和大豆中的精氨酸、甘氨酸有利于控制血糖水平。目的:分析比较高粱粉、大豆粉肠内配方与市售肠内配方的营养成分和粘度。方法:采用高粱粉、大豆粉、绿豆粉、脱脂奶、特级初榨橄榄油、麦芽糖糊精和白砂糖配制肠内配方。本试验采用高粱粉和大豆粉3组,即配方A(3:1)、B(7:2)和C(4:1)与配方D(市售肠内配方)进行对比研究。用不同的方法测定碳水化合物、蛋白质、脂肪、糖和膳食纤维的变化,用kjehdahl、soxhlet、luff schroll、酶重法测定,并用奥斯特瓦尔德粘度计测定粘度,重复3次。数据分析采用单因素方差分析(One Way Anova)和Kruskal Wallis检验,但未检测配方D的营养成分。结果:配方A、B、C的能量、能量密度、脂肪含量差异显著(p0.05),但低于配方d。配方A、B、C的含糖量分别比配方d高4、13%、5、49%、5、98%。肠内配方特蓬高粱和特蓬可得莱的黏度差异显著(p0.05)。5、98% lebih tinggi dibandingkan配方D.Viskositas配方肠内tepung sorgum dan tepung kedelai berbeda secara signfikan (p< 0.05)邓干配方D.Simpulan: A配方丹C merupakan配方yang memiliki kemiripan邓干配方肠内berdasarkan kandungan energi, densitas energi dan maknya。Kata kunci:糖尿病;肠内公式;sorgum;kedelai