The Boundary of the Reduction of Citizens’ Right to Education in Major Public Emergencies

Xiner Ni
{"title":"The Boundary of the Reduction of Citizens’ Right to Education in Major Public Emergencies","authors":"Xiner Ni","doi":"10.56397/slj.2023.12.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The boundary of the reduction of citizens’ right to education in major public emergencies is an important practical issue that adheres to the rule of law principle and the bottom line of social justice. Understanding the constitutional connotation of the right to education and judging whether the major public emergencies represented by the COVID-19 pandemic can provide a legitimate basis for its reduction is an important premise for the study of this issue. According to the relevant provisions of China’s Constitution and laws and the academic research on the connotation of the right to education, the right to education is the basic right of citizens, with the dual attributes of right and duty, freedom and social rights, equality and process. According to the theory of “minimum human rights” and “non-derogable rights”, major public emergencies can provide a certain justification for the reduction of the right to education, but this kind of reduction has a boundary. In constructing the boundary of the reduction of the right to education, the bottom line should be that the substance of the right to education should not be violated, the coordination and unity of the individual interests of educated citizens and the social public interests to curb the spread of the epidemic should be the key, and the principle of proportionality should be the guideline.","PeriodicalId":377631,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Law and Justice","volume":"99 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Law and Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56397/slj.2023.12.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The boundary of the reduction of citizens’ right to education in major public emergencies is an important practical issue that adheres to the rule of law principle and the bottom line of social justice. Understanding the constitutional connotation of the right to education and judging whether the major public emergencies represented by the COVID-19 pandemic can provide a legitimate basis for its reduction is an important premise for the study of this issue. According to the relevant provisions of China’s Constitution and laws and the academic research on the connotation of the right to education, the right to education is the basic right of citizens, with the dual attributes of right and duty, freedom and social rights, equality and process. According to the theory of “minimum human rights” and “non-derogable rights”, major public emergencies can provide a certain justification for the reduction of the right to education, but this kind of reduction has a boundary. In constructing the boundary of the reduction of the right to education, the bottom line should be that the substance of the right to education should not be violated, the coordination and unity of the individual interests of educated citizens and the social public interests to curb the spread of the epidemic should be the key, and the principle of proportionality should be the guideline.
重大突发公共事件中公民受教育权的减损边界
重大突发公共事件中公民受教育权削减的边界问题,是一个坚持法治原则和社会正义底线的重要现实问题。理解受教育权的宪法内涵,判断以新冠肺炎疫情为代表的重大突发公共事件能否为减少受教育权提供合法依据,是研究这一问题的重要前提。根据中国宪法和法律的有关规定以及学术界对受教育权内涵的研究,受教育权是公民的基本权利,具有权利与义务、自由与社会权利、平等与过程的双重属性。根据“最低人权”和“不可克减权利”理论,重大突发公共事件可以为受教育权的削减提供一定的理由,但这种削减是有边界的。在构建受教育权削减的边界时,应以不侵犯受教育权的实质为底线,以受教育公民个人利益与遏制疫情蔓延的社会公共利益的协调统一为重点,以比例原则为指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信