Supersonic Flow over Elliptic Cone with Different Ellipticity Ratio

IF 1.1 4区 工程技术 Q4 MECHANICS
†. V.Kotebavi, S. G. Rakesh
{"title":"Supersonic Flow over Elliptic Cone with Different Ellipticity Ratio","authors":"†. V.Kotebavi, S. G. Rakesh","doi":"10.47176/jafm.16.12.1865","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates supersonic flow characteristics over circular and elliptic cones at various angles of attack. Simulations were conducted on the cones with the same base area and length-to-diameter ratio. The elliptic cones considered had axis ratios of 1.5 and 3. The angle of attack varied from 0o to 50o, with two different Mach numbers (1.97 and 2.94) employed for the analysis. The numerical results were compared with the experimental and theoretical findings from existing literature. The results revealed that increasing the ellipticity ratio of the cones resulted in higher lift generation. The pressure distributions on the windward and leeward sides of the cones were also examined. The results demonstrated that elliptic cones outperformed circular cones in terms of lift production, and this advantage increased with higher ellipticity ratios. Specifically, when the ellipticity ratio was increased from 1 to 3, the maximum increase in lift coefficient was 96% and 100% at Mach numbers 2.94 and 1.97, respectively. Additionally, by changing the ellipticity ratio from 1 to 1.5, the maximum gain in the lift-drag ratio was 16% and 22% at Mach numbers 1.97 and 2.94, respectively. Notably, an elliptic cone with an ellipticity ratio of 3 achieved a remarkable 46% gain in lift-to-drag ratio compared to a circular cone. However, as the angle of attack increased, a primary bow shock formed on the windward side of the cone, with an embedded shock appearing on the leeward side.","PeriodicalId":49041,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Fluid Mechanics","volume":" 783","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Fluid Mechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47176/jafm.16.12.1865","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates supersonic flow characteristics over circular and elliptic cones at various angles of attack. Simulations were conducted on the cones with the same base area and length-to-diameter ratio. The elliptic cones considered had axis ratios of 1.5 and 3. The angle of attack varied from 0o to 50o, with two different Mach numbers (1.97 and 2.94) employed for the analysis. The numerical results were compared with the experimental and theoretical findings from existing literature. The results revealed that increasing the ellipticity ratio of the cones resulted in higher lift generation. The pressure distributions on the windward and leeward sides of the cones were also examined. The results demonstrated that elliptic cones outperformed circular cones in terms of lift production, and this advantage increased with higher ellipticity ratios. Specifically, when the ellipticity ratio was increased from 1 to 3, the maximum increase in lift coefficient was 96% and 100% at Mach numbers 2.94 and 1.97, respectively. Additionally, by changing the ellipticity ratio from 1 to 1.5, the maximum gain in the lift-drag ratio was 16% and 22% at Mach numbers 1.97 and 2.94, respectively. Notably, an elliptic cone with an ellipticity ratio of 3 achieved a remarkable 46% gain in lift-to-drag ratio compared to a circular cone. However, as the angle of attack increased, a primary bow shock formed on the windward side of the cone, with an embedded shock appearing on the leeward side.
不同椭圆率的椭圆锥上的超音速流
本文研究了不同迎角下圆形锥和椭圆锥的超音速流动特性。对相同基底面积和长径比的锥体进行了模拟。所考虑的椭圆锥轴比分别为1.5和3。攻角在00 ~ 500度范围内变化,分析采用了两种不同的马赫数(1.97和2.94)。数值结果与已有文献的实验和理论结果进行了比较。结果表明,增大锥体的椭圆率,产生的升力增大。研究了锥体迎风面和背风面的压力分布。结果表明,椭圆锥在举升产量方面优于圆形锥,并且随着椭圆比的增加,这种优势会增加。其中,当椭圆比从1增加到3时,在马赫数2.94和1.97时,升力系数的最大增幅分别为96%和100%。当椭圆率为1 ~ 1.5时,在马赫数为1.97和2.94时,升阻比的最大增益分别为16%和22%。值得注意的是,椭圆度比为3的椭圆锥与圆锥相比,升阻比提高了46%。然而,随着迎角的增加,在锥的迎风侧形成了初级艏激波,在背风侧出现了嵌入激波。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Fluid Mechanics
Journal of Applied Fluid Mechanics THERMODYNAMICS-MECHANICS
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
138
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Applied Fluid Mechanics (JAFM) is an international, peer-reviewed journal which covers a wide range of theoretical, numerical and experimental aspects in fluid mechanics. The emphasis is on the applications in different engineering fields rather than on pure mathematical or physical aspects in fluid mechanics. Although many high quality journals pertaining to different aspects of fluid mechanics presently exist, research in the field is rapidly escalating. The motivation for this new fluid mechanics journal is driven by the following points: (1) there is a need to have an e-journal accessible to all fluid mechanics researchers, (2) scientists from third- world countries need a venue that does not incur publication costs, (3) quality papers deserve rapid and fast publication through an efficient peer review process, and (4) an outlet is needed for rapid dissemination of fluid mechanics conferences held in Asian countries. Pertaining to this latter point, there presently exist some excellent conferences devoted to the promotion of fluid mechanics in the region such as the Asian Congress of Fluid Mechanics which began in 1980 and nominally takes place in one of the Asian countries every two years. We hope that the proposed journal provides and additional impetus for promoting applied fluids research and associated activities in this continent. The journal is under the umbrella of the Physics Society of Iran with the collaboration of Isfahan University of Technology (IUT) .
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信