Generations: The Real Differences between Gen Z, Millennials, Gen X, Boomers, and Silents—and What They Mean for America’s Future

IF 0.2 0 RELIGION
J. Twenge
{"title":"Generations: The Real Differences between Gen Z, Millennials, Gen X, Boomers, and Silents—and What They Mean for America’s Future","authors":"J. Twenge","doi":"10.56315/pscf12-23twenge","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"GENERATIONS: The Real Differences between Gen Z, Millennials, Gen X, Boomers, and Silents--and What They Mean for America's Future by Jean M. Twenge. New York: Atria Books, 2023. 560 pages. Hardcover; $32.50. ISBN: 9781982181611. E-book; $16.99. ASIN: B0B3Y9RSFP. *\"Thinking without comparison is unthinkable. And, in the absence of comparison, so is all scientific thought and scientific research.\" --Sociologist Guy Swanson, 1971 *Certainly, the ideas behind Swanson's observations guide the work of San Diego State University psychologist Jean M. Twenge, who has published scores of peer-reviewed empirical studies comparing the responses of different birth cohorts (generations) on the same social survey questions over time. Although limited to the United States here, her empirical research mostly compares present attitudes to past ones and compares different generations to each other in the same time frame. She has long been thinking with comparisons. *Twenge's previous book, iGen (2017), drew on publicly available data from four major social surveys to argue convincingly that social media heavily influenced Gen Z (composed of people born between 1995 and 2012), often to their physical and psychological detriment. In her sequel, Twenge seeks to widen the scope and the audience for such research and even purports to predict the future of America. Even if the science of comparing generational cohorts will fall short in predicting the future (as seems likely), readers will benefit from learning about typical traits of different generations or birth cohorts in the United States. *Generations compares six generations of Americans: the Silent generation (born 1925-1945), Baby Boomers (born 1946-1964), Generation X (born 1965-1979), Millennials (born 1980-1994), Generation Z (born 1995-2012), and Polars (born 2013-present). Each of the substantive chapters (chaps. 2-7) focuses on a single generation and contrasts its members' average responses on a wide array of social survey questions from twenty-four datasets with a combined number of 39 million respondents. Most readers will be able to identify family, friends, and neighbors from each generation that exemplify some of the attitudes that Twenge labels as distinctive. *Twenge constantly uses charts to show differences between generations and average attitudinal shifts over time. While the book is hefty and full of statistics and charts that can occasionally overwhelm the reader, the prose is mostly lively and sprinkled with humor. The overall impact is to convince the reader that generational cohorts do tend to share outlooks. My copy is studded with post-it flags marking places in the text where her observations surprised me or nailed down something I had only vaguely sensed before. As a member of Generation X, for instance, I was surprised at how many traits identified by Twenge resonated with my own life experiences, and I suspect other readers will have similar \"aha\" moments for their generation. They can also gain a new appreciation for how other generations have impacted American society. *How have generational cohorts come to differ? Twenge's thesis, laid out on pages 4-19, is that technological changes drive generational differences, often mediated by individualism and a \"slow-life strategy, with lower birth rates, slower development, and more resources and care put into each child\" (p. 18). With lower death rates, longer life expectancies, and technological changes, younger generations can take their time in finishing their education, starting their careers, marrying, buying a home, and having children--if they even decide to have children at all. As Twenge notes, \"By 2020, the birth rate for both teens and for women in their early 20s was the lowest it had ever been since records were first kept in 1918--about half of what it was in 