Systematic Literature Review on the Perceptions of Teachers of STEM Integration

John Michael Guerzon, S. Busbus
{"title":"Systematic Literature Review on the Perceptions of Teachers of STEM Integration","authors":"John Michael Guerzon, S. Busbus","doi":"10.58249/sjse.v3i02.115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Low academic performance of students has always been a challenge in science and mathematics education despite the introduction of different constructivist approaches, like STEM integration, to promote student learning. The beliefs and perceptions of teachers about a certain approach were believed to shape curriculum implementation. This necessitates a review of the perceptions of teachers of STEM integration. PRISMA 27-item components of reporting systematic literature review were employed to extract patterns relevant to the benefits, challenges, and recommendations identified by K-12 teachers. From n=721, only five research articles were left for final review after a four-phase screening process. Teachers generally view STEM integration as promoting student achievement (problem-solving skills) and motivation or interest. There is an emerging view that science integration in mathematics instruction is stronger than mathematics integration in science instruction. Interestingly, a misperception was identified about technology education integration. This implies incorporation of STEM integration concepts in the undergraduate curriculum as teacher preparation was identified as one of the main problems on which improvements may be focused. The lack of equipment to support technology education integration as well as the appropriate skills needed to deliver the lesson was another emerging theme. In turn, the need for upskilling programmes to support the teachers in delivering 21st-century learning approaches is emphasised. Content knowledge is a prerequisite to pedagogical knowledge. To implement STEM integration, teachers need to know the contents of the different disciplines integrated.","PeriodicalId":471386,"journal":{"name":"SEAQIS Journal of Science Education","volume":"111 39","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SEAQIS Journal of Science Education","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58249/sjse.v3i02.115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Low academic performance of students has always been a challenge in science and mathematics education despite the introduction of different constructivist approaches, like STEM integration, to promote student learning. The beliefs and perceptions of teachers about a certain approach were believed to shape curriculum implementation. This necessitates a review of the perceptions of teachers of STEM integration. PRISMA 27-item components of reporting systematic literature review were employed to extract patterns relevant to the benefits, challenges, and recommendations identified by K-12 teachers. From n=721, only five research articles were left for final review after a four-phase screening process. Teachers generally view STEM integration as promoting student achievement (problem-solving skills) and motivation or interest. There is an emerging view that science integration in mathematics instruction is stronger than mathematics integration in science instruction. Interestingly, a misperception was identified about technology education integration. This implies incorporation of STEM integration concepts in the undergraduate curriculum as teacher preparation was identified as one of the main problems on which improvements may be focused. The lack of equipment to support technology education integration as well as the appropriate skills needed to deliver the lesson was another emerging theme. In turn, the need for upskilling programmes to support the teachers in delivering 21st-century learning approaches is emphasised. Content knowledge is a prerequisite to pedagogical knowledge. To implement STEM integration, teachers need to know the contents of the different disciplines integrated.
关于教师对 STEM 整合的看法的系统性文献综述
尽管引入了不同的建构主义方法,如STEM整合,以促进学生的学习,但学生的学习成绩低一直是科学和数学教育的一个挑战。教师对某种方法的信念和看法被认为会影响课程的实施。这就需要重新审视教师对STEM整合的看法。采用报告系统文献综述的PRISMA 27个项目组成部分来提取与K-12教师确定的利益,挑战和建议相关的模式。从n=721开始,经过四个阶段的筛选过程,只剩下5篇研究论文进行最终审查。教师通常认为STEM整合可以提高学生的成绩(解决问题的能力)和动力或兴趣。数学教学中的科学整合强于科学教学中的数学整合。有趣的是,人们对技术教育整合存在误解。这意味着将STEM整合概念纳入本科课程,因为教师准备被确定为可能重点改进的主要问题之一。缺乏支持技术教育一体化的设备以及提供课程所需的适当技能是另一个新出现的主题。此外,还强调了提高技能项目的必要性,以支持教师传授21世纪的学习方法。内容知识是教学知识的前提。要实施STEM整合,教师需要了解不同学科整合的内容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信