An experimental study on the sulfuric acid resistance of mineral additive mortars

IF 1.3 4区 材料科学 Q4 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Cebrail Kaplan, Behçet Dündar, Emriye Çınar Resuloğulları
{"title":"An experimental study on the sulfuric acid resistance of mineral additive mortars","authors":"Cebrail Kaplan, Behçet Dündar, Emriye Çınar Resuloğulları","doi":"10.1680/jemmr.23.00001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mineral additives are preferred to improve the physical, mechanical and durability properties of cement-based composites and to reduce the use of cement in order to prevent environmental pollution and high production costs. Within the scope of this study, a new pozzolanic material, Ground Profillite Powder (GPP), was evaluated by comparing it with Granular Ground Blast Furnace Slag (GGBFS), and it was used as a substitution with cement at rates of 5%, 10% and 15% by weight. The effects of these two mineral additives on the mechanical and physical properties of mortars and their resistance to Sulfuric Acid (SA) were investigated. In the production of the mortar samples, CEM I 42.5/R type Portland Cement (OPC) was used as the binder, and 0-4 mm crushed sand was used as the aggregate. Mineral additive and non-additive mortars produced in the laboratory environment in dimensions of 40x40x160 mm; spreading values, bending and compressive strengths, water absorption and porosity values and weight and strength loss values under the effect of SA were examined comparatively. It was determined that the mortar samples produced using GPP showed higher resistance to SA attacks than the pure and GGBFS added mortars, reducing weight losses up to 21% and compressive strength losses up to 30%.","PeriodicalId":11537,"journal":{"name":"Emerging Materials Research","volume":"121 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emerging Materials Research","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1680/jemmr.23.00001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mineral additives are preferred to improve the physical, mechanical and durability properties of cement-based composites and to reduce the use of cement in order to prevent environmental pollution and high production costs. Within the scope of this study, a new pozzolanic material, Ground Profillite Powder (GPP), was evaluated by comparing it with Granular Ground Blast Furnace Slag (GGBFS), and it was used as a substitution with cement at rates of 5%, 10% and 15% by weight. The effects of these two mineral additives on the mechanical and physical properties of mortars and their resistance to Sulfuric Acid (SA) were investigated. In the production of the mortar samples, CEM I 42.5/R type Portland Cement (OPC) was used as the binder, and 0-4 mm crushed sand was used as the aggregate. Mineral additive and non-additive mortars produced in the laboratory environment in dimensions of 40x40x160 mm; spreading values, bending and compressive strengths, water absorption and porosity values and weight and strength loss values under the effect of SA were examined comparatively. It was determined that the mortar samples produced using GPP showed higher resistance to SA attacks than the pure and GGBFS added mortars, reducing weight losses up to 21% and compressive strength losses up to 30%.
矿物添加剂砂浆耐硫酸性能的实验研究
为了改善水泥基复合材料的物理、机械和耐久性,减少水泥的使用,防止环境污染和生产成本高,矿物添加剂是首选。在本研究范围内,通过将一种新型火山灰材料——磨碎型铝粉(GPP)与颗粒状磨碎高炉渣(GGBFS)进行比较,对其进行了评价,并以5%、10%和15%的重量比例替代水泥。研究了这两种矿物添加剂对砂浆力学、物理性能及抗硫酸性能的影响。在砂浆样品的制作中,采用CEM I 42.5/R型波特兰水泥(OPC)作为粘结剂,0-4 mm碎砂作为骨料。实验室环境下生产的尺寸为40x40x160 mm的矿物添加剂和非添加剂砂浆;对SA作用下的拉伸值、弯曲强度和抗压强度、吸水率和孔隙率以及重量和强度损失值进行了比较研究。经测定,使用GPP生产的砂浆样品比纯和添加GGBFS的砂浆具有更高的抗SA攻击能力,可减少高达21%的重量损失和高达30%的抗压强度损失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Emerging Materials Research
Emerging Materials Research MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
62
期刊介绍: Materials Research is constantly evolving and correlations between process, structure, properties and performance which are application specific require expert understanding at the macro-, micro- and nano-scale. The ability to intelligently manipulate material properties and tailor them for desired applications is of constant interest and challenge within universities, national labs and industry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信