Time course from cochlear implant surgery to non-use for congenitally deaf recipients implanted as children over ten years ago

IF 1.3 Q3 REHABILITATION
Catherine Killan, Han Cao, Angela Cordingley, David Strachan
{"title":"Time course from cochlear implant surgery to non-use for congenitally deaf recipients implanted as children over ten years ago","authors":"Catherine Killan, Han Cao, Angela Cordingley, David Strachan","doi":"10.3389/fresc.2023.1283109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To determine the time-course from first cochlear implantation to non-use, to characterise non-users' receptive and expressive communication, and document known risk factors for inconsistent use, for congenitally deaf non-users of cochlear implants implanted as children at least ten years ago.Retrospective service evaluation. All congenitally deaf patients who received a first cochlear implant as children at least ten years ago at a regional service, and were currently non-users, were identified. They were characterised in terms of ages at implantation and non-use, known risk factors for inconsistent CI use or CI non-use, and outcome measures were the Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale (MAIS) and Meaningful Use of Speech Scale (MUSS) scores.Seventeen patients met the inclusion criteria. They were implanted from 1990 to 2006. Median age at implantation was 4 years (range: 2–11), median age at non-use was 17 years (range: 9–31), and median duration of use was 8.5 years (range: 4–25). All used sign or gesture as their primary expressive and receptive communication modes. In addition, each child had at least one other known risk factor for inconsistent CI use. At 3 years post-implantation, mean Parent-rated MAIS scores were 76.5% (N = 14), and mean MUSS scores were 43.1% (N = 9).This cohort included cases where CI use was rejected following longer periods of time than previously reported, highlighting a need for long-term support, particularly around the ages of life transitions. Studies conducted when the earliest cohort of paediatric CI users were younger, and studies reliant on parent or patient reports, may under-estimate long-term non-use rates. No non-users were identified among congenitally-deaf children implanted 10–15 years ago. Further research is warranted to explore relationships between risk factors, including communication mode, and non-use to inform expectation setting and candidacy selection.","PeriodicalId":73102,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2023.1283109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To determine the time-course from first cochlear implantation to non-use, to characterise non-users' receptive and expressive communication, and document known risk factors for inconsistent use, for congenitally deaf non-users of cochlear implants implanted as children at least ten years ago.Retrospective service evaluation. All congenitally deaf patients who received a first cochlear implant as children at least ten years ago at a regional service, and were currently non-users, were identified. They were characterised in terms of ages at implantation and non-use, known risk factors for inconsistent CI use or CI non-use, and outcome measures were the Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale (MAIS) and Meaningful Use of Speech Scale (MUSS) scores.Seventeen patients met the inclusion criteria. They were implanted from 1990 to 2006. Median age at implantation was 4 years (range: 2–11), median age at non-use was 17 years (range: 9–31), and median duration of use was 8.5 years (range: 4–25). All used sign or gesture as their primary expressive and receptive communication modes. In addition, each child had at least one other known risk factor for inconsistent CI use. At 3 years post-implantation, mean Parent-rated MAIS scores were 76.5% (N = 14), and mean MUSS scores were 43.1% (N = 9).This cohort included cases where CI use was rejected following longer periods of time than previously reported, highlighting a need for long-term support, particularly around the ages of life transitions. Studies conducted when the earliest cohort of paediatric CI users were younger, and studies reliant on parent or patient reports, may under-estimate long-term non-use rates. No non-users were identified among congenitally-deaf children implanted 10–15 years ago. Further research is warranted to explore relationships between risk factors, including communication mode, and non-use to inform expectation setting and candidacy selection.
十多年前植入人工耳蜗的先天性耳聋患者从接受手术到不再使用人工耳蜗的时间过程
确定从第一次人工耳蜗植入到不使用的时间过程,表征非使用者的接受性和表达性沟通,并记录已知的不一致使用的危险因素,对于至少十年前植入人工耳蜗的先天性耳聋非使用者。回顾性服务评价。所有在儿童时期至少十年前接受过第一次人工耳蜗植入的先天性失聪患者,以及目前未使用人工耳蜗的患者,都被确定。他们的特征是植入和未使用的年龄,不一致CI使用或未使用CI的已知危险因素,结果测量是有意义的听觉整合量表(MAIS)和有意义的言语使用量表(MUSS)得分。17例患者符合纳入标准。它们在1990年至2006年期间被植入。植入时的中位年龄为4岁(范围:2-11岁),未使用时的中位年龄为17岁(范围:9-31岁),中位使用时间为8.5年(范围:4 - 25岁)。他们都使用手势或手势作为主要的表达和接受交流方式。此外,每个孩子至少有一个其他已知的不一致CI使用的危险因素。植入后3年,父母评定的MAIS平均评分为76.5% (N = 14), MUSS平均评分为43.1% (N = 9)。该队列包括在比先前报道的更长的时间后拒绝使用CI的病例,强调需要长期支持,特别是在生活转变的年龄。当最早的儿童CI使用者队列较年轻时进行的研究,以及依赖于父母或患者报告的研究,可能会低估长期不使用率。在10-15年前植入的先天性耳聋儿童中没有发现非使用者。有必要进一步研究风险因素之间的关系,包括沟通模式和不使用,以告知期望设定和候选人选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信