Green Cement Valuation: An Optimistic Approach to Carbon Dioxide Reduction

IF 1 Q4 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
U. Siddique, M. Jawad, Asif Ali, S. M. Cheema, M. Adil Sultan, M. Jamshaid Akhtar
{"title":"Green Cement Valuation: An Optimistic Approach to Carbon Dioxide Reduction","authors":"U. Siddique, M. Jawad, Asif Ali, S. M. Cheema, M. Adil Sultan, M. Jamshaid Akhtar","doi":"10.2478/jaes-2023-0033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article discusses a variety of more recent alternatives to Portland cement (OPC) that can lower energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. Some of these new binders can be made utilizing fuels and low-grade industrial waste. Only after thorough examination of various physico-mechanical, microstructural, and durability properties can the practical viability of these alternative binders be substantiated .In this review paper seven important alternative cementitious binder systems i.e. Supplemental cementitious in place of OPC in some cases, Industrial By-Products, Alternative cements, Concrete Made Using Garbage as Aggregate, Carbona table Calcium Silicate Cement, Cements With a Calcium Hydro silicate Base, Eggshell waste for sustainable construction materials are discussed. It was deduced that all of the more recent cementitious binders could be created utilizing industrial wastes such as low-grade limestone or clay, fly ash, and slags. This would result in the achievement of the desired physico-mechanical and durability properties, as well as a decrease in cost and energy consumption of between 20 and 58 percent. In addition, the creation of the aforementioned alternative binder results in a reduction of greenhouse gases that is anywhere from 15–55%.","PeriodicalId":44808,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Engineering Sciences","volume":" 1","pages":"259 - 268"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Engineering Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/jaes-2023-0033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This article discusses a variety of more recent alternatives to Portland cement (OPC) that can lower energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. Some of these new binders can be made utilizing fuels and low-grade industrial waste. Only after thorough examination of various physico-mechanical, microstructural, and durability properties can the practical viability of these alternative binders be substantiated .In this review paper seven important alternative cementitious binder systems i.e. Supplemental cementitious in place of OPC in some cases, Industrial By-Products, Alternative cements, Concrete Made Using Garbage as Aggregate, Carbona table Calcium Silicate Cement, Cements With a Calcium Hydro silicate Base, Eggshell waste for sustainable construction materials are discussed. It was deduced that all of the more recent cementitious binders could be created utilizing industrial wastes such as low-grade limestone or clay, fly ash, and slags. This would result in the achievement of the desired physico-mechanical and durability properties, as well as a decrease in cost and energy consumption of between 20 and 58 percent. In addition, the creation of the aforementioned alternative binder results in a reduction of greenhouse gases that is anywhere from 15–55%.
绿色水泥评估:减少二氧化碳的乐观方法
摘要本文讨论了波特兰水泥(OPC)的各种最新替代品,可以降低能耗和温室气体排放。其中一些新型粘合剂可以利用燃料和低品位的工业废料制成。只有在对各种物理力学、微观结构和耐久性性能进行彻底的检查之后,才能证实这些替代粘合剂的实际可行性。本文综述了七种重要的替代胶凝粘合剂体系,即在某些情况下替代OPC的补充胶凝剂、工业副产物、替代水泥、以垃圾为骨料制成的混凝土、碳表硅酸钙水泥、水合硅酸钙基水泥、硅酸钙基水泥。讨论了蛋壳废弃物作为可持续建筑材料的可行性。据推测,所有最新的胶结粘合剂都可以利用工业废料,如低品位的石灰石或粘土、粉煤灰和炉渣来制造。这将达到理想的物理机械性能和耐用性,同时降低成本和能耗20%至58%。此外,上述替代粘合剂的产生可以减少15-55%的温室气体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
9.10%
发文量
18
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信