Comparison of conventional and digital lectures and examinations with respect to the conditions after COVID-19 period – an example for a bachelor lecture on textile finishing

B. Mahltig
{"title":"Comparison of conventional and digital lectures and examinations with respect to the conditions after COVID-19 period – an example for a bachelor lecture on textile finishing","authors":"B. Mahltig","doi":"10.25367/cdatp.2023.4.p284-293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Due to the appearance of COVID-19, many lectures and examinations at universities are forced to digital formats. In the first post-pandemic semester again, the change from digital to conventional lectures was demanded. By this background the question arises, what is the better format for lecture and exam – digital or conventional? This question is discussed on the example of a bachelor lecture on textile finishing for the time period from 2019 to 2023. The combination of digital lecture and digital exam leads to strong participation numbers and by this to more successfully passing students. If the exam is done as conventional written text, the influence if the lecture is digital or conventional is weak. Also, the numbers of passing students or the finally achieved mark are mainly not dependent on the type of lecture format. Finally, it can be state that a digital lecture is more successful if there are also digital parts in the examination. Also, the return to conventional lectures and exams after the pandemic period is possible without influencing the student performance compared to pre-pandemic situation.","PeriodicalId":488272,"journal":{"name":"Communications in development and assembling of textile products","volume":"86 20","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communications in development and assembling of textile products","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25367/cdatp.2023.4.p284-293","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Due to the appearance of COVID-19, many lectures and examinations at universities are forced to digital formats. In the first post-pandemic semester again, the change from digital to conventional lectures was demanded. By this background the question arises, what is the better format for lecture and exam – digital or conventional? This question is discussed on the example of a bachelor lecture on textile finishing for the time period from 2019 to 2023. The combination of digital lecture and digital exam leads to strong participation numbers and by this to more successfully passing students. If the exam is done as conventional written text, the influence if the lecture is digital or conventional is weak. Also, the numbers of passing students or the finally achieved mark are mainly not dependent on the type of lecture format. Finally, it can be state that a digital lecture is more successful if there are also digital parts in the examination. Also, the return to conventional lectures and exams after the pandemic period is possible without influencing the student performance compared to pre-pandemic situation.
在 COVID-19 之后,比较传统和数字授课与考试的条件--以纺织品整理学士学位课程为例
由于新型冠状病毒感染症(COVID-19)的出现,许多大学的讲座和考试都被迫采用数字格式。在流感大流行后的第一个学期,要求从数字授课转变为传统授课。在这样的背景下,问题出现了,什么是更好的讲座和考试形式-数字还是传统?以2019 - 2023年纺织整理本科课程为例,讨论了这个问题。数字授课和数字考试的结合带来了强大的参与率,从而使学生更成功地通过考试。如果考试采用传统的书面形式,那么数字授课或传统授课的影响就很弱。此外,通过学生的人数或最终达到的分数主要不依赖于讲座形式的类型。最后,可以说,如果考试中也有数字部分,那么数字讲座就会更成功。此外,与大流行前的情况相比,大流行期间后可以恢复传统的讲座和考试,而不会影响学生的表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信