At Noon: (Post)Nihilistic Temporalities in The Age of Machine-Learning Algorithms That Speak

Talha Işsevenler
{"title":"At Noon: (Post)Nihilistic Temporalities in The Age of Machine-Learning Algorithms That Speak","authors":"Talha Işsevenler","doi":"10.33182/agon.v17i2.3076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article recapitulates and develops the attempts in the Nietzschean traditions to address and overcome the proliferation of nihilism that Nietzsche predicted to unfold in the next 200 years (WP 2). Nietzsche approached nihilism not merely as a psychology but as a labyrinthic and pervasive historical process whereby the highest values of culture and founding assumptions of philosophical thought prevented the further flourishing of life. Therefore, he thought nihilism had to be encountered and experienced on many, often opposing, fronts to be fully consumed and left behind. Thus, just as Nietzsche captured the subtle reinventions of nihilism in new forms in his time, in the new doers assumed behind new deeds (WP 488), this article focuses on the contemporary tectonic shifts brought by digital technology and challenges subjectivation and narrativization of algorithmic will to power in human-like interfaces such as ChatGPT. Having identified philosophers and himself as the most advanced nihilists in their overvaluation of truth, in the 4th part of Thus Spoke Zarathustra, Nietzsche grappled with the difficult, perhaps impossible, temporality of post-nihilistic historicity that oscillates between highest creativity and highest truths, especially in the sections entitled The Shadow and At Noon whereby he explored new temporal techniques to evade the relapses into temporal nihilisms of the notions of linear progress or eternity (TSZ, 4). By drawing on this juncture, this article offers ways to address transfigurations of nihilism behind new technological performances of subjectivity. The article points toward creative temporalities beyond narrativity and subjectivity insofar as the statistical operations and probabilistic estimations of language-models exceed grammatical construction of meaning. This multifaceted application of his thought on the contemporary ontic reality is necessary to perceive our comet's incalculable movement as a veritable ray of sunshine.","PeriodicalId":280178,"journal":{"name":"The Agonist","volume":"75 20","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Agonist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33182/agon.v17i2.3076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article recapitulates and develops the attempts in the Nietzschean traditions to address and overcome the proliferation of nihilism that Nietzsche predicted to unfold in the next 200 years (WP 2). Nietzsche approached nihilism not merely as a psychology but as a labyrinthic and pervasive historical process whereby the highest values of culture and founding assumptions of philosophical thought prevented the further flourishing of life. Therefore, he thought nihilism had to be encountered and experienced on many, often opposing, fronts to be fully consumed and left behind. Thus, just as Nietzsche captured the subtle reinventions of nihilism in new forms in his time, in the new doers assumed behind new deeds (WP 488), this article focuses on the contemporary tectonic shifts brought by digital technology and challenges subjectivation and narrativization of algorithmic will to power in human-like interfaces such as ChatGPT. Having identified philosophers and himself as the most advanced nihilists in their overvaluation of truth, in the 4th part of Thus Spoke Zarathustra, Nietzsche grappled with the difficult, perhaps impossible, temporality of post-nihilistic historicity that oscillates between highest creativity and highest truths, especially in the sections entitled The Shadow and At Noon whereby he explored new temporal techniques to evade the relapses into temporal nihilisms of the notions of linear progress or eternity (TSZ, 4). By drawing on this juncture, this article offers ways to address transfigurations of nihilism behind new technological performances of subjectivity. The article points toward creative temporalities beyond narrativity and subjectivity insofar as the statistical operations and probabilistic estimations of language-models exceed grammatical construction of meaning. This multifaceted application of his thought on the contemporary ontic reality is necessary to perceive our comet's incalculable movement as a veritable ray of sunshine.
正午:会说话的机器学习算法时代的(后)虚无主义时间性
这篇文章概括和发展了尼采传统的尝试,以解决和克服尼采预测在未来200年内展开的虚无主义的扩散(WP 2)。尼采不仅将虚无主义视为一种心理学,而且将其视为一个迷宫和普遍的历史过程,在这个过程中,文化的最高价值和哲学思想的基本假设阻碍了生命的进一步繁荣。因此,他认为虚无主义必须在许多(往往是对立的)战线上遭遇和经历,才能被完全消耗和抛弃。因此,正如尼采在他的时代以新形式捕捉到虚无主义的微妙重新发明,在新行为背后的新实现者(WP 488)中,本文关注的是数字技术带来的当代构造变化,以及在ChatGPT等类人界面中对算法权力意志的主体化和叙事化的挑战。他认为哲学家和他自己都是最先进的虚无主义者因为他们高估了真理,在《查拉图斯特拉如是说》的第四部分,尼采抓住了困难的,也许是不可能的,后虚无主义历史性的暂时性在最高的创造力和最高的真理之间摇摆,特别是在题为“阴影”和“中午”的章节中,他探索了新的时间技术,以避免线性进步或永恒概念的时间虚无主义的复发(TSZ, 4)。通过利用这个关键时刻,本文提供了解决主体性新技术表演背后虚无主义变形的方法。本文指出,由于语言模型的统计操作和概率估计超过了意义的语法结构,因此创造性的时间性超越了叙事性和主观性。他的思想在当代地球现实中的这种多方面的应用是必要的,以理解我们的彗星的不可估量的运动作为一缕真正的阳光。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信