Assessing the countries’ convergence to IPSAS from a cultural perspective

Paula Gomes dos Santos, Fábio Albuquerque
{"title":"Assessing the countries’ convergence to IPSAS from a cultural perspective","authors":"Paula Gomes dos Santos, Fábio Albuquerque","doi":"10.1108/ijaim-02-2023-0047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to assess the factors that may explain the International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSAS) convergence, considering Hofstede’s cultural dimensions as the theoretical reference for the cultural approach proposed. Additional factors include countries’ contextual and macroeconomic characteristics.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nLogistic and probit regression models were used to identify the factors that may explain the IPSAS (fully or adapted) use by countries, including 166 countries in this assessment (59 for those whose cultural dimensions are available).\n\n\nFindings\nThe findings consistently indicate collectivism and indebtedness levels as explanatory factors, providing insights into cultural dimensions along with macroeconomic characteristics as a relevant factor of countries’ convergence to IPSAS.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThere are different levels of IPSAS convergence by countries that were not considered. This aspect may hide different countries’ characteristics that may explain those options, which could not be distinguished in this paper.\n\n\nPractical implications\nAs a result of this paper, the International Public Sector Accounting Standards Board may gain insights that can be applied within the IPSAS due process to overcome the main challenges when collaborating with national authorities to achieve a high level of convergence. This analysis may include how to accommodate countries’ cultural differences as well as their contextual and macroeconomic characteristics.\n\n\nSocial implications\nThere is a trend of moving toward accrual-based accounting standards by countries. Because the public sector embraces a new culture following the IPSAS path, it is relevant to assess if there are cultural factors, besides contextual and macroeconomic characteristics, that may explain the countries’ convergence to those standards.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first cross-country analysis on the likely influence of cultural dimensions on IPSAS convergence as far as the authors’ knowledge.\n","PeriodicalId":229587,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Accounting & Information Management","volume":"2 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Accounting & Information Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijaim-02-2023-0047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to assess the factors that may explain the International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSAS) convergence, considering Hofstede’s cultural dimensions as the theoretical reference for the cultural approach proposed. Additional factors include countries’ contextual and macroeconomic characteristics. Design/methodology/approach Logistic and probit regression models were used to identify the factors that may explain the IPSAS (fully or adapted) use by countries, including 166 countries in this assessment (59 for those whose cultural dimensions are available). Findings The findings consistently indicate collectivism and indebtedness levels as explanatory factors, providing insights into cultural dimensions along with macroeconomic characteristics as a relevant factor of countries’ convergence to IPSAS. Research limitations/implications There are different levels of IPSAS convergence by countries that were not considered. This aspect may hide different countries’ characteristics that may explain those options, which could not be distinguished in this paper. Practical implications As a result of this paper, the International Public Sector Accounting Standards Board may gain insights that can be applied within the IPSAS due process to overcome the main challenges when collaborating with national authorities to achieve a high level of convergence. This analysis may include how to accommodate countries’ cultural differences as well as their contextual and macroeconomic characteristics. Social implications There is a trend of moving toward accrual-based accounting standards by countries. Because the public sector embraces a new culture following the IPSAS path, it is relevant to assess if there are cultural factors, besides contextual and macroeconomic characteristics, that may explain the countries’ convergence to those standards. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first cross-country analysis on the likely influence of cultural dimensions on IPSAS convergence as far as the authors’ knowledge.
从文化角度评估各国向《国际公共部门会计标准》靠拢的情况
本文旨在评估可能解释国际公共部门会计准则(IPSAS)趋同的因素,将Hofstede的文化维度作为所提出的文化方法的理论参考。其他因素包括各国的环境和宏观经济特征。设计/方法/方法使用逻辑和概率回归模型来确定可能解释各国(完全或改编)使用公共部门会计准则的因素,包括本次评估中的166个国家(其中59个国家的文化维度可用)。研究结果一致表明,集体主义和负债水平是解释性因素,提供了对文化维度的见解,以及宏观经济特征作为各国向公共部门会计准则趋同的相关因素。研究限制/影响未考虑的国家的公共部门会计准则趋同程度不同。这一方面可能隐藏了不同国家的特征,这些特征可以解释这些选择,这在本文中无法区分。作为本文的一项成果,国际公共部门会计准则理事会可能会获得可应用于国际公共部门会计准则正当程序的见解,以克服与国家主管部门合作以实现高水平趋同时面临的主要挑战。这种分析可能包括如何适应各国的文化差异以及它们的背景和宏观经济特征。社会影响各国有向权责发生制会计准则发展的趋势。由于公共部门遵循公共部门会计准则的道路接受了一种新的文化,因此,除了环境和宏观经济特征之外,评估是否存在文化因素可以解释各国向这些标准趋同,这是相关的。原创性/价值据作者所知,就作者所知,这是第一次对文化维度对公共部门会计准则趋同可能产生的影响进行跨国分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信