{"title":"The prevalence of COVID-19 among healthcare professionals at primary healthcare centers","authors":"Raheem Hussein Zayer","doi":"10.48165/sajssh.2023.4605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The SARS-CoV-2 infection typically triggers discernible immunological responses in most reported cases. Employing a serological test could identify prior asymptomatic infections and aid in evaluating an individual's immune status. Given that healthcare professionals face a higher risk of COVID-19 exposure, the utilization of personal protective equipment remains the foremost approach in averting disease transmission within healthcare facilities. Objectives: To ascertain the prevalence of COVID-19 among healthcare professionals working in primary healthcare centers located within the AL-Sader city district. Method: During the period between November 1st, 2020, and December 31st, 2020, a cross-sectional study was carried out in nine primary healthcare centers, chosen through a cluster random sampling method. Result: Out of the 470 participants included in the study, 101 (21.5%) had a documented history of COVID-19 infection, with 76 confirmed through polymerase chain reaction analysis. Notably, a notable correlation between a positive rapid immunological test result and a prior history of COVID-19 infection (p-value < 0.001). The rapid test showed a sensitivity of 56.6% and a specificity of 79.2%. Specifically, 125 participants (26.6%) tested positive using the rapid test, with 104 (83.2%) exhibiting IgG antibodies, 5 (4%) displaying IgM, and 16 (12.8%) showing both IgG and IgM antibodies. Conclusion: The prevalence of COVID-19 infection among participants exceeded the anticipated levels. Significantly, there was a discernible correlation between positive rapid test results and COVID-19 infection, as well as factors such as smoking, comorbidities, PPE training, and household infections. ","PeriodicalId":426776,"journal":{"name":"South Asian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities","volume":"75 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South Asian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48165/sajssh.2023.4605","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The SARS-CoV-2 infection typically triggers discernible immunological responses in most reported cases. Employing a serological test could identify prior asymptomatic infections and aid in evaluating an individual's immune status. Given that healthcare professionals face a higher risk of COVID-19 exposure, the utilization of personal protective equipment remains the foremost approach in averting disease transmission within healthcare facilities. Objectives: To ascertain the prevalence of COVID-19 among healthcare professionals working in primary healthcare centers located within the AL-Sader city district. Method: During the period between November 1st, 2020, and December 31st, 2020, a cross-sectional study was carried out in nine primary healthcare centers, chosen through a cluster random sampling method. Result: Out of the 470 participants included in the study, 101 (21.5%) had a documented history of COVID-19 infection, with 76 confirmed through polymerase chain reaction analysis. Notably, a notable correlation between a positive rapid immunological test result and a prior history of COVID-19 infection (p-value < 0.001). The rapid test showed a sensitivity of 56.6% and a specificity of 79.2%. Specifically, 125 participants (26.6%) tested positive using the rapid test, with 104 (83.2%) exhibiting IgG antibodies, 5 (4%) displaying IgM, and 16 (12.8%) showing both IgG and IgM antibodies. Conclusion: The prevalence of COVID-19 infection among participants exceeded the anticipated levels. Significantly, there was a discernible correlation between positive rapid test results and COVID-19 infection, as well as factors such as smoking, comorbidities, PPE training, and household infections.