1990\" (p. 377). The slow-life strategy, ascendant for the younger generations, might be the most important shift described in the book, along with declines in religious belief and behavior. *Even if academic researchers might want to quibble about her use of \"technology\" as a very broad, catch-all term, it is impossible to dispute that these trends are in motion for the typical members of these cohorts. The effects are evident to anyone who knows college-educated young adults in their twenties or thirties. They are less likely to marry, less likely to have children, less likely to attend religious services, and less likely to hold traditional views of gender identity when compared to previous generations. Cross-national comparisons with Canada and other industrialized countries--as well as more diverse countries--might help clarify the reasons for such generational shifts of attitudes and behaviors. *Furthermore, when the book seeks to predict the future in the final chapter, it feels forced. Twenge herself cites at least three failed predictions made by Neil Howe and William Strauss, the previous gurus of generational analysis (p. 295). Readers thirty years from now should return to this volume to see how well Twenge's predictions have held up. One suspects that we will be surprised by some unforeseen trends. *Notably for the readers of this journal, measures of religious observance and belief show steep declines that began with Millennials (born 1980-1994) and continued with Gen Z (born 1995-2012). This is a troubling trend for anyone who cares about social well-being. As Twenge notes, \"Humans have an innate desire to believe in something larger than themselves and to seek meaning in their lives. If religion stops filling this role, something else will step in to fill it\" (p. 504). Twenge cannot help but express a concern for the future of American society here and elsewhere. Christian scholars should join her. After all, our faith is transmitted through the generations. As Psalm 145:4 says, \"One generation commends your works to another; they tell of your mighty acts.\" Are we failing to transmit the story to younger generations? This book compiles extensive evidence that we might be--and that American society might be worse off as a result. *Generations is best understood less as an attempt to advance psychological science and more as a concerned American psychologist's data-studded jeremiad. Twenge compares thousands of data points in order to persuade us to care about the future of American society, which has promoted individualism to the detriment of collective well-being. Those called to love their neighbor would do well to study the trends here and ponder how they can care better for all generations of those neighbors. For those of who us are part of a kingdom that \"endures through all generations\" (Ps. 145:13), we can learn from Twenge how to reach members of each of the generations alive today while promoting a less individualistic society. *Reviewed by Scott Waalkes, Professor of International Politics and Director of General Education, Malone University, Canton, OH 44709.","PeriodicalId":53927,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith","volume":"10 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56315/pscf12-23twenge","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

GENERATIONS: The Real Differences between Gen Z, Millennials, Gen X, Boomers, and Silents--and What They Mean for America's Future by Jean M. Twenge. New York: Atria Books, 2023. 560 pages. Hardcover; $32.50. ISBN: 9781982181611. E-book; $16.99. ASIN: B0B3Y9RSFP. *"Thinking without comparison is unthinkable. And, in the absence of comparison, so is all scientific thought and scientific research." --Sociologist Guy Swanson, 1971 *Certainly, the ideas behind Swanson's observations guide the work of San Diego State University psychologist Jean M. Twenge, who has published scores of peer-reviewed empirical studies comparing the responses of different birth cohorts (generations) on the same social survey questions over time. Although limited to the United States here, her empirical research mostly compares present attitudes to past ones and compares different generations to each other in the same