The Degree of Permanent Pacemaker Dependence and Clinical Outcomes Following TAVI: Implications for Procedural Technique

I. Dykun, A. A. Mahabadi, Stefanie Jehn, Ankur Kalra, T. Isogai, O. Wazni, Mohamad Kanj, A. Krishnaswamy, G. Reed, James J Yun, Matthias Totzeck, R. Jánosi, Alexander Y Lind, Samir R Kapadia, T. Rassaf, R. Puri
{"title":"The Degree of Permanent Pacemaker Dependence and Clinical Outcomes Following TAVI: Implications for Procedural Technique","authors":"I. Dykun, A. A. Mahabadi, Stefanie Jehn, Ankur Kalra, T. Isogai, O. Wazni, Mohamad Kanj, A. Krishnaswamy, G. Reed, James J Yun, Matthias Totzeck, R. Jánosi, Alexander Y Lind, Samir R Kapadia, T. Rassaf, R. Puri","doi":"10.1093/ehjopen/oead127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Conduction abnormalities necessitating permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation remains the most frequent complication post-TAVI, yet reliance on PPM function varies. We evaluated the association of right-ventricular (RV)-stimulation rate post-TAVI with 1-year MACE (all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalization).\n \n \n \n This retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing TAVI in 2 high-volume centers included patients with existing PPM pre-TAVI or new PPM post-TAVI. There was a bimodal distribution of RV-stimulation rates stratifying patients into 2 groups of either low [≤10%: 1.0 (0.0, 3.6)] or high [>10%: 96.0 (54.0, 99.9)] RV-stimulation rate post-TAVI. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated comparing MACE in patients with high vs. low RV-stimulation rates post-TAVI.\n \n \n \n From 4659 patients, 408 patients (8.6%) had an existing PPM pre-TAVI and 361 patients (7.7%) underwent PPM implantation post-TAVI. Mean age was 82.3 ± 8.1 years, 39% were women. A high RV-stimulation rate (>10%) development post-TAVI associated with a 2-fold increased risk for MACE [1.97 (1.20, 3.25), p = 0.008]. Valve implantation depth was an independent predictor of high RV-stimulation rate [odds ratio (95% CI): 1.58 (1.21, 2.06), p=<0.001] and itself associated with MACE [1.27 (1.00, 1.59), p = 0.047].\n \n \n \n Greater RV-stimulation rates post-TAVI correlates with increased 1-year MACE in patients with new PPM post-TAVI or in those with existing PPM but low RV-stimulation rates pre-TAVI. A shallower valve implantation depth reduces the risk of greater RV-stimulation rates post-TAVI, correlating with improved patient outcomes. These data highlight the importance of a meticulous implant technique even in TAVI recipients with pre-existing PPMs.\n","PeriodicalId":93995,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European heart journal open","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjopen/oead127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Conduction abnormalities necessitating permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation remains the most frequent complication post-TAVI, yet reliance on PPM function varies. We evaluated the association of right-ventricular (RV)-stimulation rate post-TAVI with 1-year MACE (all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalization). This retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing TAVI in 2 high-volume centers included patients with existing PPM pre-TAVI or new PPM post-TAVI. There was a bimodal distribution of RV-stimulation rates stratifying patients into 2 groups of either low [≤10%: 1.0 (0.0, 3.6)] or high [>10%: 96.0 (54.0, 99.9)] RV-stimulation rate post-TAVI. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated comparing MACE in patients with high vs. low RV-stimulation rates post-TAVI. From 4659 patients, 408 patients (8.6%) had an existing PPM pre-TAVI and 361 patients (7.7%) underwent PPM implantation post-TAVI. Mean age was 82.3 ± 8.1 years, 39% were women. A high RV-stimulation rate (>10%) development post-TAVI associated with a 2-fold increased risk for MACE [1.97 (1.20, 3.25), p = 0.008]. Valve implantation depth was an independent predictor of high RV-stimulation rate [odds ratio (95% CI): 1.58 (1.21, 2.06), p=<0.001] and itself associated with MACE [1.27 (1.00, 1.59), p = 0.047]. Greater RV-stimulation rates post-TAVI correlates with increased 1-year MACE in patients with new PPM post-TAVI or in those with existing PPM but low RV-stimulation rates pre-TAVI. A shallower valve implantation depth reduces the risk of greater RV-stimulation rates post-TAVI, correlating with improved patient outcomes. These data highlight the importance of a meticulous implant technique even in TAVI recipients with pre-existing PPMs.
TAVI 术后永久起搏器依赖程度和临床结果:对手术技术的启示
传导异常需要永久起搏器(PPM)植入仍然是tavi后最常见的并发症,但对PPM功能的依赖程度各不相同。我们评估了tavi后右心室(RV)刺激率与1年MACE(全因死亡率和心力衰竭住院率)的关系。这项回顾性队列研究在2个大容量中心进行TAVI患者,包括TAVI前已有PPM或TAVI后新出现PPM的患者。tavi后rv刺激率呈双峰分布,将患者分为低[≤10%:1.0(0.0,3.6)]和高[>10%:96.0(54.0,99.9)]两组。计算危险比(HR)和95%置信区间(CI),比较tavi后高和低rv刺激率患者的MACE。4659例患者中,408例(8.6%)患者在tavi前存在PPM, 361例(7.7%)患者在tavi后植入PPM。平均年龄82.3±8.1岁,女性占39%。tavi后的高rv刺激率(>10%)与MACE风险增加2倍相关[1.97 (1.20,3.25),p = 0.008]。瓣膜植入深度是高心室刺激率的独立预测因子[优势比(95% CI): 1.58 (1.21, 2.06), p=<0.001],其本身与MACE相关[1.27 (1.00,1.59),p= 0.047]。tavi后新的PPM患者或tavi前已有PPM但rv刺激率低的患者,tavi后较大的rv刺激率与1年MACE增加相关。较浅的瓣膜植入深度降低了tavi后rv刺激率升高的风险,与改善的患者预后相关。这些数据强调了一丝不苟的植入技术的重要性,即使是在已有ppm的TAVI受者中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信