Justice, Mining, and Legal Reforms in the Finnish Arctic

Q1 Social Sciences
Jukka Similä, Henri Wallen
{"title":"Justice, Mining, and Legal Reforms in the Finnish Arctic","authors":"Jukka Similä, Henri Wallen","doi":"10.23865/arctic.v14.5903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper assesses the extent to which the justice concerns of local stakeholders in the Arctic region of Finland are reflected in recent legal reforms. The reforms concern the Mining Act, the Act on a Mined Minerals Tax, the Nature Conservation Act, the Environmental Damages Fund, and the Act on the Sámi Parliament. The assessment is made from the perspectives of distributive, procedural, recognition, and intergenerational justice. We identified the justice concerns by conducting 21 interviews and a workshop, after which we analysed the legal reforms and discussed whether they reflected the justice concerns expressed by local stakeholders. We concluded that most of the justice concerns had been addressed, but only to a certain extent. Still, the most fundamental features of the governance of mining activities have not changed. By its very nature, the Finnish system of mineral ownership has remained a claim system, albeit not an entirely pure one. The reforms were not designed to limit the total volume of mining activities, and the mineral industry, backed by the EU and national policies, is likely to grow in the region. The most important legal change concerns the position of the municipal council. Today, a local land use plan is a precondition for granting a mining permit. The national Parliament did not approve a government proposal to reform the Sámi Parliament Act, which was a significant failure in recognition justice.","PeriodicalId":36694,"journal":{"name":"Arctic Review on Law and Politics","volume":"76 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arctic Review on Law and Politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23865/arctic.v14.5903","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper assesses the extent to which the justice concerns of local stakeholders in the Arctic region of Finland are reflected in recent legal reforms. The reforms concern the Mining Act, the Act on a Mined Minerals Tax, the Nature Conservation Act, the Environmental Damages Fund, and the Act on the Sámi Parliament. The assessment is made from the perspectives of distributive, procedural, recognition, and intergenerational justice. We identified the justice concerns by conducting 21 interviews and a workshop, after which we analysed the legal reforms and discussed whether they reflected the justice concerns expressed by local stakeholders. We concluded that most of the justice concerns had been addressed, but only to a certain extent. Still, the most fundamental features of the governance of mining activities have not changed. By its very nature, the Finnish system of mineral ownership has remained a claim system, albeit not an entirely pure one. The reforms were not designed to limit the total volume of mining activities, and the mineral industry, backed by the EU and national policies, is likely to grow in the region. The most important legal change concerns the position of the municipal council. Today, a local land use plan is a precondition for granting a mining permit. The national Parliament did not approve a government proposal to reform the Sámi Parliament Act, which was a significant failure in recognition justice.
芬兰北极地区的司法、采矿和法律改革
本文评估了芬兰北极地区当地利益相关者的司法关切在最近的法律改革中反映的程度。这些改革涉及《采矿法》、《采矿税法》、《自然保护法》、《环境损害基金》和《Sámi议会法》。评估是从分配、程序、承认和代际公平的角度进行的。我们进行了21次访谈,并举办了一个工作坊,以确定市民对司法问题的关注。之后,我们分析了法律改革,并讨论这些改革是否反映了本地持份者对司法问题的关注。我们的结论是,大多数司法问题已经得到解决,但只是在一定程度上。然而,管理采矿活动的最基本特征并没有改变。就其性质而言,芬兰的矿物所有权制度仍然是一种索取权制度,尽管不是完全纯粹的制度。这些改革并不是为了限制采矿活动的总量,在欧盟和各国政策的支持下,该地区的采矿业很可能会增长。最重要的法律变化涉及市议会的地位。如今,当地土地使用计划是发放采矿许可证的先决条件。国民议会没有批准政府改革Sámi议会法的提议,这是承认正义的重大失败。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arctic Review on Law and Politics
Arctic Review on Law and Politics Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信