Fine art as an integral part of architecture: Political and social aspects of the formation of this synthesis in the 20th century

P. Mazalán, Katarína Morávková
{"title":"Fine art as an integral part of architecture: Political and social aspects of the formation of this synthesis in the 20th century","authors":"P. Mazalán, Katarína Morávková","doi":"10.2478/alfa-2023-0022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The theme of the connection of visual arts with architecture, or the cooperation of visual artists with architects in post-war Europe, basically follows two lines: a theoretical line and a political-institutional line. Just as knowledge of the history of art and the history of architecture is necessary in the analysis of this period, knowledge of the political-economic circumstances is necessary in the field of realisations in architecture, because by definition, this public art is a political affair and is not an independent creation. Art in architecture was promoted not only in communist countries (for ideological reasons), but also in Western Europe as an aesthetic cultivation of contemporary architecture. From the mid-1950s onwards, visual art in architectural space appeared more and more frequently, which led to the adoption of legislative measures that regulated and supported this practice. A gradual transformation in the understanding of the task can be observed over the period under review, or the position of public art, presented as part of architecture or public space. This is naturally due to social development. If at the beginning of the 1950s it was a mission to convey ideology and indoctrinate it, in the next stage the focus shifts more towards design with the task of cultivating the environment and creating a certain atmosphere. The study also peripherally explores forms of arts support in the context of other European countries. The idea of integration between art and architecture dates back to the very origins of both disciplines. During the avant-garde movement at the beginning of the twentieth century, it acquired a new meaning and social purpose and became one of the most defining characteristics of modernism. Modernism arose from the expectation of moral and material reconstruction of the world devastated by war, which served as a tool to strengthen collective identity and, consequently, to forge the bond between the city and its inhabitants. Our study traces the development and contexts of the relationship and funding of visual arts in architecture in the Slovak and European context in the 20th century.","PeriodicalId":374370,"journal":{"name":"Architecture Papers of the Faculty of Architecture and Design STU","volume":" 27","pages":"24 - 28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Architecture Papers of the Faculty of Architecture and Design STU","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/alfa-2023-0022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The theme of the connection of visual arts with architecture, or the cooperation of visual artists with architects in post-war Europe, basically follows two lines: a theoretical line and a political-institutional line. Just as knowledge of the history of art and the history of architecture is necessary in the analysis of this period, knowledge of the political-economic circumstances is necessary in the field of realisations in architecture, because by definition, this public art is a political affair and is not an independent creation. Art in architecture was promoted not only in communist countries (for ideological reasons), but also in Western Europe as an aesthetic cultivation of contemporary architecture. From the mid-1950s onwards, visual art in architectural space appeared more and more frequently, which led to the adoption of legislative measures that regulated and supported this practice. A gradual transformation in the understanding of the task can be observed over the period under review, or the position of public art, presented as part of architecture or public space. This is naturally due to social development. If at the beginning of the 1950s it was a mission to convey ideology and indoctrinate it, in the next stage the focus shifts more towards design with the task of cultivating the environment and creating a certain atmosphere. The study also peripherally explores forms of arts support in the context of other European countries. The idea of integration between art and architecture dates back to the very origins of both disciplines. During the avant-garde movement at the beginning of the twentieth century, it acquired a new meaning and social purpose and became one of the most defining characteristics of modernism. Modernism arose from the expectation of moral and material reconstruction of the world devastated by war, which served as a tool to strengthen collective identity and, consequently, to forge the bond between the city and its inhabitants. Our study traces the development and contexts of the relationship and funding of visual arts in architecture in the Slovak and European context in the 20th century.
美术是建筑的组成部分:20 世纪形成这一综合体的政治和社会因素
视觉艺术与建筑的联系,或者说战后欧洲视觉艺术家与建筑师的合作,这个主题基本上遵循两条线:一条理论线和一条政治-制度线。正如艺术史和建筑史的知识在分析这一时期是必要的一样,政治经济环境的知识在建筑实现领域是必要的,因为根据定义,这种公共艺术是一种政治事务,而不是一种独立的创作。建筑艺术不仅在共产主义国家(出于意识形态的原因)得到推广,而且在西欧作为当代建筑的审美培养。从20世纪50年代中期开始,视觉艺术在建筑空间中的出现越来越频繁,这导致了立法措施的出台,以规范和支持这种做法。在回顾期间,可以观察到对任务的理解的逐渐转变,或者公共艺术的地位,作为建筑或公共空间的一部分呈现。这是社会发展的必然结果。如果在20世纪50年代初,它的使命是传达意识形态和灌输思想,那么在下一阶段,重点将更多地转向设计,任务是培养环境和创造某种氛围。该研究还对其他欧洲国家背景下的艺术支持形式进行了初步探讨。艺术和建筑之间的融合可以追溯到这两个学科的起源。在二十世纪初的前卫运动中,它获得了新的意义和社会目的,成为现代主义最具代表性的特征之一。现代主义源于对被战争摧毁的世界的道德和物质重建的期望,这是加强集体认同的工具,因此,建立了城市与其居民之间的联系。我们的研究追溯了20世纪斯洛伐克和欧洲背景下视觉艺术在建筑中的关系和资金的发展和背景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信