Higher Order Partial Least Squares Path Modeling Using Binary Data: An Application on Multidimensional Poverty and Social Protection in East Java Province

Rudi Salam, I. Sumertajaya, Hari Wijayanto, Anang Kurnia, Timbang Sirait
{"title":"Higher Order Partial Least Squares Path Modeling Using Binary Data: An Application on Multidimensional Poverty and Social Protection in East Java Province","authors":"Rudi Salam, I. Sumertajaya, Hari Wijayanto, Anang Kurnia, Timbang Sirait","doi":"10.56557/ajomcor/2023/v30i48458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The standard partial least squares path modeling (PLS-PM) estimation process assumes the observed data as continuous variables. With slight modifications, this estimation algorithm can be used for data on a binary scale and even for more complex models such as higher order constructs. This study aims to determine by simulation and application of real data the performance of the higher-order construct modeling approach, which of the repeated indicator and two-stage approaches provides better results. From simulation study it was found that the repeated indicator approach with binary data (BinPLS) was better than the two-stage approach. Empirical results also show that the BinPLS measurement model with the repeated indicator approach is better than standard PLS. Evaluation of the structural model also shows that BinPLS with a repeated indicator approach is the best because it produces path coefficients and the power to explain multidimensional poverty and social protection models that are better than BinPLS with a two-stage approach and standard PLS.","PeriodicalId":200824,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Mathematics and Computer Research","volume":"52 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Mathematics and Computer Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56557/ajomcor/2023/v30i48458","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The standard partial least squares path modeling (PLS-PM) estimation process assumes the observed data as continuous variables. With slight modifications, this estimation algorithm can be used for data on a binary scale and even for more complex models such as higher order constructs. This study aims to determine by simulation and application of real data the performance of the higher-order construct modeling approach, which of the repeated indicator and two-stage approaches provides better results. From simulation study it was found that the repeated indicator approach with binary data (BinPLS) was better than the two-stage approach. Empirical results also show that the BinPLS measurement model with the repeated indicator approach is better than standard PLS. Evaluation of the structural model also shows that BinPLS with a repeated indicator approach is the best because it produces path coefficients and the power to explain multidimensional poverty and social protection models that are better than BinPLS with a two-stage approach and standard PLS.
使用二元数据的高阶偏最小二乘法路径模型:东爪哇省多维贫困与社会保护的应用
标准偏最小二乘路径建模(PLS-PM)估计过程假设观测数据为连续变量。稍加修改,这种估计算法就可以用于二进制尺度上的数据,甚至用于更复杂的模型,如高阶结构。本研究旨在通过对真实数据的仿真和应用来确定高阶结构建模方法的性能,重复指标法和两阶段法中哪一种效果更好。通过仿真研究发现,二元数据的重复指标法(BinPLS)优于两阶段法。实证结果还表明,采用重复指标方法的BinPLS测量模型优于标准PLS。对结构模型的评估也表明,采用重复指标方法的BinPLS是最好的,因为它产生的路径系数和解释多维贫困和社会保护模型的能力优于采用两阶段方法和标准PLS的BinPLS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信