time frame. She has long been thinking with comparisons. *Twenge's previous book, iGen (2017), drew on publicly available data from four major social surveys to argue convincingly that social media heavily influenced Gen Z (composed of people born between 1995 and 2012), often to their physical and psychological detriment. In her sequel, Twenge seeks to widen the scope and the audience for such research and even purports to predict the future of America. Even if the science of comparing generational cohorts will fall short in predicting the future (as seems likely), readers will benefit from learning about typical traits of different generations or birth cohorts in the United States. *Generations compares six generations of Americans: the Silent generation (born 1925-1945), Baby Boomers (born 1946-1964), Generation X (born 1965-1979), Millennials (born 1980-1994), Generation Z (born 1995-2012), and Polars (born 2013-present). Each of the substantive chapters (chaps. 2-7) focuses on a single generation and contrasts its members' average responses on a wide array of social survey questions from twenty-four datasets with a combined number of 39 million respondents. Most readers will be able to identify family, friends, and neighbors from each generation that exemplify some of the attitudes that Twenge labels as distinctive. *Twenge constantly uses charts to show differences between generations and average attitudinal shifts over time. While the book is hefty and full of statistics and charts that can occasionally overwhelm the reader, the prose is mostly lively and sprinkled with humor. The overall impact is to convince the reader that generational cohorts do tend to share outlooks. My copy is studded with post-it flags marking places in the text where her observations surprised me or nailed down something I had only vaguely sensed before. As a member of Generation X, for instance, I was surprised at how many traits identified by Twenge resonated with my own life experiences, and I suspect other readers will have similar "aha" moments for their generation. They can also gain a new appreciation for how other generations have impacted American society. *How have generational cohorts come to differ? Twenge's thesis, laid out on pages 4-19, is that technological changes drive generational differences, often mediated by individualism and a "slow-life strategy, with lower birth rates, slower development, and more resources and care put into each child" (p. 18). With lower death rates, longer life expectancies, and technological changes, younger generations can take their time in finishing their education, starting their careers, marrying, buying a home, and having children--if they even decide to have children at all. As Twenge notes, "By 2020, the birth rate for both teens and for women in their early 20s was the lowest it had ever been since records were first kept in 1918--about half of what it was in 1990" (p. 377). The slow-life strategy, ascendant for the younger generations, might be the most important shift described in the book, along with declines in religious belief and behavior. *Even if academic researchers might want to quibble about her use of "technology" as a very broad, catch-all term, it is impossible to dispute that these trends are in motion for the typical members of these cohorts. The effects are evident to anyone who knows college-educated young adults in their twenties or thirties. They are less likely to marry, less likely to have children, less likely to attend religious services, and less likely to hold traditional views of gender identity when compared to previous generations. Cross-national comparisons with Canada and other industrialized countries--as well as more diverse countries--might help clarify the reasons for such generational shifts of attitudes and behaviors. *Furthermore, when the book seeks to predict the future in the final chapter, it feels forced. Twenge herself cites at least three failed predictions made by Neil Howe and William Strauss, the previous gurus of generational analysis (p. 295). Readers thirty years from now should return to this volume to see how well Twenge's predictions have held up. One suspects that we will be surprised by some unforeseen