Social Impact Measurement: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Directions

WORLD Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI:10.3390/world4040051
Leah Feor, Amelia Clarke, Ilona Dougherty
{"title":"Social Impact Measurement: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Directions","authors":"Leah Feor, Amelia Clarke, Ilona Dougherty","doi":"10.3390/world4040051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper explores the current state of the social impact measurement (SIM) field to better understand common practices in measuring the post-intervention social impact of a program or project and to identify strategies to improve measurement in practice. This study employed a systematic literature review. Articles were manually coded deductively and inductively in NVivo to complete a descriptive and thematic analysis of the literature. The thematic analysis provided an in-depth understanding of the SIM field. We found that similarities existed across the definitions of social impact (e.g., environmental impact is part of social impact). Additionally, social return on investment (SROI) is the most common measurement model and theory of change was identified as a core concept across SIM literature. Strategies are presented for practitioners to consider when measuring social impact, including: (i) engage stakeholders throughout the process, (ii) mobilize existing operational data, (iii) increase measurement capacity, and (iv) use both qualitative and quantitative data. This study reveals the nuances of SIM based on academic literature published across the globe over the span of a decade. It places emphasis on the post-intervention stage and identifies strategies to improve the application of measurement models in practice. Lastly, it outlines future research directions.","PeriodicalId":23705,"journal":{"name":"WORLD","volume":" 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WORLD","FirstCategoryId":"1092","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/world4040051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper explores the current state of the social impact measurement (SIM) field to better understand common practices in measuring the post-intervention social impact of a program or project and to identify strategies to improve measurement in practice. This study employed a systematic literature review. Articles were manually coded deductively and inductively in NVivo to complete a descriptive and thematic analysis of the literature. The thematic analysis provided an in-depth understanding of the SIM field. We found that similarities existed across the definitions of social impact (e.g., environmental impact is part of social impact). Additionally, social return on investment (SROI) is the most common measurement model and theory of change was identified as a core concept across SIM literature. Strategies are presented for practitioners to consider when measuring social impact, including: (i) engage stakeholders throughout the process, (ii) mobilize existing operational data, (iii) increase measurement capacity, and (iv) use both qualitative and quantitative data. This study reveals the nuances of SIM based on academic literature published across the globe over the span of a decade. It places emphasis on the post-intervention stage and identifies strategies to improve the application of measurement models in practice. Lastly, it outlines future research directions.
社会影响测量:系统文献综述与未来研究方向
本文探讨了社会影响测量(SIM)领域的现状,以更好地了解测量一个计划或项目的干预后社会影响的常见做法,并确定在实践中改进测量的策略。本研究采用系统的文献回顾法。文章在NVivo中进行演绎和归纳编码,以完成文献的描述性和主题性分析。专题分析提供了对SIM领域的深入了解。我们发现社会影响的定义存在相似性(例如,环境影响是社会影响的一部分)。此外,社会投资回报率(SROI)是最常见的测量模型,变革理论被确定为SIM文献中的核心概念。在衡量社会影响时,提出了供从业者考虑的策略,包括:(i)在整个过程中吸引利益相关者,(ii)调动现有的操作数据,(iii)增加测量能力,以及(iv)同时使用定性和定量数据。本研究基于十年来全球发表的学术文献揭示了SIM的细微差别。它将重点放在干预后阶段,并确定在实践中改进测量模型应用的策略。最后,展望了未来的研究方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信