The COVID-19 Pandemic Shut Down Did Not Adversely Affect Outcomes of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair

Akshar V. Patel, Andrew J. Stevens, Amogh I. Iyer, Noah Takacs, Vikas Munjal, Greg L. Cvetanovich, Grant Jones, Julie Y. Bishop, Ryan C. Rauck
{"title":"The COVID-19 Pandemic Shut Down Did Not Adversely Affect Outcomes of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair","authors":"Akshar V. Patel, Andrew J. Stevens, Amogh I. Iyer, Noah Takacs, Vikas Munjal, Greg L. Cvetanovich, Grant Jones, Julie Y. Bishop, Ryan C. Rauck","doi":"10.60118/001c.84518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We investigated whether patients who received an arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) in January-March 2020 had a difference in outcomes compared to patients who received it the previous year. Institutional records were queried to identify patients who underwent an arthroscopic RCR between 1/1/19 to 3/17/19 and 1/1/20 to 3/17/20. The 2020 patients were contacted by phone in October 2022 for follow-up. Patients were divided into cohorts based on year of surgery. Demographic information, range of motion (ROM), and physical therapy were analyzed using inferential statistics. This study identified 50 and 51 patients in 2020 and 2019, who had a minimum of 1 year follow-up. Rotator cuff repairs done in 2019 had improvements in forward elevation (FE) (135º to 161º; p<0.01) and internal rotation (IR) (L4 to L1; p-value<0.01) whereas those done in 2020 did not improve their forward elevation (146º to 151º; p=0.42) or internal rotation (L3 to L2; p=0.29). Patients in 2019 completed more physical therapy sessions (2019: 25.0; 2020: 16.7; p<0.01). Patients in 2020 also experienced a significant delay from date of surgery to date of first physical therapy session (2019: 28.5 ± 11.9 days; 2020: 35.0 ± 16.5 days; p-value=0.03). Of the 2020 patients, 8% (4/50) patients did not initiate physical therapy after RCR, 16% (8/50) reported a delay in physical therapy while 44% (22/50) reported that the COVID-19 pandemic affected their recovery following RCR. At final follow up, patients reported a SANE score of 78.2 ± 12.1 on the affected shoulder, 91.3 ± 10.4 on the unaffected shoulder, a mean VAS pain score of 2.3 ± 1.8. Patients who underwent arthroscopic RCR in early 2020 had a longer delay to starting PT, did less PT overall, but still had comparable range of motion and strength at final follow-up.","PeriodicalId":298624,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Experience &amp; Innovation","volume":"80 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Experience &amp; Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.60118/001c.84518","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We investigated whether patients who received an arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) in January-March 2020 had a difference in outcomes compared to patients who received it the previous year. Institutional records were queried to identify patients who underwent an arthroscopic RCR between 1/1/19 to 3/17/19 and 1/1/20 to 3/17/20. The 2020 patients were contacted by phone in October 2022 for follow-up. Patients were divided into cohorts based on year of surgery. Demographic information, range of motion (ROM), and physical therapy were analyzed using inferential statistics. This study identified 50 and 51 patients in 2020 and 2019, who had a minimum of 1 year follow-up. Rotator cuff repairs done in 2019 had improvements in forward elevation (FE) (135º to 161º; p<0.01) and internal rotation (IR) (L4 to L1; p-value<0.01) whereas those done in 2020 did not improve their forward elevation (146º to 151º; p=0.42) or internal rotation (L3 to L2; p=0.29). Patients in 2019 completed more physical therapy sessions (2019: 25.0; 2020: 16.7; p<0.01). Patients in 2020 also experienced a significant delay from date of surgery to date of first physical therapy session (2019: 28.5 ± 11.9 days; 2020: 35.0 ± 16.5 days; p-value=0.03). Of the 2020 patients, 8% (4/50) patients did not initiate physical therapy after RCR, 16% (8/50) reported a delay in physical therapy while 44% (22/50) reported that the COVID-19 pandemic affected their recovery following RCR. At final follow up, patients reported a SANE score of 78.2 ± 12.1 on the affected shoulder, 91.3 ± 10.4 on the unaffected shoulder, a mean VAS pain score of 2.3 ± 1.8. Patients who underwent arthroscopic RCR in early 2020 had a longer delay to starting PT, did less PT overall, but still had comparable range of motion and strength at final follow-up.
COVID-19大流行停产并未对关节镜下肩袖修复术的疗效产生不利影响
我们调查了在2020年1月至3月接受关节镜下肩袖修复(RCR)的患者与前一年接受该手术的患者相比,结果是否有差异。查询机构记录,以确定在19年1月1日至19年3月17日和20年1月1日至20年3月17日期间接受关节镜RCR的患者。于2022年10月电话联系2020例患者进行随访。根据手术年份将患者分成队列。人口统计信息、活动度(ROM)和物理治疗使用推断统计分析。本研究在2020年和2019年分别确定了50名和51名患者,他们至少进行了1年的随访。2019年进行的肩袖修复术改善了前仰角(FE)(135º至161º;p<0.01)和内旋(IR) (L4 ~ L1);p值<0.01),而在2020年进行的试验没有改善其前仰角(146º~ 151º;p=0.42)或内旋(L3到L2;p = 0.29)。2019年的患者完成了更多的物理治疗疗程(2019年:25.0;2020: 16.7;p < 0.01)。2020年的患者也经历了从手术日期到第一次物理治疗日期的显著延迟(2019年:28.5±11.9天;2020年:35.0±16.5天;假定值= 0.03)。在2020名患者中,8%(4/50)的患者在RCR后没有开始物理治疗,16%(8/50)的患者报告物理治疗延迟,44%(22/50)的患者报告COVID-19大流行影响了他们在RCR后的恢复。在最后随访时,患者报告患肩的SANE评分为78.2±12.1,未患肩的评分为91.3±10.4,平均VAS疼痛评分为2.3±1.8。在2020年初接受关节镜RCR的患者延迟开始PT的时间更长,总体上做的PT更少,但在最终随访时仍有相当的活动范围和力量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信