Development of online mediation in Russia and the Republic of Kazakhstan

Nurgul A. Lukmanova, Rimma Sh. Rahmatulina
{"title":"Development of online mediation in Russia and the Republic of Kazakhstan","authors":"Nurgul A. Lukmanova, Rimma Sh. Rahmatulina","doi":"10.52028/rbadr.v5i10.art14.kz","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Taking into account the practical and further legal implementation of alternative dispute resolution methods in the Russian Federation and the Republic of Kazakhstan, the legal community pays attention to the legislative consolidation of the status of mediation technology for dispute resolution, since the rights of citizens and legal entities and extrajudicial forms of protection of interests contribute to the development of social harmony, reducing conflict in society, as well as the development of cooperation relations in the long term. The authors drew attention to the implementation and increasing introduction of online mediation. However, in this regard, neither the Russian Federation nor the Republic of Kazakhstan have developed rules for virtual mediation, there are no regulations for conducting the procedure in the online space. The authors propose to standardize this institution. Today, the use of the mediation institute shows that this mechanism may be necessary as one of the universal ways to resolve conflicts and disputes. When studying the application of the mediation regulations of the two countries, some features and differences were identified, as well as general rules for the use of alternative dispute resolution methods. At the same time, there is no special regulation for virtual dispute resolution in the legislation of the countries under consideration. The authors recommend expanding the scope of virtual mediation in school life, using this institution more widely in intellectual property law and in other legal relations. Despite the fact that in the countries represented, various ways are used to achieve a mutually acceptable solution between the parties in court and out of court, but, as a whole, the institute of mediation and the institute of online mediation need to be expanded and standardized according to certain models, depending on the disputes under consideration","PeriodicalId":101933,"journal":{"name":"REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION","volume":" 45","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52028/rbadr.v5i10.art14.kz","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Taking into account the practical and further legal implementation of alternative dispute resolution methods in the Russian Federation and the Republic of Kazakhstan, the legal community pays attention to the legislative consolidation of the status of mediation technology for dispute resolution, since the rights of citizens and legal entities and extrajudicial forms of protection of interests contribute to the development of social harmony, reducing conflict in society, as well as the development of cooperation relations in the long term. The authors drew attention to the implementation and increasing introduction of online mediation. However, in this regard, neither the Russian Federation nor the Republic of Kazakhstan have developed rules for virtual mediation, there are no regulations for conducting the procedure in the online space. The authors propose to standardize this institution. Today, the use of the mediation institute shows that this mechanism may be necessary as one of the universal ways to resolve conflicts and disputes. When studying the application of the mediation regulations of the two countries, some features and differences were identified, as well as general rules for the use of alternative dispute resolution methods. At the same time, there is no special regulation for virtual dispute resolution in the legislation of the countries under consideration. The authors recommend expanding the scope of virtual mediation in school life, using this institution more widely in intellectual property law and in other legal relations. Despite the fact that in the countries represented, various ways are used to achieve a mutually acceptable solution between the parties in court and out of court, but, as a whole, the institute of mediation and the institute of online mediation need to be expanded and standardized according to certain models, depending on the disputes under consideration
俄罗斯和哈萨克斯坦共和国在线调解的发展情况
考虑到替代性争端解决方法在俄罗斯联邦和哈萨克斯坦共和国的实际和进一步的法律实施,法律界注意在立法上巩固调解技术在解决争端中的地位,因为公民和法人实体的权利以及保护利益的法外形式有助于社会和谐的发展,减少社会冲突。以及发展长期的合作关系。作者提请注意在线调解的实施和越来越多的引入。然而,在这方面,俄罗斯联邦和哈萨克斯坦共和国都没有制定虚拟调解规则,没有在在线空间进行程序的规定。作者建议规范这一制度。今天,调解机构的使用表明,作为解决冲突和纠纷的普遍途径之一,这一机制可能是必要的。在研究两国调解规则的适用时,我们发现了两国调解规则的一些特点和差异,以及替代性争议解决方式使用的一般规则。同时,这些国家的立法中并没有对虚拟争议解决的专门规定。作者建议扩大虚拟调解在学校生活中的范围,在知识产权法和其他法律关系中更广泛地使用这一制度。尽管在所代表的国家,通过各种方式在法院内外达成双方都能接受的解决方案,但是,作为一个整体,调解机构和网络调解机构需要根据所考虑的争议,按照一定的模式进行扩展和规范
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书