OPŠTE DETERMINANTE BOSANSKO-BOŠNJAČKE INTERFERENCIJE / GENERAL DETERMINANTS OF BOSNIAN-BOSNIAK INTERFERENCES

Muedib Šahinović
{"title":"OPŠTE DETERMINANTE BOSANSKO-BOŠNJAČKE INTERFERENCIJE / GENERAL DETERMINANTS OF BOSNIAN-BOSNIAK INTERFERENCES","authors":"Muedib Šahinović","doi":"10.48052/19865244.2023.2.37","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper presents a sociological research of key characteristics, theoretical assumptions and strategic interests of Bosniak politics, which, in a diachronically very limited time, faced complex challenges of preserving its own ethnic identity and simultaneous efforts to strengthen the state role and its political prerogatives. Such challenges generate existential dilemmas about the possible loss of one's own ethnic substance through a process of interference with the identity of the state and its interests. The research is largely focused on the contingent issue of the nation, which is very sensitive in the context of Bosnia and Herzegovina and has the potential to ideologically divide the political spectrum into two completely different concepts (civic and ethnic). The Bosniak connection with Bosnia and the tendency towards a modern Bosnian nation-state that will overcome ethnic differences, divisions and conflicts is becoming a vital political context in which Bosniaks fill the empty space between the state and the nation. Sociological analysis critically investigates the whole process, objectively pointing out some of the mistakes that Bosniak politics has made or can make. The research showed that the Bosnian nation as a political fact does not exist in full capacity because it is burdened by the conflict of Bosniak insistence and, consequently, Serbo-Croat rejection. This fact has its functional repercussions on political perceptions of the status and future of Bosnia and Herzegovina, which for Bosniaks is not just an administrative space or a political agreement of ethnic groups, but above all a homeland. With the intention of more precise analytical research, the paper is based on a qualitative methodological approach and in addition to the usual research methods such as content analysis, synthesis, deduction, induction, generalization and comparison, the research-based interview method was also employed.","PeriodicalId":143585,"journal":{"name":"Pregled: časopis za društvena pitanja / Periodical for social issues","volume":" 31","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pregled: časopis za društvena pitanja / Periodical for social issues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48052/19865244.2023.2.37","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper presents a sociological research of key characteristics, theoretical assumptions and strategic interests of Bosniak politics, which, in a diachronically very limited time, faced complex challenges of preserving its own ethnic identity and simultaneous efforts to strengthen the state role and its political prerogatives. Such challenges generate existential dilemmas about the possible loss of one's own ethnic substance through a process of interference with the identity of the state and its interests. The research is largely focused on the contingent issue of the nation, which is very sensitive in the context of Bosnia and Herzegovina and has the potential to ideologically divide the political spectrum into two completely different concepts (civic and ethnic). The Bosniak connection with Bosnia and the tendency towards a modern Bosnian nation-state that will overcome ethnic differences, divisions and conflicts is becoming a vital political context in which Bosniaks fill the empty space between the state and the nation. Sociological analysis critically investigates the whole process, objectively pointing out some of the mistakes that Bosniak politics has made or can make. The research showed that the Bosnian nation as a political fact does not exist in full capacity because it is burdened by the conflict of Bosniak insistence and, consequently, Serbo-Croat rejection. This fact has its functional repercussions on political perceptions of the status and future of Bosnia and Herzegovina, which for Bosniaks is not just an administrative space or a political agreement of ethnic groups, but above all a homeland. With the intention of more precise analytical research, the paper is based on a qualitative methodological approach and in addition to the usual research methods such as content analysis, synthesis, deduction, induction, generalization and comparison, the research-based interview method was also employed.
opšte determinante bosansko-bošnjačke interferencije / 波斯尼亚-波斯尼亚干扰的一般决定因素
本文对波斯尼亚政治的关键特征、理论假设和战略利益进行了社会学研究。波斯尼亚政治在历史上非常有限的时间内,面临着维护自己的民族身份和同时努力加强国家作用及其政治特权的复杂挑战。这些挑战产生了存在的困境,即通过干涉国家身份及其利益的过程,可能会失去自己的民族实质。研究主要集中在民族的偶发问题上,这个问题在波斯尼亚-黑塞哥维那的背景下非常敏感,有可能在意识形态上将政治光谱分成两个完全不同的概念(公民和种族)。波斯尼亚人与波斯尼亚的联系,以及建立一个克服种族差异、分裂和冲突的现代波斯尼亚民族国家的趋势,正在成为一个至关重要的政治背景,在这个背景下,波斯尼亚人填补了国家与民族之间的空白。社会学分析批判性地调查了整个过程,客观地指出了波斯尼亚政治已经犯下或可能犯下的一些错误。研究表明,波斯尼亚民族作为一个政治事实并没有充分存在,因为它受到波斯尼亚人坚持的冲突的负担,因此受到塞尔维亚-克罗地亚人拒绝的负担。这一事实对波斯尼亚-黑塞哥维那的地位和未来的政治观念产生了功能上的影响,对波斯尼亚人来说,波斯尼亚-黑塞哥维那不仅是一个行政空间或种族群体的政治协议,而且首先是一个家园。为了进行更精确的分析研究,本文采用了定性方法论,除了常用的内容分析、综合、演绎、归纳、概括、比较等研究方法外,还采用了基于研究的访谈法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信