Competition and co-association, but not phosphorous availability, shape the benefits of phosphate-solubilizing root bacteria for maize (Zea mays)

J. Williamson, Andrew C. Matthews, Ben Raymond
{"title":"Competition and co-association, but not phosphorous availability, shape the benefits of phosphate-solubilizing root bacteria for maize (Zea mays)","authors":"J. Williamson, Andrew C. Matthews, Ben Raymond","doi":"10.1099/acmi.0.000543.v3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Predicting the conditions under which rhizobacteria benefit plant growth remains challenging. Here we tested the hypothesis that benefits from inoculation with phosphate-solubilizing rhizobacteria will depend upon two environmental conditions: phosphate availability and competition between bacteria. We used maize-associated rhizobacteria with varying phosphate solubilization ability in experiments in soil, sterilized soil and gnotobiotic microcosms under conditions of varying orthophosphate availability, while we manipulated the intensity of competition by varying the number of isolates in plant inocula. Growth promotion by microbes did not depend on phosphate availability but was affected by interactions between inoculants: the beneficial effects of one \n \n Serratia\n \n isolate were only detectable when plants were inoculated with a single strain and the beneficial effects of a competition-sensitive \n \n Rhizobium\n \n was only detectable in sterilized soil or in microcosms inoculated with single strains. Moreover, microcosm experiments suggested that facilitation of a parasitic isolate, not competitive interactions between bacteria, prevented plants from gaining benefits from a potential mutualist. Competition and facilitation affected colonization of plants in microcosms but growth promotion by \n \n Serratia\n \n was more affected by inoculation treatment than culturable densities on roots. Experimental manipulation of seed inocula can reveal whether plant growth stimulation is robust with respect to competition, as well as the ecological strategies of different rhizobacteria. From an applied perspective, phosphate solubilization may not provide the mechanism for bacterial growth promotion but may indicate mutualistic potential due to phylogenetic associations. Importantly, benefits to plants are vulnerable to interactions between rhizobacteria and may not persist in mixed inoculations.","PeriodicalId":6956,"journal":{"name":"Access Microbiology","volume":" 83","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Access Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1099/acmi.0.000543.v3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Predicting the conditions under which rhizobacteria benefit plant growth remains challenging. Here we tested the hypothesis that benefits from inoculation with phosphate-solubilizing rhizobacteria will depend upon two environmental conditions: phosphate availability and competition between bacteria. We used maize-associated rhizobacteria with varying phosphate solubilization ability in experiments in soil, sterilized soil and gnotobiotic microcosms under conditions of varying orthophosphate availability, while we manipulated the intensity of competition by varying the number of isolates in plant inocula. Growth promotion by microbes did not depend on phosphate availability but was affected by interactions between inoculants: the beneficial effects of one Serratia isolate were only detectable when plants were inoculated with a single strain and the beneficial effects of a competition-sensitive Rhizobium was only detectable in sterilized soil or in microcosms inoculated with single strains. Moreover, microcosm experiments suggested that facilitation of a parasitic isolate, not competitive interactions between bacteria, prevented plants from gaining benefits from a potential mutualist. Competition and facilitation affected colonization of plants in microcosms but growth promotion by Serratia was more affected by inoculation treatment than culturable densities on roots. Experimental manipulation of seed inocula can reveal whether plant growth stimulation is robust with respect to competition, as well as the ecological strategies of different rhizobacteria. From an applied perspective, phosphate solubilization may not provide the mechanism for bacterial growth promotion but may indicate mutualistic potential due to phylogenetic associations. Importantly, benefits to plants are vulnerable to interactions between rhizobacteria and may not persist in mixed inoculations.
竞争和共生,而非磷的供应,决定了磷酸盐溶解根细菌对玉米(玉米)的益处
预测根菌有利于植物生长的条件仍然具有挑战性。在这里,我们验证了这样一个假设,即接种可溶解磷酸盐的根细菌的益处取决于两个环境条件:磷酸盐的可用性和细菌之间的竞争。在土壤、无菌土壤和微生物环境中,我们使用具有不同磷酸盐溶解能力的玉米相关根瘤菌,在不同正磷酸盐有效性的条件下进行了实验,同时我们通过改变植物接种物中的分离菌数量来操纵竞争强度。微生物对生长的促进并不依赖于磷酸盐的有效性,而是受到接种剂之间相互作用的影响:只有在用单一菌株接种植物时才能检测到一种沙雷菌分离物的有益效果,而对竞争敏感的根瘤菌的有益效果只有在无菌土壤或用单一菌株接种的微生物中才能检测到。此外,微观实验表明,寄生分离物的促进作用,而不是细菌之间的竞争性相互作用,阻止了植物从潜在的共生者那里获得利益。在微观环境中,竞争和促进作用影响植物的定植,但接种处理对沙雷氏菌生长的促进作用比对根系可培养密度的影响更大。实验操作种子接种可以揭示植物生长刺激在竞争方面是否稳健,以及不同根瘤菌的生态策略。从应用的角度来看,磷酸盐增溶可能不能提供促进细菌生长的机制,但可能表明由于系统发育关联而具有相互作用的潜力。重要的是,对植物的益处容易受到根细菌之间相互作用的影响,并且在混合接种中可能无法持续。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信