Mobile Device Digital Photography for Teledermatology Consultation: Real-Life Situations

Q3 Medicine
S. Bunyaratavej, Pattriya Jirawattanadon, Chudapa Sereeaphinan, Supisara Wongdama, Sanchai Sombatmaithai, C. Leeyaphan
{"title":"Mobile Device Digital Photography for Teledermatology Consultation: Real-Life Situations","authors":"S. Bunyaratavej, Pattriya Jirawattanadon, Chudapa Sereeaphinan, Supisara Wongdama, Sanchai Sombatmaithai, C. Leeyaphan","doi":"10.33192/smj.v75i12.264488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The use of mobile phones for teledermatology consultations is increasing. In this study, we aimed to describe photographic problems in teledermatology performed via mobile phones and their effects on diagnostic decision-making.\nMaterials and Methods: Three dermatologists independently reviewed the medical histories and photographs of patients taken by primary-care physicians for teledermatology between January 2018 and August 2020. The consensus of the dermatologists’ decision-making was categorized into “definite diagnoses given,” “probable diagnoses given,” and “unable to provide any diagnosis.” Relationships between photographic errors and dermatologist decision-making were investigated. Factors related to photographic problems were evaluated.\nResults: In all, 899 images from 220 patients were reviewed. The most common purpose of teledermatology was to make a diagnosis. The most frequent diagnoses were eczema, infection, and autoimmune diseases. Consultants gave definite diagnoses for 63.2% of patients and probable diagnoses for another 29.5%. However, diagnoses were not made in 7.3% of cases. Defocusing and non-eczematous lesions were significantly associated with the inability to give diagnoses (P = 0.002 and 0.037, respectively). Pictures from peripheral areas showed higher frequencies of distortion errors, improper framing, wasted space, and improper background, while truncal regions tended to have lighting problems. The outpatient department setting was associated with a lack of overview and defocusing.\nConclusion: Focusing was the central factor for making diagnoses in teledermatology. Lighting should be more concerned in truncal regions. While using smartphone cameras, distortion should be aware. These factors should be considered to improve the effectiveness of teledermatology.","PeriodicalId":37270,"journal":{"name":"Siriraj Medical Journal","volume":" 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Siriraj Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33192/smj.v75i12.264488","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The use of mobile phones for teledermatology consultations is increasing. In this study, we aimed to describe photographic problems in teledermatology performed via mobile phones and their effects on diagnostic decision-making. Materials and Methods: Three dermatologists independently reviewed the medical histories and photographs of patients taken by primary-care physicians for teledermatology between January 2018 and August 2020. The consensus of the dermatologists’ decision-making was categorized into “definite diagnoses given,” “probable diagnoses given,” and “unable to provide any diagnosis.” Relationships between photographic errors and dermatologist decision-making were investigated. Factors related to photographic problems were evaluated. Results: In all, 899 images from 220 patients were reviewed. The most common purpose of teledermatology was to make a diagnosis. The most frequent diagnoses were eczema, infection, and autoimmune diseases. Consultants gave definite diagnoses for 63.2% of patients and probable diagnoses for another 29.5%. However, diagnoses were not made in 7.3% of cases. Defocusing and non-eczematous lesions were significantly associated with the inability to give diagnoses (P = 0.002 and 0.037, respectively). Pictures from peripheral areas showed higher frequencies of distortion errors, improper framing, wasted space, and improper background, while truncal regions tended to have lighting problems. The outpatient department setting was associated with a lack of overview and defocusing. Conclusion: Focusing was the central factor for making diagnoses in teledermatology. Lighting should be more concerned in truncal regions. While using smartphone cameras, distortion should be aware. These factors should be considered to improve the effectiveness of teledermatology.
用于远程皮肤科咨询的移动设备数码摄影:真实场景
目的:手机在皮肤科远程会诊中的应用日益增多。在本研究中,我们旨在描述通过移动电话进行的远程皮肤科摄影问题及其对诊断决策的影响。材料与方法:三位皮肤科医生独立审查了2018年1月至2020年8月期间由初级保健医生为远程皮肤病学拍摄的患者的病史和照片。皮肤科医生的决策共识分为“给出明确的诊断”、“给出可能的诊断”和“无法提供任何诊断”。研究了摄影误差与皮肤科医生决策之间的关系。评估与摄影问题相关的因素。结果:共回顾220例患者的899张图像。远程皮肤科最常见的目的是进行诊断。最常见的诊断是湿疹、感染和自身免疫性疾病。63.2%的患者给出明确诊断,29.5%的患者给出可能诊断。然而,7.3%的病例没有得到诊断。散焦和非湿疹性病变与无法诊断显著相关(P值分别为0.002和0.037)。外围区域的照片出现失真错误、取景不当、空间浪费和背景不当的频率更高,而躯干区域则容易出现照明问题。门诊设置与缺乏概述和散焦有关。结论:聚焦是远程皮肤科诊断的核心因素。照明应更多地关注在躯干区域。在使用智能手机相机时,要注意失真。要提高远程皮肤科的疗效,应综合考虑这些因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Siriraj Medical Journal
Siriraj Medical Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信