trends. *Notably for the readers of this journal, measures of religious observance and belief show steep declines that began with Millennials (born 1980-1994) and continued with Gen Z (born 1995-2012). This is a troubling trend for anyone who cares about social well-being. As Twenge notes, "Humans have an innate desire to believe in something larger than themselves and to seek meaning in their lives. If religion stops filling this role, something else will step in to fill it" (p. 504). Twenge cannot help but express a concern for the future of American society here and elsewhere. Christian scholars should join her. After all, our faith is transmitted through the generations. As Psalm 145:4 says, "One generation commends your works to another; they tell of your mighty acts." Are we failing to transmit the story to younger generations? This book compiles extensive evidence that we might be--and that American society might be worse off as a result. *Generations is best understood less as an attempt to advance psychological science and more as a concerned American psychologist's data-studded jeremiad. Twenge compares thousands of data points in order to persuade us to care about the future of American society, which has promoted individualism to the detriment of collective well-being. Those called to love their neighbor would do well to study the trends here and ponder how they can care better for all generations of those neighbors. For those of who us are part of a kingdom that "endures through all generations" (Ps. 145:13), we can learn from Twenge how to reach members of each of the generations alive today while promoting a less individualistic society. *Reviewed by Scott Waalkes, Professor of International Politics and Director of General Education, Malone University, Canton, OH 44709.
世代:Z世代、千禧世代、X世代、潮世代和沉默世代之间的真正差异--以及它们对美国未来的意义
《世代:Z世代、千禧一代、X世代、婴儿潮一代和沉默世代之间的真正差异——以及它们对美国未来的意义》,作者:Jean M. Twenge纽约:阿特里亚图书公司,2023年。560页。精装书;32.50美元。ISBN: 9781982181611。电子书;16.99美元。最佳翻译:B0B3Y9RSFP。*“没有比较的思考是不可想象的。如果没有比较,所有的科学思想和科学研究都是如此。”——社会学家盖伊·斯旺森,1971年*当然,斯旺森观察背后的思想指导了圣地亚哥州立大学心理学家吉恩·m·特温格的工作,他发表了许多同行评议的实证研究,比较了不同出生群体(世代)在同一社会调查问题上的反应。虽然仅限于美国,但她的实证研究主要是将现在的态度与过去的态度进行比较,并将同一时间段内的不同代人进行比较。她一直在用比较来思考问题。*特温格的上一本书《iGen》(2017)利用了四项主要社会调查的公开数据,令人信服地认为,社交媒体严重影响了Z世代(由1995年至2012年出生的人组成),往往对他们的身心造成损害。在她的续集中,特温格试图扩大这种研究的范围和受众,甚至声称要预测美国的未来。即使比较世代群体的科学无法预测未来(这似乎很有可能),读者也会从了解美国不同世代或出生群体的典型特征中受益。*《世代》比较了六代美国人:沉默的一代(生于1925-1945年)、婴儿潮一代(生于1946-1964年)、X一代(生于1965-1979年)、千禧一代(生于1980-1994年)、Z一代(生于1995-2012年)和北极星一代(生于2013年至今)。每一个实质性的章节(章)。2-7)聚焦于一代人,并对比了其成员对来自24个数据集的广泛社会调查问题的平均回答,这些数据集共有3900万受访者。大多数读者都能从每一代人的家庭、朋友和邻居中找到一些能体现特温格所标榜的独特态度的例子。Twenge经常使用图表来显示代际差异和随着时间的平均态度变化。虽然这本书很厚,充满了统计数据和图表,有时会让读者不知所措,但它的散文大多是活泼的,点缀着幽默。总体影响是让读者相信,同代人确实倾向于分享观点。我的稿子上贴满了便利贴,标出了她的观察让我惊讶的地方,或者明确了我以前只模模糊糊感觉到的东西。例如,作为X世代的一员,我很惊讶地发现,特温格所识别的许多特征与我自己的生活经历产生了共鸣,我怀疑其他读者也会有类似的“顿悟”时刻。他们还可以重新认识到其他几代人是如何影响美国社会的。*代际人群是如何产生差异的?在第4-19页上,特温格的论点是,技术变革推动了代际差异,而这种差异往往是由个人主义和“低出生率、慢发展、对每个孩子投入更多资源和照顾的慢生活策略”(第18页)介导的。随着死亡率降低、预期寿命延长和技术变革,年轻一代可以从容地完成学业、开始职业生涯、结婚、买房和生孩子——如果他们甚至决定要孩子的话。正如特温格所指出的那样,“到2020年,青少年和20岁出头女性的出生率都是自1918年有记录以来的最低水平——大约是1990年的一半”(第377页)。在年轻一代中占主导地位的慢生活策略,可能是书中描述的最重要的转变,此外还有宗教信仰和行为的减少。*即使学术研究人员可能会对她将“技术”作为一个非常广泛、包罗万象的术语进行吹毛求疵,但不可否认的是,这些趋势正在这些群体中的典型成员身上发生变化。任何认识20多岁或30多岁受过大学教育的年轻人的人都能明显感受到这种影响。与前几代人相比,他们不太可能结婚,不太可能生孩子,不太可能参加宗教仪式,也不太可能持有传统的性别认同观点。与加拿大和其他工业化国家以及更多样化的国家进行跨国比较,可能有助于澄清这种态度和行为的代际转变的原因。*此外,当这本书在最后一章试图预测未来时,感觉很勉强。 特温格自己引用了尼尔·豪(Neil Howe)和威廉·施特劳斯(William Strauss)至少三个失败的预测,他们是代际分析的前辈(第295页)。三十年后的读者应该重新阅读这本书,看看特温格的预言是否站得住脚。有人怀疑,我们会对一些无法预料的趋势感到惊讶。*值得注意的是,对于本杂志的读者来说,宗教仪式和信仰的衡量指标显示,从千禧一代(1980-1994年出生)开始急剧下降,Z一代(1995-2012年出生)继续下降。对于任何关心社会福祉的人来说,这是一个令人不安的趋势。正如特温格所指出的,“人类有一种天生的欲望,去相信比自己更重要的东西,去寻找生活的意义。如果宗教不再扮演这个角色,其他的东西就会取而代之”(第504页)。特温格不禁表达了对美国社会在这里和其他地方的未来的担忧。基督教学者应该加入她的行列。毕竟,我们的信仰是代代相传的。正如诗篇145:4所说:“这代人称赞你的作为;他们传扬你大能的作为。”我们是否未能将这个故事传递给年轻一代?这本书收集了大量证据,证明我们可能是——美国社会可能因此变得更糟。*《世代》最好不要被理解为推动心理科学的尝试,而更应该被理解为一位忧心忡忡的美国心理学家的数据丰富的哀嚎。为了说服我们关心美国社会的未来,特温格比较了成千上万的数据点,美国社会推崇个人主义,损害了集体福祉。那些被召唤去爱他们的邻居的人应该好好研究一下这里的趋势,思考一下他们如何才能更好地关心这些邻居的所有世代。对于我们这些属于“存到万代”王国的人(诗篇145:13),我们可以从特温格那里学习如何在促进一个不那么个人主义的社会的同时,接触到今天活着的每一代人。*由俄亥俄州坎顿市马龙大学国际政治学教授兼通识教育主任斯科特·瓦克斯(Scott Waalkes)审阅。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
57.10%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信