Coverage and beyond: how can private governance support key elements of the Global Biodiversity Framework’s Target 3?

Alanah Hayley Lewis, Bex Gottlieb, Brett Wilson, Jack Sutton, Janeth Lessmann, G. Delli, Grégoire Dubois, Heather C. Bingham
{"title":"Coverage and beyond: how can private governance support key elements of the Global Biodiversity Framework’s Target 3?","authors":"Alanah Hayley Lewis, Bex Gottlieb, Brett Wilson, Jack Sutton, Janeth Lessmann, G. Delli, Grégoire Dubois, Heather C. Bingham","doi":"10.3389/fcosc.2023.1303801","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A vast cross-societal effort will be needed to achieve the ambition of protecting and conserving 30% of the earth’s lands and oceans by 2030, as called for in Target 3 of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework. While focus is often given to the 30% coverage aspect of this target, other elements – on the location and effectiveness of protected and conserved areas – are equally important. As the implementation of Target 3 progresses, it is increasingly acknowledged that non-profit organisations, for-profit organisations, and individual landowners play a key role by choosing to manage their lands and waters to deliver conservation outcomes. However, privately protected and conserved areas lack recognition by many governments charged with reporting progress on the target. For countries and territories where these areas have been reported, we use the World Database on Protected Areas to explore their contribution towards elements of Target 3, particularly coverage, connectivity and ecological representation. In addition, we explore how privately governed ‘other effective area-based conservation measures’ contribute to Target 3 in countries and territories where they have been identified. Our results demonstrate that privately protected and conserved areas play a significant role in some countries’ efforts to meet Target 3. Since these areas are known to be under-reported, we stress the need for scaled up efforts for their recognition and documentation. This is vital not only for Target 3 tracking and implementation, but to ensure private actors receive appropriate recognition and support for their role in tackling the biodiversity and climate crises.","PeriodicalId":484005,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in conservation science","volume":"121 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in conservation science","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcosc.2023.1303801","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A vast cross-societal effort will be needed to achieve the ambition of protecting and conserving 30% of the earth’s lands and oceans by 2030, as called for in Target 3 of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework. While focus is often given to the 30% coverage aspect of this target, other elements – on the location and effectiveness of protected and conserved areas – are equally important. As the implementation of Target 3 progresses, it is increasingly acknowledged that non-profit organisations, for-profit organisations, and individual landowners play a key role by choosing to manage their lands and waters to deliver conservation outcomes. However, privately protected and conserved areas lack recognition by many governments charged with reporting progress on the target. For countries and territories where these areas have been reported, we use the World Database on Protected Areas to explore their contribution towards elements of Target 3, particularly coverage, connectivity and ecological representation. In addition, we explore how privately governed ‘other effective area-based conservation measures’ contribute to Target 3 in countries and territories where they have been identified. Our results demonstrate that privately protected and conserved areas play a significant role in some countries’ efforts to meet Target 3. Since these areas are known to be under-reported, we stress the need for scaled up efforts for their recognition and documentation. This is vital not only for Target 3 tracking and implementation, but to ensure private actors receive appropriate recognition and support for their role in tackling the biodiversity and climate crises.
覆盖范围及其他:私人治理如何支持全球生物多样性框架目标 3 的关键要素?
根据《昆明-蒙特利尔全球生物多样性框架》的目标3,要实现到2030年保护和养护地球30%的土地和海洋的宏伟目标,需要全社会的共同努力。虽然这一目标的重点往往放在30%的覆盖率方面,但其他因素——关于受保护和自然保护区的位置和有效性——也同样重要。随着目标3的实施进展,越来越多的人认识到,非营利性组织、营利性组织和个人土地所有者在选择管理其土地和水域以实现保护成果方面发挥着关键作用。然而,私人保护和保护区缺乏许多负责报告目标进展的政府的认可。对于已报告这些区域的国家和地区,我们使用世界保护区数据库来探索它们对目标3要素的贡献,特别是覆盖率、连通性和生态代表性。此外,我们还探讨了私人管理的“其他有效的基于区域的保护措施”如何在已确定的国家和地区为目标3做出贡献。我们的研究结果表明,私人保护区和保护区在一些国家实现目标3的努力中发挥了重要作用。由于已知这些领域的报告不足,我们强调需要加大努力,以确认和记录这些领域的情况。这不仅对于目标3的跟踪和实施至关重要,而且对于确保私人行为体在应对生物多样性和气候危机方面的作用得到适当的承认和支持也至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信