Revisiting Secondary Education Reform in China: Comparing the Perceptions of Teachers and Students between 2012 and 2022

Yixiang Jin, Yee Han Peter Joong, Rose Gibbs
{"title":"Revisiting Secondary Education Reform in China: Comparing the Perceptions of Teachers and Students between 2012 and 2022","authors":"Yixiang Jin, Yee Han Peter Joong, Rose Gibbs","doi":"10.59863/zuxn4915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This mixed methods study compares how secondary school teachers implemented Education Reform in China in 2012 and 2022. The survey asked how often a teaching or evaluation strategy was used. The conclusions of the current study indicate that even though teacher-directed lessons (teacher talk, questioning, and discussions) still dominated, sample teachers were able to use a variety of student-centered learning (SCL) methods (activities and group work) in accordance with the Reform initiatives. A significant obstacle to reform remains high-stakes examinations, which rely heavily on rote memorization, rather than the creative application of knowledge.","PeriodicalId":72586,"journal":{"name":"Chinese/English journal of educational measurement and evaluation","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese/English journal of educational measurement and evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59863/zuxn4915","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This mixed methods study compares how secondary school teachers implemented Education Reform in China in 2012 and 2022. The survey asked how often a teaching or evaluation strategy was used. The conclusions of the current study indicate that even though teacher-directed lessons (teacher talk, questioning, and discussions) still dominated, sample teachers were able to use a variety of student-centered learning (SCL) methods (activities and group work) in accordance with the Reform initiatives. A significant obstacle to reform remains high-stakes examinations, which rely heavily on rote memorization, rather than the creative application of knowledge.
重新审视中国的中学教育改革:比较 2012 年和 2022 年师生的看法
这项混合方法研究比较了2012年和2022年中国中学教师实施教育改革的情况。调查询问了教学或评估策略的使用频率。本研究的结论表明,尽管教师指导的课程(教师谈话、提问和讨论)仍然占主导地位,样本教师能够根据改革倡议使用各种以学生为中心的学习(SCL)方法(活动和小组工作)。改革的一个重大障碍仍然是高风险考试,这种考试严重依赖死记硬背,而不是创造性地应用知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信