Design of experiment and simulation approach for analyzing automated guided vehicle performance indicators in a production line

Salazar Javier Eduardo, Shih-Hsien Tseng
{"title":"Design of experiment and simulation approach for analyzing automated guided vehicle performance indicators in a production line","authors":"Salazar Javier Eduardo, Shih-Hsien Tseng","doi":"10.1177/00375497231214565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several manufacturing industries try to reduce transportation waste using automated material handling systems, which can enhance the transportation of raw materials from one location to another in the production line of a manufacturing area. The issue with transportation and job flow is a critical factor in a production line because some production stations need to wait for the work-in-progress to be delivered. Automated guided vehicle (AGV) transportation needs a setup of traffic control over a factory’s physical infrastructure and simulation. Doing so can help showcase and evaluate possible deficiencies that can be improved in the real job flow scenario of the production line. The design of experiment plays a huge role in finding and explaining variations of information under conditions that are regularly put as a hypothesis to reflect or describe the variation. A simulation model is implemented by adopting simplified AGV parameters. The model development follows the structure of system specification → machine specification → AGV specification → discrete-event simulation model → experimental design → analysis of performance indicators (PIs). To precisely reflect an alternative for evaluating aforementioned issues, this study proposes the model stated above and an analysis that is based on the PIs. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) results are chosen to analyze different factors affecting the PIs. Using the factorial ANOVA test results, this study uses one-way and two-way interactions to compare the relationship between job flow time, AGVs, AGV utilization, number of AGVs, and average waiting time.","PeriodicalId":501452,"journal":{"name":"SIMULATION","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SIMULATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00375497231214565","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Several manufacturing industries try to reduce transportation waste using automated material handling systems, which can enhance the transportation of raw materials from one location to another in the production line of a manufacturing area. The issue with transportation and job flow is a critical factor in a production line because some production stations need to wait for the work-in-progress to be delivered. Automated guided vehicle (AGV) transportation needs a setup of traffic control over a factory’s physical infrastructure and simulation. Doing so can help showcase and evaluate possible deficiencies that can be improved in the real job flow scenario of the production line. The design of experiment plays a huge role in finding and explaining variations of information under conditions that are regularly put as a hypothesis to reflect or describe the variation. A simulation model is implemented by adopting simplified AGV parameters. The model development follows the structure of system specification → machine specification → AGV specification → discrete-event simulation model → experimental design → analysis of performance indicators (PIs). To precisely reflect an alternative for evaluating aforementioned issues, this study proposes the model stated above and an analysis that is based on the PIs. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) results are chosen to analyze different factors affecting the PIs. Using the factorial ANOVA test results, this study uses one-way and two-way interactions to compare the relationship between job flow time, AGVs, AGV utilization, number of AGVs, and average waiting time.
设计实验和模拟方法,分析生产线上的自动导引车性能指标
一些制造业试图使用自动化材料处理系统来减少运输浪费,这可以加强原材料在制造区域生产线上从一个位置到另一个位置的运输。运输和工作流程的问题是生产线的一个关键因素,因为一些生产站需要等待正在进行的工作被交付。自动导引车(AGV)运输需要对工厂的物理基础设施进行交通控制和仿真。这样做可以帮助展示和评估在生产线的实际工作流程场景中可以改进的可能的缺陷。实验设计在发现和解释条件下的信息变化方面起着巨大的作用,这些条件通常被作为一个假设来反映或描述变化。采用简化后的AGV参数建立仿真模型。模型开发遵循系统规范→机器规范→AGV规范→离散事件仿真模型→实验设计→性能指标分析的结构。为了准确反映评估上述问题的替代方案,本研究提出了上述模型和基于pi的分析。选择方差分析(ANOVA)结果来分析影响pi的不同因素。利用因子方差分析检验结果,本研究采用单向和双向交互来比较作业流程时间、AGV、AGV利用率、AGV数量和平均等待时间之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信