Multi-stakeholder approach for dealing with Trafficking in Persons: The case of Ghana

L. Kandilige, G. A. Ampah
{"title":"Multi-stakeholder approach for dealing with Trafficking in Persons: The case of Ghana","authors":"L. Kandilige, G. A. Ampah","doi":"10.4314/gjg.v15i3.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Trafficking in persons has posed challenges to governments and security agencies globally. Advocacy, investigative and prosecutorial attempts have been deployed by specialised agencies in an attempt to disrupt and dismantle criminal networks that perpetuate trafficking. However, the ‘silo’ approach has yielded limited results. Using mainly qualitative research methods among representatives of government ministries, departments and agencies as well as officials from non-governmental organisations, civil society organisations and development partners, we argue that multi-stakeholder collaborations are essential for the co-creation of a coherent solution to the menace of Trafficking in Persons (TIP). We conclude that multistakeholder collaborations and the ‘4 Ps’ strategy of prevention, protection, prosecution and partnership within the Ghanaian context have shown that adequate resourcing of the national plan and close monitoring and evaluation of implementation activities could provide the best possible pathway to dealing with these seemingly intractable societal problems. Moreover, we conclude that the multi-stakeholder approach potentially offers access to more resources by drawing on the full range of technical, human, knowledge, physical and financial resources embedded in all sectors and among all actors.","PeriodicalId":479481,"journal":{"name":"Ghana Journal of Geography","volume":"14 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ghana Journal of Geography","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/gjg.v15i3.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Trafficking in persons has posed challenges to governments and security agencies globally. Advocacy, investigative and prosecutorial attempts have been deployed by specialised agencies in an attempt to disrupt and dismantle criminal networks that perpetuate trafficking. However, the ‘silo’ approach has yielded limited results. Using mainly qualitative research methods among representatives of government ministries, departments and agencies as well as officials from non-governmental organisations, civil society organisations and development partners, we argue that multi-stakeholder collaborations are essential for the co-creation of a coherent solution to the menace of Trafficking in Persons (TIP). We conclude that multistakeholder collaborations and the ‘4 Ps’ strategy of prevention, protection, prosecution and partnership within the Ghanaian context have shown that adequate resourcing of the national plan and close monitoring and evaluation of implementation activities could provide the best possible pathway to dealing with these seemingly intractable societal problems. Moreover, we conclude that the multi-stakeholder approach potentially offers access to more resources by drawing on the full range of technical, human, knowledge, physical and financial resources embedded in all sectors and among all actors.
处理人口贩运问题的多方利益攸关方方法:加纳案例
人口贩运对全球各国政府和安全机构构成了挑战。专门机构进行了宣传、调查和起诉,试图破坏和摧毁使贩运活动永久化的犯罪网络。然而,这种“筒仓”方法产生的效果有限。我们主要使用定性研究方法,对政府部委、部门和机构的代表以及非政府组织、民间社会组织和发展伙伴的官员进行研究,认为多方利益相关者的合作对于共同制定应对人口贩运威胁的一致解决方案至关重要。我们的结论是,在加纳的背景下,多方利益相关者合作和预防、保护、起诉和伙伴关系的“4p”战略表明,为国家计划提供充足的资源,并对执行活动进行密切监测和评估,可以为处理这些看似棘手的社会问题提供最佳途径。此外,我们得出的结论是,多方利益相关者方法有可能通过利用所有部门和所有行为者中嵌入的各种技术、人力、知识、物质和财政资源,提供获得更多资源的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信