Sexual Orientation and Risk for Elder Abuse: Findings from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging

Gloria Gutman, M. Karbakhsh, Heather G. Stewart
{"title":"Sexual Orientation and Risk for Elder Abuse: Findings from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging","authors":"Gloria Gutman, M. Karbakhsh, Heather G. Stewart","doi":"10.21926/obm.geriatr.2304260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study addresses knowledge gaps concerning prevalence and risk factors for elder abuse among sexual minority (SM) compared to heterosexual Canadians aged 65+. Data derive from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging, a national cohort study. Outcome variables include self-reports of psychological, physical, or financial abuse in the 12 months before interview and overall. Main explanatory variables are sexual orientation and gender identity; covariates include other socio-demographic characteristics, general and mental health. Overall prevalence of elder abuse was 10.0% among heterosexual and 12.0% among SM participants, with highest prevalence (18.1%) among SM females. The most common subtype was psychological abuse (8.8%), with highest prevalence among SM females (15.5%) followed by financial (1.4%), also with highest prevalence among SM females (7.0%). Physical abuse was least common (1.3%), with highest prevalence (2.4%) among SM males. Bivariate associations showed higher odds of experiencing psychological, financial and overall abuse among SM compared to heterosexual individuals (Odds Ratio (OR) = 1.41, 3.33 and 1.53, respectively), however within multivariable logistic regression models, sexual orientation was a significant predictor only for financial abuse (OR = 2.62). Our study is among the first to determine prevalence of elder abuse among SM older adults, and examine the interplay of gender identity and sexual orientation with other risk factors. Findings suggest divergent risk across gender and sexual orientation groups and abuse subtypes. Implications include addressing gaps in reporting and need to build capacity and agency for prevention and action, especially among SM females.","PeriodicalId":74332,"journal":{"name":"OBM geriatrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OBM geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21926/obm.geriatr.2304260","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study addresses knowledge gaps concerning prevalence and risk factors for elder abuse among sexual minority (SM) compared to heterosexual Canadians aged 65+. Data derive from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging, a national cohort study. Outcome variables include self-reports of psychological, physical, or financial abuse in the 12 months before interview and overall. Main explanatory variables are sexual orientation and gender identity; covariates include other socio-demographic characteristics, general and mental health. Overall prevalence of elder abuse was 10.0% among heterosexual and 12.0% among SM participants, with highest prevalence (18.1%) among SM females. The most common subtype was psychological abuse (8.8%), with highest prevalence among SM females (15.5%) followed by financial (1.4%), also with highest prevalence among SM females (7.0%). Physical abuse was least common (1.3%), with highest prevalence (2.4%) among SM males. Bivariate associations showed higher odds of experiencing psychological, financial and overall abuse among SM compared to heterosexual individuals (Odds Ratio (OR) = 1.41, 3.33 and 1.53, respectively), however within multivariable logistic regression models, sexual orientation was a significant predictor only for financial abuse (OR = 2.62). Our study is among the first to determine prevalence of elder abuse among SM older adults, and examine the interplay of gender identity and sexual orientation with other risk factors. Findings suggest divergent risk across gender and sexual orientation groups and abuse subtypes. Implications include addressing gaps in reporting and need to build capacity and agency for prevention and action, especially among SM females.
性取向与虐待老人的风险:加拿大老龄问题纵向研究的发现
这项研究解决了与65岁以上的加拿大异性恋者相比,性少数群体(SM)中虐待老年人的患病率和风险因素方面的知识差距。数据来自加拿大老龄化纵向研究,这是一项全国性的队列研究。结果变量包括访谈前12个月和总体上的心理、身体或经济虐待的自我报告。主要解释变量为性取向和性别认同;协变量包括其他社会人口特征、一般健康和心理健康。虐待老人的总体患病率在异性恋者中为10.0%,在SM参与者中为12.0%,其中SM女性的患病率最高(18.1%)。最常见的亚型是心理虐待(8.8%),SM女性中患病率最高(15.5%),其次是经济虐待(1.4%),SM女性中患病率最高(7.0%)。身体虐待最不常见(1.3%),男性男性男性的患病率最高(2.4%)。双变量关联显示,与异性恋个体相比,SM个体遭受心理、经济和整体虐待的几率更高(比值比(OR)分别为1.41、3.33和1.53),但在多变量logistic回归模型中,性取向仅是经济虐待的显著预测因子(OR = 2.62)。我们的研究首次确定了SM老年人中虐待老人的普遍程度,并研究了性别认同和性取向与其他风险因素的相互作用。研究结果表明,不同性别和性取向群体以及虐待亚型之间的风险存在差异。其影响包括解决报告方面的差距,以及需要建立预防和行动的能力和机构,特别是在男男性行为女性中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信